#Non-canonical books

[dogstardigitalindex]

Title: The Book of Enoch Explained Channel: ReligionForBreakfast (Dr. Andrew Henry) Length: 14:59

Book of Enoch is over 100 chapters long; Enoch himself is barely mentioned in the canonical books - in Genesis he "walked with God" and then "God took him." Book of Enoch was very popular in early church and is even cited in the Book of Jude.

There are actually 3 books of Enoch; this video is about Book 1. Oldest parts date to 4th or 3rd c. BC, but most complete manuscripts are from 15th or 16th c. and written in Ge'ez. Probably written in Aramaic, then Greek, then Ge'ez. Portions found in Dead Sea Scrolls.

Makes brief Genesis mention of Nephilim & expands them to a society of "Watchers" led by Shemihaza. Is one of the oldest apocalyptic tales in Judaism & influences other books of the Bible. The Book of Enoch has been rejected by modern Judaism (excepting 3rd Enoch), but is important in Kabbalah. Fell out of favor with Christians by 4th c. when important leaders like Augustine rejected it. It is canon in the Ethiopian Orthodox church.

Enoch (Idris) is also in Islam and, like the Bible, his mention is short and ambiguous.

#Non-canonical books #Enoch #1 Enoch #Ethiopian Orthodox #Nephilim #Shemihaza #Youtube #Book of Enoch #Early Christianity

[lilowoof]

splatoon 3 and those they/them octo pussies, eh?

#splatoon #splatoon 3 #octoling #shiver #dedf1sh #acht #I could have sworn dedfish was using they/them waaaay back from art book notes but also. could have just been a head canon #it's funny. IDM ppls headcannons on any of the characters or their pronouns but #dedfish is the only one who I kinda recoil when ppl use she/her in a cis way. IDK WHY it irks me so much #but to each their own. call em how you wanna! #also they both have cheeto hands. like. just non binary thingssss #art of pigs

[thatonefandomjumper]

The whole "Post being screenshotted and mocked" fiasco has lead me to actually check out what´s happening on the Pjo Twitter side of the fandom out of curiosity and holy shit I have never been more grateful to be a Tumblr user it´s like those guys hate fun and crucify anyone who disagree with them or their opinions??? Like, holy shit I'd like to issue a letter of gratitude to the fandom here, thank you so much for having basic human decency, my gods.

#I knew it was bad but not THIS bad #Gods how do those poor fans that like non-canon ships survive there??? #pjo #It feels like they take the canon of the books as the holy word of god and if you stray from it DEATH #Jasico shippers you are braver than our troops I see now how bad you have it over there #Every other non-canon ship too especially involving Nico but you guys seem to be hit the hardest

[iloveyoublue]

looks at ur canon: wow that’s a lot of words bro. too bad i’m not reading them

#jegulus #rosekiller #we are literally talking about dead gay wizards from the 70s that appeared in one sentence of a book written 30 years ago it’s not that deep #marauders #i promise you me liking a non canon pair of people who literally have zero screen time in the og books won’t kill u #sunkiller #starchaser #bartylus #dorlene #rosestarkillerchaser

[aroaceleovaldez]

i hope this doesn't sound like a silly or weird thing to send you, but i'm autistic and have long thought of nico and a handful of other riordanverse characters as autistic and i love your posts about why nico in particular seems intentionally autistic-coded. but i've been thinking, if rick did intend for any of his characters to be autistic, why wouldn't he say so outside of the text at least? i can't think of a good reason why not, when he goes out of his way to be explicit about so many other characters' various marginalized identities and has confirmed things like reyna being asexual outside of the original text. so it gives me this nagging sort of doubt that maybe rick just made nico come off as so extremely autistic coded by accident, somehow. if it wasn't an accident i do kind of wish he'd say so because there's next to zero explicitly stated autistic representation in, like, any media so it'd be nice to have here even if not strictly necessary. either way though, like i said, i love your posts and i agree with you 100% about autistic nico! some others i like to think are autistic are annabeth and leo.

(Most of this is gonna be kind of a tangential ramble to your point and i apologize in advance just bear with me)

This actually touches upon something I've been meaning to do a write-up on recently, which is: depending on the coding, that is our explicit statement. In most coding, actually, that's kind of the point. (Also something something Death of the Author.)

