Tumgik
#BASED ON THE REASONS SURROUNDING IT
engagemythrusters · 1 year
Text
begging solely-The Mandalorian fans to find another piece of Mandalorian lore/culture/history/etc to talk about other than a now-defunct laser sword used to keep one asshole family in power
8 notes · View notes
stewykablooey · 9 months
Text
‘would stewy get mad at kendall for this’ ‘would stewy turn away from kendall for that’ ‘would stewy feel guilty for doing this with kendall’ like. stewy does not operate on a different moral compass than kendall or anyone else on the show. i know we dont see a lot of him and when we do he’s fun and funny and likeable and calling people out on their shit but stewy is not nor has he ever been positioned as a moral or even rational focal point in this narrative. dont let arian moayed’s big brown beautiful earnest eyes fool you.
87 notes · View notes
goldensunset · 3 months
Text
amazes me that people can remember information about routes in pokémon games. like ‘i loooove route 217 ❤️’ ‘route 209 has such a banger theme!!!’ ‘have you made it to route 225?’ ‘you can find this rare pokémon on route 210!’ bestie those are numbers. those are just numbers to me how do you remember which area is which. i think i have a general idea of most of them but i still have to look them up every time i need to refer to them in conversation
19 notes · View notes
Text
Grimwalker/toh headcanon/idea i have because why not:
all of the old grimwalkers from before Hunter (and the other "Caleb" grimwalkers) was alive are all buddies and live together in a big graveyard/cemetery
13 notes · View notes
constantvariations · 1 year
Text
When there's a show that has lots of combat but little to no killing, there's usually a reason for that. I don't just mean the target audience being children (which is a stupid claim anyway, kids can handle way more shit than adults give them credit for), I mean a Watsonian explanation
Aang doesn't kill because he believes it's against his pacifist culture
Batman doesn't kill because he believes in second chances
Vash doesn't kill because it would make Rem sad
But when it comes to the rwby world, the whos and whys of killing... aren't really there?
The villains kill on-screen often, which is a given since, yknow, villains. But our heroes have never had a discussion of how far they're willing to go for their goals
It could've been established during any of the Salem talks, but instead the writers handle it with kid gloves with that Saturday morning cartoon "How do I destroy Salem?" Like, we saw a whole ass human being turned to ash, ShawLuna, you can say "kill," I promise
Due to this, I thought the dynamic was "villains kill, heroes don't," which is fairly typical for shows with this tone
And then Adam was murdered. On screen. By two of our heroes
It was genuinely jarring. There was no lead up to this kind of action, no talk of "doing whatever it takes" or "we have to prepare to do things we might live to regret." Just BAM STAB DEAD
And not even a conversation after! There's literally nothing to distinguish the before/after murder versions of Yang and Blake, which is bad! You took a whole ass man's life! Blake knew him personally! His dreams, his fears, the way he took his coffee, the whole nine yards! Even if it had to be done, that should still have a major affect! Hell, my best friend cried for hours after a bird hit the windshield on our road trip, yet these two are totally okay with ending a person
Even stranger, there has yet to be actual blood spilled by our heroes after that. Not even a skinned knee! Deaths happen around them, not because of them
You've already opened the door for the reaper, you might as well let it settle in for tea
40 notes · View notes
bitch-femme · 11 days
Text
Has anyone noticed this like trend in short form media the last decade where people will make videos mocking people I do not believe exist with unbelievable stereotypes like these pick me girl videos or whatever
3 notes · View notes
halogalopaghost · 3 months
Text
I can really judge how bad of a day I'm having based on how hard it is to get tucked in bed. Sometimes just lifting my weighted blanket to get under it is a HERCULEAN effort. Im working on coming to terms with the fact that this is not my fault.
6 notes · View notes
maroonsposts · 1 year
Text
writing fics is so hard bc i’m like explaining everything to myself in my head so it makes sense but then i don’t translate it well into the fic and it’s just too much😭 like i’ll have a whole bunch of subplots in my brain so that timelines etc., line up (i.e. narcissa moved in with andy when she was younger and andy had moved near alphard, which is how they all go to the same school) and then i’ll just… forget to write it down, then i get comments and im like OH FORGOT TO EXPLAIN THAT.
