Tumgik
#sort of rambling
sweetronancer · 4 months
Text
no bc what if nancy and robin dont have that many scenes together bc the duffers know they have too much chemistry like what if like they force them apart bro.. like they cant have robin ruining that stupid ass love triangle.
also i like totally refuse to believe that robin and nancy didnt like. have any more interactions after fighting vecna or wtv. like!!! it js upsets me.
they shouldve at least kissed or smth. a little peck on the cheek yk.. /hj...../srs NO BECAUSE YOURE TELLING ME NANCY DIDNT PAY ANY ATTENTION TO LIKE ROBINS SUSPENDER OUTFIT LIKE IF I WERE HER I WOULD BE GIGGLING AND I WOULD LEAVE JONATHANS ASS IMMEDIATELY!!!! /HSRS
ronance gets me so worked up its not funny anymore thtbgji
100 notes · View notes
Monsoon is obsessed with frogs and lizards and axolotls
also mistral and monsoon are both autistic
thank you for listening to my ted talk
2 notes · View notes
Text
The act of violence/assholery that makes the infected brother actually reconsider would be really chaotic in the human au. I’ll use the role reversal au as that’s the one where I have this event planned out.
Now, I don’t know what’s funnier: moon willingly jumping off the second floor balcony to escape monty while he’s distracted, or moon ducking under the railing to dodge being grabbed by him and promptly falling off the balcony by complete accident. Either way that argument would come to a very abrupt stop as infected sun has to get to the ground floor to make sure his brother isn’t fucking dead.
The doors don’t open till 6 either so they’d have to figure out a way to treat the injury until they can actually get him help.
The Injuries would probably be having issues breathing normally from being choked or well general movement. Now he couldn’t get his back actually literally torn off, but the harness would be broken. He probably got stabbed in the back of the neck/in between the shoulder blades. Which just makes sun panic even more when he falls off the goddamn balcony and somehow avoids dying and instead just fucks up his leg and further fucks up his back. So needless to say he can’t move very easily, or much at all.
As is with the normal infection, nothing is stronger then being terrified for your sibling.
This would also apply to infected moon. Like he’d also lose his shit that his brother just cracked his head on the floor and forget that killing them is kind of the goal. (Again I still don’t know exactly how he’d hurt him even in the normal au, but it would probably have to do with heights. So dropping him or something, or putting him in a situation where he gets injured in his panic over not being able to see and having a phobia of the dark which I can see him doing. Whatever I do decide on, it will involve a head injury.)
7 notes · View notes
cheridraws · 1 year
Text
The last character you drew/wrote about is now stuck in the last game you played. How screwed are they?
63K notes · View notes
dougielombax · 6 months
Text
I wonder what the largest shellfish is?
Edit: Okay this post is getting a LOT of traction. What is going on?
Edit: Fucking hell.
This post has set off a fucking MINEFIELD!!!
What have I DONE????!!!!!
I’ve lit the blue touch paper and found there’s nowhere to run to!
I’ve summoned a wolf only to unleash a tiger!!!!! Made of fire! And nails.
Probably….
Idk.
Edit 2: 5,000 Notes! Good god! What the HELL do you want from me. I’ve never had a post of mine take off like this until now.
Some got close like the one about homeowner associations (fucking powertripping middle aged mediocrities!) which got at least 1.5k notes but this is the most I’ve gotten on a single post so far.
Anyway.
AND this post has officially gone to hell. (6,666 notes)
Edit: 8,000 notes! Holy shit!
Edit: 9,000 notes!!!
Edit: 10,000 notes!!!!!!!!!
Edit: 15,000 notes!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Edit: 20,000 Notes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHO THE HELL TURNED OFF THE REPLY THREAD FOR THE REBLOGS?!
Okay never mind it’s back. For now at least.
Anyway.
22K notes · View notes
goldensunset · 7 months
Text
did you know? if you do your laundry you can get your clothes back
25K notes · View notes
thebibliosphere · 10 months
Text
One of the really fun and interesting things about writing a polyamorous romance as someone who is ambiamorous/polyamorous is finding new ways to make sure the narrative hits the expected genre beats without just sort of... mushing it into a pre-existing monogamous romance mold, which is what I'm afraid happens a lot of the time.