You may have noticed a recent trend across media of characters saying things directly rather than expressing them in a natural way, and often this includes incredibly stilted dialogue of characters explaining things in very politically correct, wikipedia-esque descriptions and terminology that make absolutely no sense for the characters' personalities or mannerisms. This is born out of the idea that if something is not stated in explicit terms, no amount of evidence below an outright direct exact statement will ever count - if two characters of the same gender have an explicit kiss and wedding on-screen, it doesn't matter because they never said the word "gay," etc etc.

In PJO, prior to more recent books, we get plenty of examples of characters explaining parts of their identities without direct statements. Percy never needs to say in outright terms that he has PTSD from Gabe - and it doesn't make sense that he would! He's 12! He's never been diagnosed for that. He probably doesn't even know what PTSD is really. But we, the audience, know without a doubt he has PTSD, because it is clearly expressed to us. That is coding. Tyson is coded as having down syndrome. Nico is coded as being autistic. It doesn't make sense for Nico to turn to the camera and explain that he's autistic and what that means, because he definitely never got diagnosed for it and probably doesn't know what that means cause the diagnosis literally did not exist when he was growing up - and heck, autism terminology was still kind of getting sorted out back in 2007 when TTC was published, so it's unlikely we could have feasibly gotten any exact terminology wink-wink-nudge-nudges short of something like how Percy outright mentions other students called Tyson the r-slur in Sea of Monsters. And in fact we see that same exact style of coding with Nico later on in the series. Nico never turns to the camera and says word-for-word "I am gay, I am mlm, here's me wearing my exact pride flags" (until TOA/TSATS, which... did the exact thing i mentioned about characters speaking like theyre trying to get a good grade in therapy, or giving a powerpoint presentation). But it is never unclear that HoO is telling us outright that Nico is gay. It's not just hinted at. It's there, in your face. But entirely because no one ever outright says "gay" specifically it's technically still only coding. We know he's gay, we know the characters have trauma/ptsd, etc etc. We don't need it spelled out - that's just kind of condescending. It's like if you said describing a character with "eyes like moss" means they were "green-eye coded."

Nico being autistic-coded isn't hidden. It's not a secret. It's very overt. If you know what autism looks like, well, yeah, there he is. Even if you only know very vague 2007 media presentation of autism, Nico in TTC is easily recognizable enough as autistic because that's the point. Tyson is easily recognizable as being coded as having down syndrome and it's very clearly very intentional! It's just never spoon-fed in exact terms to the reader because it's not necessary! You've already been told the information necessary to tell you what is up with this character, so just plainly going "oh they're [x] in exact terms" is very much telling-not-showing and feels redundant. And while there are places for that kind of thing, most of the time it's very unnecessary. Sometimes coding is subtle, sometimes it's obvious, and yeah there are times where writers code characters unintentionally, but the textual evidence is there, and that's the whole point.

And that's what Death of the Author is about - it doesn't matter what the author intended at the end of the day, because if it's in the text it's in the text. You can look at author intent to try and figure out what that text means, but the text is the text. A Separate Peace is a very classic example - author John Knowles denies there being homosexual subtext, and meanwhile one of the protagonists living in 1942 puts on a pink shirt while saying he doesn't mind of people think of him as gay. What the author says after the fact doesn't matter - if it's there, it's there. So Rick saying anything outside of the books is completely irrelevant. And Rick talks about this a lot - he actively tells people that his statements outside of the books are just his own thoughts, but what's in the books is what's in the books, and if the text supports it then that's all the evidence you need.

Nico specifically is a case where yeah, he's clearly autistic-coded. It's very obvious and very obviously intentional when he's younger, and as the books progress it remains a background trait of his but is still notable (except for when it gets forgotten in TOA/TSATS like everything else, including the adhd/dyslexia, but i digress). It's a clear pattern within the first few books that Rick is intentionally including. It doesn't make sense, especially for the year the book was published, for the reader to be directly told in explicit terminology that Nico is autistic, because the reader is already being told that Nico is autistic.

