Fat.
It’s a word that’s sitting in my stomach with weights tied to its feet. It’s floating down past the food I binged on and then it’s watching the purge; making the toxic cycle complete.
It’s eating up space in my mind, this obsessive outlook about the size of my thighs.
I think I’d be happier, more loveable, and more confident if I was skinnier. I lie to everyone and myself about wanting to lose weight to be healthy when it’s all about the exteriors.
I know it’s not true, just my brain trying to make me want it more, by using a twisted methodology it has always used before. My beautiful brain tries so hard to be helpful but, the whispered insults about my body to spur on change are only making me miserable.
I remind myself that the clawing voices in my mind won’t go away because I’m thinner, and I won’t magically love what’s in the mirror even if I weighed nothing more than a feather.
But, I like the grass.
No, not the bits of green in the salad, but the blades that reside on the other side of the mirror, where I assume the stars all shine clearer and of course my body is the type of unachievable perfection I’ve forever been dreaming of.
body dysmorphia is my best friend - t.k.o.
90 notes
·
View notes
Oh shoot that's cool! I think I only noticed after looking at his eyes recently and how you drew them, then after going back it became clearer to me, but thanks for that tidbit of info!
Just a small aside, but the way you draw your characters and portray them narratively and visually really give me a sense of hope, if that makes sense? Like I feel seen and especially since if I wasn't an artist I'd 100% be a Marine Biologist, so your corner of the world here is firing on all cylinders XD.
(Also I seriously SERIOUSLY love how you design cephalopods, it makes me wanna kinda redesign my own OC/Sona XD)
D'aw thank youuu,,,
and He's a vampire squid! so his eyes have this glassy eyed look to them, his species and disability don't have any correlations tho -- I just wanted a low vision character with a signal cane since I use one too (giving my characters my disabilities since the dawn of time)
and GOD I keep telling myself if I wasn't disabled maybe I could have been a marine biologist.... or at the very least have diving as a hobby, dramatic sigh.
31 notes
·
View notes
you know how genshin has character stories, yes? the have chapters, the part about vision, and i suppose something, like, noteworthy or special to them? so i was looking through them, y'know, to freshen up my knowledge of them hehe
so here i am looking thru yoimiya's
owwww, how cute!! she measures happiness by how mush candy is left, my sunshine 🥰🥰🥰
love the usefulness, you go queen, don't listen to people who call it ugly
a gift 🥺🥺🥺 from her teachers 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺 to keep her safe 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 my dear
...
what
so by that logic, the most important thing that we can learn, besides his backstory, is that he is very adept at forgery
and you know what is theorised to be forged by him?
that little trinket😃😃
and now we know that gnosis hold the power of dragon sovereigns
and right before that we see that
a) venti blesses dvalin with power of the anemo archon
b) venti can make temporary (but tangible) illusions
and i mean, story doesn't tell you useless information, it's either lore important or foreshadowing 👀👀👀
all that i'm saying is that the theory that venti returned the dragon powers to dvalin is very, very plausible
297 notes
·
View notes
I've been reading a lot of books lately and it really has been a great medium for self-discovery. Learning what I do and don't like, what works in plots vs what doesn't, character likeability etc. It's definitely going to help me as a writer. But also a person, weirdly enough.
I'm not someone who really steps out of my comfort zone. I'd always replay/watch the same games/movies/tv shows/anime/music. Only really read fics or books I loved as a teen as well I'll be honest lol. But kinda in the last two years I started changing that. Mainly cus my mental health improved enough for me to cope w unfamiliarity or darker themes, but also due to boredom. The enclosure lacked fresh stimuli.
For example, I never would have touched Mad M*n with a ten-foot pole a few years ago. Now I'd rate it as one of the best shows I have ever seen. And due to that, I was able to realise that I want to write something like that, and that writing something like that is possible. Which I never would have known I was compelled by such a thing if I never stopped watching lord of the rings on repeat.
4 notes
·
View notes
I used to work for a trade book reviewer where I got paid to review people's books, and one of the rules of that review company is one that I think is just super useful to media analysis as a whole, and that is, we were told never to critique media for what it didn't do but only for what it did.
So, for instance, I couldn't say "this book didn't give its characters strong agency or goals". I instead had to say, "the characters in this book acted in ways that often felt misaligned with their characterization as if they were being pulled by the plot."
I think this is really important because a lot of "critiques" people give, if subverted to address what the book does instead of what it doesn't do, actually read pretty nonsensical. For instance, "none of the characters were unique" becomes "all of the characters read like other characters that exist in other media", which like... okay? That's not really a critique. It's just how fiction works. Or "none of the characters were likeable" becomes "all of the characters, at some point or another, did things that I found disagreeable or annoying" which is literally how every book works?
It also keeps you from holding a book to a standard it never sought to meet. "The world building in this book simply wasn't complex enough" becomes "The world building in this book was very simple", which, yes, good, that can actually be a good thing. Many books aspire to this. It's not actually a negative critique. Or "The stakes weren't very high and the climax didn't really offer any major plot twists or turns" becomes "The stakes were low and and the ending was quite predictable", which, if this is a cute romcom is exactly what I'm looking for.
Not to mention, I think this really helps to deconstruct a lot of the biases we carry into fiction. Characters not having strong agency isn't inherently bad. Characters who react to their surroundings can make a good story, so saying "the characters didn't have enough agency" is kind of weak, but when you flip it to say "the characters acted misaligned from their characterization" we can now see that the *real* problem here isn't that they lacked agency but that this lack of agency is inconsistent with the type of character that they are. a character this strong-willed *should* have more agency even if a weak-willed character might not.
So it's just a really simple way of framing the way I critique books that I think has really helped to show the difference between "this book is bad" and "this book didn't meet my personal preferences", but also, as someone talking about books, I think it helps give other people a clearer idea of what the book actually looks like so they can decide for themselves if it's worth their time.
Update: This is literally just a thought exercise to help you be more intentional with how you critique media. I'm not enforcing this as some divine rule that must be followed any time you have an opinion on fiction, and I'm definitely not saying that you have to structure every single sentence in a review to contain zero negative phrases. I'm just saying that I repurposed a rule we had at that specific reviewer to be a helpful tool to check myself when writing critiques now. If you don't want to use the tool, literally no one (especially not me) can or wants to force you to use it. As with all advice, it is a totally reasonable and normal thing to not have use for every piece of it that exists from random strangers on the internet. Use it to whatever extent it helps you or not at all.
44K notes
·
View notes
Been a while since one of my sister's parties made me actively shut down and go nonverbal; It's also been a while since I came away with a feeling of such strong /I am made entirely wrong, I am fucking broken, and I wish I could k*ll myself/ but ya know. That's what happens when you get wisked right off the bus from work and everyone is chatting around a bonfire for three hours and one of the few safe people is always occupied and. Like how else am I supposed to feel when
Four separate times
I was introducing myself like "hey, I'm Bryan, Bailey's brother", and then we just sat in awkward silence and I couldn't continue the conversation, so the person Got Up and Left to talk to someone else. How else am I supposed to take that other than that I fucking just suck. And Ive tried. I tried so hard.
But it isnt their fault is it? There were activities that even introverted people can get into.
My sister was prodding me like there's rad people over there, did you talk to anyone neat, such and such works for Boeing, and I tried and I just.
It isnt their fault Im made like this. It isnt their fault Im unable to carry on a conversation with real adults or just hop in and work the fire pit with people that know how to build fires, or do literally anything that engages people at a party. It's mine.
Happy fucking solstice I guess. Jesus christ.
0 notes