I think it's very important for my understanding of Scotland is that he cannot succeed in literally anything. And even when he does, it's a monkey's paw of a situation which will turn around and bite him on the ass. He flops so hard at being a world power he copes by creating capitalism. Like that level of incompetent. The man is held together by the chips on his shoulders and short sightedness. He's incapable of playing the long game like his siblings and every single one of his schemes ends with him losing in the most important way.
He's cheery, musically and artistically inclined, and is a good laugh but he's the most mercurial of the bunch, the most stubborn and the most spiteful. Like he'd put washing up liquid in Arthur's tea only to forget which cup he put it in and chug it right in front of his brother, desperately resisting the urge to throw it back up whilst Arthur drinks his own mug utterly oblivious.
16 notes
·
View notes
Fact One: Nicola Sturgeon has in the past expressed a hope that Scotland keeps the royal family as head of state if Scotland goes independent. I’m not entirely sure how that works, but given this is a shit-post rather than a serious political treatise, please bear with me here.
(Tenuous) Fact Two: Given that the English and Scottish kingdoms came together officially when James VI of Scotland also inherited England and became James I of England, there’s a tongue-in-cheek argument for saying that the English royalty died out with Elizabeth I, and then Scottish royalty ‘obtained’ England.
(Inaccurate) Conclusion: The royal family belongs to Scotland.
(Tongue-in-Cheek) Proposal: If Scotland goes independent they have to take the royal family with them. (Not sure if that would encourage more independence votes or less.)
38 notes
·
View notes
Recently been trying to develop a headcanon where Scotland is hard of hearing, and currently imagining him and Norway communicating through sign language one night. Norway is still learning BSL, he’s trying his best but he’s making mistakes, and Alistair is happily trying to guide him through and correct those mistakes. Nor struggles the most with the facial expressions, and Alistair is trying to model it for him but since Norway is so used to wearing a blank facial expression, he’s really struggling, which results in some silly and funny looks. The pair of them wind up laughing and giggling together, Scotland looks at him with the warmest smile ever. And Norway takes this as his opportunity to sign something he’s been practicing for months and months to get perfect for Alistair, “I love you.”
16 notes
·
View notes
leaving edinburgh today!!! wish we got to stay longer but oh well, i got to meet a good friend (ILY @tmae3114) and explore! but. also importantly. i got to go to the memorial of a true hero— corporal wojtek my beloved 🫡
two wonderful older scottish ladies took the photo for me and one called me love it was soul healing
4 notes
·
View notes
here is a situation I would like you to consider. Imagine a charity, right?
This charity has a staff of 207, of whom around 5-8 are people of colour
This charity works in poverty and homelessness reduction, an area which disproportionately affects Black people, Asian people, and non-EU migrants.
This charity operates in Scotland, a country which is considered extremely white with a population who identified as 96% white in the 2011 census
This charity operates in Edinburgh, a city with a population that's still pretty overwhelmingly white, with 91.7% identifying as some form of white in 2011 (5.5% Asian, 1.1% Black or African, 1.6% other/mixed) (the 2022 census numbers aren't out yet so this is real outdated)
The charity has an Inclusion and Diversity staff working group
Despite operating in a pretty white country, this charity is still managing to limbo under the line of 'less white than Scotland as a whole in 2011' by having a staff body which is under 4% people of colour, despite operating in the capital.
All staff of colour in the organisation are below junior management level
All but 2 people of colour in the staff team have, at some point, joined the staff working group then left. Several have mentioned feeling like they're being expected to take on extra diversity work because of their race, and one spoke to feeling like there was no room or interest in discussing racial equity.
There has never been any concerted data gathering or analysis on the racial picture of applications vs successful recruitments in the organisation
When asked, the general take from management is 'people of colour prefer to work for BAME organisations'
When asked about racial equity in recruitment, managers in the inclusion and diversity group repeatedly deflect to talking about reaching BAME client groups by co-working with BAME-focused community organisations.
When asked about putting budget underspend behind scoping the reasons for racial inequity in hiring and retention, managers in the (entirely white) I&D group said, and I quote, "obviously it's important but it's never come up as a priority and we don't need people to come in and tell us what we already know"
"ok what do we already know"
fucking nothing as it turns out because it's "never been a priority"
we don't even know if it's a recruitment or hiring issue
except I do
because I've talked to multiple people of colour who applied and went through the hiring process and were not hired
so people are fucking applying aren't they
anyway I had a very angering day yesterday, how are you all doing?
It's not, in fact, that "they don't want to work here for some reason"
18 notes
·
View notes