And yeah, Rick doesn't mention Nico being autistic-coded outside of the text, but he also doesn't mention Tyson being coded as having down syndrome. He also said one time that Percy doesn't have PTSD at all, which is very incorrect starting from book 1. Again, Death of the Author. Whatever Rick says outside of the books does not matter, because he already said it in the books. And there's plenty of other stuff in the books that Rick doesn't touch upon, particularly relating to character identity - did you know Leo is Native? Sammy mentions that the Valdez family is Native in Son of Neptune but we don't get any specifics and then it's like never brought up again anywhere. That happens all the time in the series - and outside of the series - Rick can't possibly address every single point to confirm/deny everything from the books. That's what analysis is for! And that's why my blog exists 👍

#pjo #riordanverse #nico di angelo #autistic nico #analysis #ask #Anonymous #long post // #tone indicator just to be sure cause i know i used a lot of italics: this is all non-agressive/not mad i prommy #im just very passionate about this topic (coding & fandom concepts surrounding ''canon'' + death of the author) #also controversial opinion cause i know some people have talked about wanting the use of the r-slur in SoM censored #but i think it should stay because. well. yeah no that was still very commonly used in 2006 #trust me i heard it a lot. i was there. in fact it was commonly used after that point. for awhile. #it wasnt until like a bit into the 2010s iirc that campaigns started to go ''hey maybe. dont use that word.'' #like that was RECENT #and yeah! these books are not old! TLT is only just coming up on 20 years. thats not super old for a book! #and yeah! that term was considered a-okay terminology to be used in a middle grade book in 2006! which is startling to think now! #but that's also why it's important to not erase that #because otherwise you forget that up until very recently that word was considered Perfectly Acceptable #and in SoM it's even specifically acknowledged to be used in a hurtful way! Percy is actively condemning it! #like. dont put it in the show or whatever. obviously. replace it with a different indication/coding to explain Tyson's struggles #not that i think Disney would put the r-slur in their show. but like. dont erase it from the book??? from 2006?????? #i am frightened to see how the show will handle tyson though. its not gonna go well i can feel it in my bones #anyways man i should post that excerpt from A Separate Peace though #just cause that scene has lived in my brain rent-free for years

[everysongineverykey]

i dunno it kinda bothers me sometimes to see characters who are referred to with they/them pronouns in games described as "ambiguously gendered" or "gender left unclear" or "gender unstated" by fans and stuff like. yeah absolutely they are sometimes that. sometimes the creator had a gender in mind for them while creating them and just didn't think to talk about it in the game. but also, like. sometimes characters can just be nonbinary? and it makes me kinda sad that everyone's first reaction to they/them pronouns in games is "oh, they have a binary gender, it's just up to the player/not stated in-game".

#this is just something i was thinking about #after reading the ut localization book and seeing monster kid and onionsan described this way specifically #like. onionsan isn't really a big deal to me. they're just never talked about in the game. #i'm not treating them as Important Canon Nonbinary Rep because even though i use they/them for them #they're not canonically Anything. #monster kid is sort of the same deal? undyne uses they/them for them #and while it could be argued that she doesn't know them you could also argue they sneak out to follow her a lot #she could've met them before. #eh. it's a non-issue in this case really. at least they didn't describe napstablook that way #but honestly why are they so scared of saying 'nonbinary'. it's clear that that's what napstablook is #with the 'theirself' and all that #which. singular themself/theirself is not a word you see often in media at all! #it certainly wasn't when undertale came out! that was a pretty uncommon word in games! #so props to toby for featuring the first singular themself i ever saw in media and making me go 'woah' #but anyway. if you're curious. the lol book simply says #'the game refers to napstablook as 'them' not 'him' or 'her'' #which. yeah! they're a them! but why do you act like this is some sort of narration quirk #and not just. a character being nonbinary. #i think that became pretty clear when the first few rounds of the undertale art book #came out and used he/him for them #but then someone asked toby about the pronoun difference #and he called them all back and changed their pronouns to they/them in the book once again. #honestly i. only vaguely remember hearing that so if someone has sources i'd love to see them #but like. why can't characters be nonbinary. why can't people just say nonbinary. it's not a scary word.

[revenantghost]

I mean

Maybe the folks saying that Wolfwood is more Peter than Judas are onto something

#Trigun #Tristamp #Trigun Stampede #The source of if Nightow was once Christian is lost #But the shit that Orange pulls #They fuckin' know #Blood #TL;DR: There's a non-canon to some denominations book of the bible that says that Peter asked to be crucified upside down #Because he felt unworthy of being killed like Jesus #At least that's my rusty remembering of it #Hence me leaving this in the tags and not in the post #But I DO know that it's widely thought that Peter was crucified upside down #Sorry y'all the horror movies lied to you #It ain't that creepy it's just sad

[trojanteapot]

she won at flirting

#infinity train #infinity train fanart #fan comic #grace monroe #simon laurent #grimon #infinity train book three #infinity train book 3 #non canon #stuff i made #i learned how to use halftones #and now i abuse em #get ready for wanton abuse of halftones

[theglamour-theterror]

old billboard of some haymitch guy. he won the 50th game.