Trust me, it was my job in the publishing house to make them fit that mold. I hated it.
Reading other poly-centric romances, I can always somewhat tell when someone is writing polyamory from a sexual fantasy aspect (zero shade; I'm here for all the group sex) without actually considering how it functions as a relationship dynamic, which can often come off as... well.
It's lacking for me as a romance.
Erotica-wise, it's fine. But it misses the romantic beats for me that I want as a polyamorous-leaning person.
There's so much emphasis on the polycule and never the individual dyads within the larger relationship.
For example, in a triad, there are actually four relationships to handle.
The dyad between A + B. The dyad between A + C. The dyad between B + C. And the overarching relationship between A + B + C.
With monogamous-leaning authors or authors that've been pressed into conforming to the pre-existing genre beats, there's a tendency to treat the relationship as a homogenous mass where everything is fair and equal, and you treat all your partners the exact same way.
And I get it. It's easier to write everything as peachy-keen and to have external conflict be resolved with either acceptance or a brave confrontation.
But it doesn't always land for me as someone who wants to see my style of love represented in the genre.
In healthy polyamory, either closed or open, each relationship is unique in its own way. Taking the example of a triad again, the way A acts with C likely differs from how A acts with B.
And that's a good thing!
Because C might not want the same things as B, so trying to treat them both the exact same is a surefire way to make sure someone isn't getting their needs met, and that will lead to conflict.
Polyamory isn't striving for equality between partners but rather equity.
What are your individual needs, and how do I meet them, as well as meet the needs of my other partner(s)? What do you want from the larger relationship as a whole? How do we accommodate everyone without making someone feel neglected or uncomfortable? How do we show this in the narrative? How do we make sure character A isn't just treating B the same as C in every interaction? Do they ever fall into that pitfall? How do they remedy it?
It seems like common sense when you write it out like that, but it's a major pitfall I see time and time again. The characters never alternate their approach between partners, if there's any focus on the individuals at all.
The other major telltale thing I've noticed is that taking time to be with one partner is seen as a step down from the "goal" of the greater polycule.
The narrative is framed in such a way that they might start out with individual dates, but the end goal of the romance is to eventually be together 100% of the time all the time, and wanting individual time alone with any one partner is somehow "lesser."
Which is the goal of romance in monogamy, but it's not the goal of romance in polyamory.
Granted, you do need to end on a Happy Ever After or Happy For Now for it to fit the genre requirement. And a nice way of tying that up is to have everyone together at the end as a happy polycule all together all at once. I'm not disputing that as a narrative tool. I'm just pointing out that there's a tendency to present those moments as the sum total of the relationship when in actuality, there are multiple relationships that need to end happily ever after.
The joy of polyamorous love is the joy of multitudes. It's the joy of experiencing new things, both as individuals and as a polycule. If you're not taking care of the individual dyads, however, your polycule is going to crash and burn. You cannot avoid that. So why, then, is there such avoidance of it in stories meant to appeal to us?
Is it simply inexperience on behalf of the author? Or is it that they're not actually being written for us? Is it continued pressure to meet certain genre beats in a largely monogamous-centric genre? All of the above?
Either way, I'm having fun playing around with it and doing all the things we were warned against in the publishing house.
I'm having fun with Nathan and Vlad enjoying their own private dynamic that is theirs and theirs alone. I'm having fun with Ursula and Nathan being so careful and vulnerable around each other. I'm absolutely 100% here for the chaos of Vlad and Ursula without a chaperone. And I'm here for the chaos of Vlad and Ursula together and Nathan's fond, loving eye roll as he trails after them, too enamored to tell either of them no because where would the fun in that be...
Anyway. Don't mind me. Just getting my thoughts out while everyone else is in bed.
6K notes · View notes
Text
forever obsessed with dynamics between vampires, specifically that of a maker and fledgling, as a way to explore abuse. the creation of a vampire itself can so easily be a literalization of the lasting impacts of trauma and also much more simply the ways a perpetrator might shape their victim’s very identity. the extremes of isolation in the way that the new vampire, in most narratives, must cut all ties to their mortal life, or else go through an elaborate charade to maintain the facade of humanity, while forever still being removed from it. and the sheer dependence and vulnerability of being in an entirely new state of being, wholly uncertain of what it entails, and relying on another person to define… everything.
