I just want to remind everyone that Wallace is canonically the worse one to sleep in the same bed with.
Scott can be a bad roommate in every other aspect but GUYS Wallace is the one that canonically snores and kicks in his sleep.
Scott sleeps like a princess with his back against the sheet lying perfectly straight (and also taking all the covers) and Wallace sleeps semi-on-his-side and apparently just fucking punting Scott in the leg every so often (not to mention he talked in his sleep too) and I don’t know why this is important to me but it is.
Because when people draw them cuddling in their sleep it’s always Wallace being normal and Scott turning and snoring and shit but you’re missing out on sleepy-cuddly Wallace turning and snoring on Scott. Let that cringe-fail 25 year old be annoying. Istg.
I’m talking to the Mobillace people too btw. Not that I’ve seen anyone draw them cuddling in bed (which is a CRIME btw. Draw that. For me.) but like imagine how funny it would be: Mobile stays the night for the first time and the hot-weirdo is a bed-menace, snoring and kicking and tossing and turning and suction cupping for warmth and Mobile is like “I want him to be my boyfriend” THATS FUNNY! LIKE-
198 notes
·
View notes
positive energy guys!
I love you
You love me
We're a happy family
With a great big hug
And a kiss from you to me
Won't you say you love me too?
I love you
You love me
We're best friends like friends should be
With a great big hug
And a kiss from you to me
Won't you say you love me too?
Barny the dinosaur!!! wont you come and sing with me???
ALL THE POSITIVITY ALL THE TIME!! Lot’s of love guys💕
52 notes
·
View notes
i’m always torn between giving matthew brown a tragic backstory as an orphan that grew up in different foster homes and getting into the military at age 18 or having a totally normal suburban upbringing but he was always just a lil freak
25 notes
·
View notes
WTTMV Keeper!Poppy, Stitcher!Julie, Theories/just talking(also a non WTTMV character, Solver!Frank)part two
This got cut in half because Tumblr was being weird, ok now let’s continue on with part two and I’m aware that I forgot about this
I do find this one interesting even if I’m not sure quite sure what happened.
Unfortunately Solver’s world got destroyed by Stitcher some time after he left it, he doesn’t know that tho. Keeper on the other hand does.
The Connecting backstories.
Also It’s been pretty interesting learning about Solver!Frank, all the bits of lore I got to see. It is kinda sad to see the ask blog go but life goes on, at least I got to see it happen in the first place, everyone wish Rose the best regards I think I said that right.
This had my interest and it still does to this day
fun fact: this when I started looking through posts for lore, well it me a bit to actually do it, like I waited a bit before I went the blog for lore. I still find it weird that no one was making theories posts on Keeper’s lore, despite the fact she had a connection to Stitcher; who is one of our main villains, which should have been a reason a good reason for others to make theories yet no one did?, it’s so weird.
I finally know what happened here and I’ll talk about it at some point. All I’m going to say the lore is on the website that Ariki posted and was talking about not to long. It has some lore about the other characters too, like Archivist and a certain Wally variant who Stitcher hates for example. I wish good luck who plans on finding it next.
Special thanks to @/chocolategothwolfhorse for finding it. I don’t know where you found it but good job.
So we now know that Stitcher became active way later on in the story compared to the other casts and that she sometimes gets fabrics from Trader.
Another example of interactions between characters that are like, I think it’s interesting and cool to it. To me It adds a lot to the story and world, seeing two characters from opposing sides; who might hate/dislike each other, choosing not fight because the store they’re in doesn’t allow it. I like seeing things like this, this is why I thought Coupier and Stitcher at the wedding from last year was interesting. It revealed something I wasn’t expecting and wasn’t thinking about at the time.
A earlier Instance of elaborating on stitcher’s friends who are kept in her Collection, about who ends up in her Collection and why, they’re still alive and ‘conscious’ to an extent.
We finally got more information on what Stitcher’s rules for killing are
So Stitcher doesn’t kill any of the puppets in her collection herself, so all the puppets in her collection were killed by someone else. Any puppets she killed aren’t apart of it. Some other things
we learn there’s some characters she won’t kill or she try to befriend first. Stitcher doesn’t kill any variants of her siblings, From her exact words we Coupier would be the one to do that.
“I've met plenty of versions of them since then. I don't really like having to kill some during missions, so Crou is generally the one to do it, while I take care of the ones he doesn't want to kill. We're a great team !"
Since she didn’t kill this version of her siblings, who did what happened to them before “she fixed them”?
@arikihalloween
Part one - Part three
some food for thought
17 notes
·
View notes
Fandoms are wild places nowadays man. Maybe they always were?
I saw a couple takes about Loki and the Loki TV series, and my first instinct was to roll my eyes. But I kept thinking about it, and I realized, taking a peek at their profiles - they’re young. They’ve probably only been reading comics for what, five, MAYBE ten years? And they’re at the age where they’re trying to create their own identities and certain characters or stories or universes are imprinting on them like baby ducks. And I get it, man. I was in that place at that age too.
So let me, an old, just explain something to you.
Stories are never made of stone. They are as air, or water. Mutable.
The story of Loki in the TV series is not the same as the story in the MCU movies. That story is not the same as the current comics run. That story isn’t the same as Agent of Asgard, which isn’t the same as Young Avengers, which isn’t the same as Siege, which isn’t the same as Journey into Mystery. You wouldn’t recognize the very first appearance of a Loki from 1949 as one of the Olympian gods. And NONE of those stories even comes anywhere near the original Norse myth from the Prose Edda.
When you are a storyteller - even if you are working with a character you did not create - you get to WRITE YOUR OWN STORY. Not only that, you SHOULD write your own story. We NEED you to write your own story. Every single human being in this earth has a unique experience and viewpoint. They need to bring that new perspective to old stories.
Because without that, old stories - and the story of Loki is very old indeed - don’t stay preserved in gold amber for all eternity, just the way you remember and prefer them. They die.
And I get it. I understand having a story imprint on you, and the frustration when retellings get it “wrong”. For me, it was the way the X-Men movies handled the Dark Phoenix storyline; my preferred telling was the ‘92 cartoon. Spoiler alert though: the cartoon didn’t tell the story the same way as the comics run by Chris Claremont, which was itself a rewrite of an earlier comics storyline. (Do you see the pattern yet?)
But at least storytellers keep trying. Because the tragedy isn’t when the story doesn’t speak to you. The tragedy occurs when stories are lost, forever.
18 notes
·
View notes