#haymitch abernathy #thg #the hunger games #oc x canon #the hunger games oc #thg oc #my art #alexandrite mitchell #original character #oc x character #there we go #insanity unleashed #hope it's well received! i actually enjoyed the processs #proud work #memoir of the past #non character and a guy with a paragraph backstory...yes #book accurate haymitch #save me

[fubuwu]

Fuck it. I'm gonna bite the bait just to say that there were many instances where jc clearly trated wwx like a brother/friend in the BOOK, aka the canon text in case anyone was confused or have seemed to have selectively forgotten about.

From the part where jc scoffs at the prospect of wwx getting together with a servant. Laughing and proclaiming that he was treated better than he was (in reference to his own sister peeling his lotus seeds for him which she didn't do for jc).

Then there was him standing up for him on NUMEROUS occasions throughout the book. Such as before the LP Massacre. He could have let his mother beat wwx senseless, but he tried to stop her from doing so, begging and crying even for her to stop and take the punishment for him. Despite the risk it took to do so.

Not to mention the excuses he made to the rest of the cw after the war when he stood up for wwx and shrugged off his casual and overly familiar demeanour.

Then ofc there was the sacrifice he made for wwx (which he didn't have to do as the only male sect heir) whilst they were on the run from the Wens that ultimately led up to the events in the novel..

The Cloud Recesses era.. the part after jfm gave away his dogs and jc steadily welcomed wwx in his life, willing to scare away any dogs that threatened him..

These are all things a nasty, homophobic rich man would NEVER do for his servant if he only saw them as such.

If he was classist as you all seem to think he is, then he would never dream of doing all the above CANON EVENTS for wwx's sake. Js.

These were all in the book. To ignore them, that means you are ignoring mxtx's work and you clearly did not understand the complicated relationship wwx and jc had.

Because it was made clear throughout the text that jc never saw him as a servant. They shared a room, went to school together and made HUGE sacrifices for eachother. So much so, that their relationship pissed of jc's mother.

If you ignore that then you are ignoring a VERY IMPORTANT part of the text. And I have to wonder if y'all only came into the fandom for the mlm relationship between wwx and lwj and not the the story. Clearly, y'all are selectively ignoring some very IMPORTANT facts. Js. This book is MORE than just a bl........

And if that's the case, then you have no place arguing jc canon facts. Js.

#canon jiang cheng #jiang cheng #mxtx mdzs #mo dao zu shi #This tired argument..... #Why do antis willfully ignore the most important part of the text???? #The part that leads up to the canon events?? #And inevitably the story???? #Are they threatened because lwj isn't a main part of it??? #It's not our fault or problem that lwj hardly had as big of an influence to the main plot as jc did #Shrugs #Fyi I'm not ignoring the mlm aspect of the book #This was some groundbreaking work for the gay community with compelling characters that broke these stereotypes #But by boiling down the book to just the mlm aspect and focusing only on the mlm relationship is doing this work a disservice #Especially when there is so much more to this book than just romance #I feel like people only focus on that aspect of the book #And that's a bit boring imo. It is perfectly okay for you explore to other aspects of the book. It won't make you hate wngxian any less. #You can appreciate the interesting mlm relationship mxtx created whilst enjoying the non romantic aspect of the story #The other characters included #It is not that hard #Js.

[lavendersartistry]

NOTE: non-canon reality!

Space Riders AU - @onyxonline

Remember when I said in the kiddos post, Eve gets a lover? WELL HERE HE IS-

Manolo (piglin/bull hybrid) is Eve's husband in Queen's Rage, standing as her King and Adopted Father to her children.

He is very affectionate and loving, sometimes a stay at home dad, and in absolute love with Eve.

Although Eve may not show it all the time, she cares deeply for Manolo and adores him.

Manolo, before becoming a King, was a blacksmith in Atalanta City with his sister Blade. He visited Eve daily and took her out of the palace to enjoy life (what Eve always had wanted). Then the rest became history.