4K notes · View notes
desertduality · 2 months
Text
Not enough was done with the bit from the crossover where hermits were like. their own whole species. And their biggest defining trait was that they were shorter than the average player,
Imagine Joel and Skizz joining hermitcraft and immediately shrinking like six inches. Joel would lose it,
2K notes · View notes
the-adventures-of-dave · 10 months
Text
Around tumblr lately I’ve seen people with the opinion that not only are free roaming cats bad (correct) but also supervised cats in catios or on leashes (????). I assume it must stem from that “ecology of fear” post from a few months ago, but to me the sudden appearance of these kinds of posts just strikes me as odd. I’ve seen multiple posts like the below one in just this week.
Tumblr media
If your cat is contained to your yard/catio/the sidewalk, then it still allows for predator-free safe places in your neighbourhood for wildlife, and creates predictability for them too. That’s one of the reasons why hiking trails ask people to stay on the trail— so you (and your dog, horse, cat, etc) can safely enjoy nature while still giving it space. It is possible to exist outdoors in natural spaces like that while maintaining wildlife comfort. If it wasn’t possible to do that, dog-friendly or (even just hiking trails in general, since humans are predators too) simply wouldn’t exist.
The problem with free roaming cats is that they break boundaries between human area (ie. trail, back porch) and wildlife area (foliage, etc) and there is nowhere the wildlife can go to exist that is safe from predators.
Idk, this is just my opinion but I just think there can be more nuance to the outdoor/free roaming cat issue than “never let your cat step outside under any circumstance”.
4K notes · View notes
angelboybreakdowns · 5 months
Text
rb for reach pls :) (im doing market research /hj)
1K notes · View notes
umbrvx · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
a villain’s journey
3K notes · View notes
veetowervaporwave · 2 months
Text
Nothing is funnier to me than one-sided radiostatic + preestablished staticmoth.
Vox could be having evil sex with his villain wife anytime he wants but he chooses to waste his energy simping over a furry with a bad haircut
665 notes · View notes
Text
I keep seeing posts asking Larian to add a hug option for that scene with Astarion. While I understand it, I completely disagree, and I hope it's never added in.
That scene isn't about Tav. That scene isn't about their relationship, romanced or not. It's solely about Astarion, and the beginning of his journey toward healing.
Sometimes I think about hugging and why we do it. I think a hug in that moment would be more about comforting ourselves through an uncomfortable moment, rather than actually offering any comfort to Astarion. I don't think he would have the capacity to fully take it in or accept it. The brain operates at such a primitive level when you're experiencing trauma. Therefore, it's best to hold back and let him be.
He needs to have that moment for himself, alone. To scream for the rage, the grief, the sadness, the terror, the pain. All of it, all 200 years of it. Long before he met Tav and the gang.
It's perfect as it is, and when he's ready he comes to you and thanks you. Perhaps a hug option at that point would be more appropriate? But again, I feel it really isn't necessary. It's already perfect.
586 notes · View notes
saltpepperbeard · 7 months
Text
gnawing on my arm because i think there's something to be said about how stede not only dreams about himself with a beard, but ed with his full beard back too. like, the dream seems to be riddled with imagery that he thinks ed would want.
and i say this especially because of how stede reacted when ed had to shave his beard. he freaked out on his behalf. he shrieked in horror whereas ed was entirely unbothered. he feared he had ruined him, had dragged him down to some despicable level, when in actuality, ed was completely content to shed that part of his persona.
and then there he is dreaming about ed with that part right on back.
so there's very clearly still a part of his mind that's convinced that's what ed wants. because why wouldn't he? everyone else seems to. and why would he want the softness and femininity stede had been bullied for his entire life?
which in turn plays into his own imagery too. bearded, masculine, fiercesome, rugged...
because how could someone love what everyone has hated him for? how could someone want what everyone has tried to quite literally beat out of him?
1K notes · View notes
rassebers · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Pull yourself TOGETHER man
3K notes · View notes