Manolo is aware of the conditions Eve made with the cultists and understands why she did it, even if it had cost rifts in relationships with others. Still, he tries to be a good husband to Eve and assures her whenever she is in doubt.

Both are happily in love. Too bad a wolf couldn't say "I love you" before Manolo did.

#melon tea | art #space riders au #Space Riders AU - onyxonline au #smiling critters au #queen's rage reality | non-canon story #smiling critters oc #eve ewe #manolo #manolo - space riders au #eve ewe - space riders au #note: this is not canon to eve's story for space riders #manolo stands by the rule 'happy life happy wife' #he respects women #eve and manolo are like manolo and maria from book of life #mixed with gomez and morticia #manolo inspired lyra to be a party girl

[corpsezinthecloset]

I get that leaving the lore pretty limited allows people to make AU's and their own stories and theories but to say that every bit of world-building outside the games (which the games don't really tell us much imo) isnt canon is just.... dumb, the books SHOULD be canon because they add depth to the story that we didn't get much of in the actual games. Should I be speaking on the books if I haven't read them? Probably not, but still, Bendy and the Ink Machine isn't FNAF, and you shouldn't be jumping for joy knowing that they're trying to make it that way. And I get people don't like the designs we were shown, cough cough norman cough cough, but no one is forcing you to accept those designs and use them, make your own designs like you've been doing. Anyways rant over

#bendy and the ink machine #bendy and the dark revival #batim #batdr #i forget the names of the books teeehee #i honestly dont care about how anyone reacts to the books being non canon #if you like that then thats fine #i just personally think its stupid

[wholesome-supervillain]

begging someone to write or rec a lotr modern au that’s not also a real world/human au. i want urban fantasy. i want to explore how the different cultures would translate into a more modern world. i want legolas to carry around a glock

#in canon everything is already so ancient #i want to play with this idea by making the non-ancient parts more familiar to the reader #moria is an ancient underground city with electricity and wi-fi (but very poor cell reception) #that inn they stay at in book 1 is just some motel #etc etc #lotr #lord of the rings

[roseworth]

exiled from the dc fandom for saying that some people care way too much about the b/atfam side of the fandom

#SPEAKING MY TRUTH #'fanon [bat thing] is just canon [non-bat thing]' no its not. also who cares #im not saying i dont complain about fanon. i absolutely do #but also. theyre off doing theyre own thing. just ignore them and read your picture books #i see it sooooo much with arrow fans (<- SAYING THIS AS AN ARROW FAN) #it feels like ga fans are constantly in a one sided competition with bat fans #guys let it go!!! who cares!!!!!!

[sexynbgfpollhost]

Mole x Ratty from WITW musical has potential to be a new tumblr ship, and that's why I made a compilation of it. PLEASE give it a chance!!

#wind in the willows #mole x ratty #broadway musical #gay ship #non canon ship #compilation #being in love for 6 minutes not straight #love at first site #PLEASE REBLOG AND SPREAD THE WORD #tumblr ship #queer baiting?? #hamilton #be more chill #childrens book #lgbtqia #queer ship #historians say they were “best friends” even though they literally lived together #Youtube #wind in the willows broadway musical

[ironborealis]

So this post appeared on my feed because I was dumb and said I was interested in things tagged "Severus Snape" because I forget how things work sometimes.

I gave them a long response but I think it's a banger so I've cleaned it up to share.

To preface, I'll say that I was still in school when the books were starting to come out, and so I was in school during the period the books are set. I wasn't in the UK and can't speak to specifics there, but my own.

Your question feels really disingenuous when you tag it #james potter supremacy but I am a fool and going to answer you honestly anyway.

I liked Snape the moment it was revealed in the first book that he wasn't the villain -- because it showed him as someone who gave no fucks about how others saw him. I had been violently bullied for years at that point, but was told that I needed to stop letting it hurt me or to stop acting in ways to invite the abuse. All I internalized was that it was my fault and I needed to change myself so that they'd like me. So meeting a character who just stopped giving a fuck about other people's opinions was fascinating.

The text doesn't, I think, intend for you to read Snape's behavior as incredibly abusive. A lot of his behavior to the students wouldn't have been seen as abnormal when I was in school. Unkind but within tolerance. He was a prick and the assumption with teachers like that was that A) don't take it personally B) If you can't do A then stay off their radar and count the minutes until class is over. I'm hoping that the sudden uproar about how abusive Snape is now is a sign that school culture has changed. Because you're right, it's awful, and shouldn't happen. But that's now, and not then. Then it was acceptable if not exactly encouraged behavior.

For me, Snape's teaching style would have been within normal limits and at least it wasn't false advertising. I saw popular "kind" teachers bully disabled students, throw coffee mugs, and choke slam 9 year olds. Those teachers were never punished. I preferred the hard asses who didn't pretend, but would restrain themselves to only demoralizing you with words. They never went half so far as those much beloved teachers. These were in schools that had long banned corporal punishment by teachers, by the way.

Plus, Snape's bullying is written in such a way that is so over the top and dramatic it's hard for me to believe that there's any real intent as he never follows through with most of his threats. He's amusing himself, which is fucked up, yes, but so is his situation being forced to teach children (a job he hates) by daylight and fighting a war as a spy by moonlight (a job he also hates).

When book 5 revealed his own history of being bullied the kinship I felt for him just kinda clicked. Game knew game, even if I didn't know it then.

What impressed me about Snape is that he made a terrible decision of joining the DE, he knows it, he regrets it, and most importantly he does something about it. He sabotages them and when he can't do that he tries to reduce harm as much as possible.

He joins a side lead by people who are responsible for his own traumas, who are unrepentant about their roles in it but still expect him to get over it. Snape isn't interested in pretending everything is fine with his allies when everything isn't fine and that's such a challenging and brave stance to take.

Because if I were in his shoes, my first instinct would be to swallow all my anger and stuff it in well inside me and pretend it doesn't exist so that I could be seen as agreeable and the bigger person. I know I'm not alone in that. However, that instinct has caused me so much damage that I will spend the rest of my life fighting that instinct tooth and nail.m, because what it means is that you are minimizing yourself and your safety in order to make other people comfortable.

Snape might have the right idea (but poor execution) when it comes to some people, but he falters when it comes to Lily. I was so disappointed with the reveal that Lily was his primary motivation, even if it's grown on me. He's so damned loyal to someone who wasn't even a great friend to him by the end. Lily smiles before she intercedes in SWM, which to me signaled that the whole scene was just a way for James to pull Lily's metaphorical pigtail (Snape) in their courtship and if I were the pigtail I'd be pissed too. It doesn't justify but it adds context for why he might want to hurt her then.

And Snape spends the rest of his life regretting his moments of weakness and giving his life to prevent Voldemort from winning, for a friend who failed him pretty spectacularly.

Most people don't do that -- they regret and then they try to get on with their lives. They don't want to talk about it. We're STILL finding guards from WWII concentration camps hiding out in suburbs after all. Snape doesn't choose that and that's brave as hell.

Snape's "redemption" is a hot debate, but I don't know that redemption is even his goal. He's just trying to do what's right. If he were really searching for redemption then certainly I think he'd have sought a more friendly relationship with Harry, if only on the side.

Which brings me back to how can you claim "James Potter Supremacy" when he's only seen in SWM, where he's a cruel bully to someone minding their own business (SWM takes place after the Shack per canon), and we only have the testimony of Sirius and Remus, a decade after his death, to say that he "got better" -- which meant not publicly tormenting Snape, but doing it in private. We never get to see this better version of James.

Sirius and Remus are highly motivated to put James in the best light possible to his orphaned son, which is natural, but it doesn't make it gospel truth. I think he may have become a better person with time, because that typically happens, and certainly he had the capacity for great kindness (befriending Remus) which makes his decisions to be so cruel even more painful. But he died and we never get to see any of him in canon except him being a complete asshole.

So why would you question how people can like Snape when there is so much more canonical evidence that Snape was a good person with serious faults than there is for James being anything other than a school bully who died young?

#severus snape #pro snape #professor severus snape #pro severus snape #The irony of All the Young Dudes written by #David Bowie #A perennial outsider to that point #Who's gender non-conformity was threatening to the establishment #Becoming so strongly associated with a set of characters who are emblematic OF the establishment #To the point that the Google tells me about the BOOK (their word) before the song #When the FANFIC demonizes the canonically gender nonconforming character. #Awful #flames on the side of my face #i don't want to live on this planet anymore