12 notes · View notes
daydreamerdrew · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Hulk! (1978) #26
#I actually think that Bruce is a really interesting choice for a story focused on these anti-civilization groups#some of the Hulk’s stories get into man versus nature#and that can be with Bruce representing man and the Hulk representing nature#or it can be with the Hulk versus society#for example there was a short story earlier in this series where an old man was frustrated by how much his hometown had changed#all of the technological advancements and nobody was much paying attention to each other anymore#and then the Hulk came rampaging through because he got upset by the lights and smells and sounds of the city#all the cars and construction and advertisements#but he’s also the only one that’s in tune with his surroundings enough to actually notice the man#and afterwards the old man determines that the Hulk isn’t a monster and has some admiration for him for trashing the street#I think that part of the appeal of the Hulk for some people has been his disconnection from society#he’s appealing because he expresses frustration for or rejects things that those readers believe they just have to put up with#can you imagine the Hulk putting up with an office job?#no he’d do what he’d like which is to smash the office and go off in the woods#there’s a wish-fulfillment element for some people#I can actually also see a throughline between these anti-civilization people’s beliefs#that there will definitely be people out to get them if they don’t arm themselves#and the Hulk’s paranoia that all humans hate him and won’t leave him alone#which is not me saying that I think the Hulk’s worldview is reasonable based on his experiences#and therefore that I think these people's is too#just that I think there’s a lot of potential for further complicating some of the themes that this character has been used for#by critiquing these kinds of people#marvel#bruce banner#my posts#comic panels
2 notes · View notes
coquelicoq · 2 years
Text
Au cinquième ou sixième coup de pioche, le fer résonna sur du fer. Jamais tocsin funèbre, jamais glas frémissant ne produisit pareil effet sur celui qui l'entendit. Dantès n'aurait rien rencontré qu'il ne fût certes pas devenu plus pâle.
i know what this means but i feel like i had to do math to get there and i could definitely not show my work if asked. we've got normal conditionnel passé ("n'aurait rien rencontré", formed by conditionnel présent de l'auxiliare + participe passé) and then imparfait du subjonctif + participe passé ("ne fût certes pas devenu") , which could be acting either as the other kind of conditionnel passé (imparfait du subjonctif de l'auxiliare + participe passé; if it used the same kind of conditionnel passé as the main clause, it would be "serait devenu" instead of "fût devenu") or as the plus-que-parfait du subjonctif. i don't see how it would make sense to use both kinds of conditionnel passé in the same sentence, so the "que" (in "qu'il") must be acting as the introduction to a subjunctive clause? or some other kind of literary construction??
the good thing about dumas being long-winded is that he basically already said the same thing in the previous sentence using only the passé simple ("Jamais...ne produisit pareil effet sur celui qui l'entendit"), so i can just sort of plug in the variables. okay, so "pareil effet" = "deven[ir] pâle." got it. i can't support that leap because there are no theorems that i know of where passé simple ≈ plus-que-parfait du subjonctif, but it feels right. it's a good thing french is not a geometry quiz or i would be failing right now.
#a literal translation of that sentence would be something like#Dantès would have met nothing that he would certainly have become paler#which is nonsense#working backward from the meaning (which i am reasonably sure about because of the previous sentence)#it has to be something more like#There is nothing Dantès could have encountered that would have made him become paler#which while awkward at least makes sense#but see how i made that into a main clause with a dependent relative clause? which doesn't exist in the original?#like the 'que' there doesn't work as the introduction to a relative clause because where does the antecedent fit in?#devenir plus pâle does not take an object. there is no antecedent#so the 'que' has to be doing something else. and the way that the tenses change before and after the 'que'#is a hint of some kind. i just don't know what exactly lol#french#my posts#i've gotten to the point where i know too much to understand. like before i knew that fût was the imparfait du subjonctif of être#i would have just been like oh okay that's some form of être which is the auxiliary of devenir. so it's some kind of compound verb tense#but i wouldn't have worried about WHICH compound verb tense. i would have just automatically translated it as whatever#verb tense made sense to me based on what i thought the sentence was saying in the context of surrounding sentences#but NOW i'm like no wait a minute is this the conditional or the subjunctive? and WHY???#i need to either learn more or conveniently forget what i've learned about the imparfait du subjonctif. i told you that you'd all be sorry#once i'd learned the imparfait du subjonctif but it turns out it is i who is sorry. oh the hubris#but anyway he's about to find the treasure guys! here comes the plot!!
2 notes · View notes
guttersniper · 2 years
Text
i think about how mutts character would be butchered if he were canon and i breathe a sigh of relief that he is all mine
2 notes · View notes
ratskool · 10 months
Text
I think a fun thing I shall do is just start looking up old dnb, industrial, and shoe gaze recordings on the internet archive. Ao3 fanatics comparing their site to the library of Alexandria will never experience the pure ecstasy of finding some obscure 80s-90s project that had a grand total of maybe 20 CDs burned with the coldest cruelest beats you ever heard all thanks to an incredible organization and some person thinking “lots of great memories here, hey maybe others will want to download this idk”
1 note · View note
spiribia · 1 year
Text
The fact that GLaDOS drops Chell off in a post apocalyptic world but we never get to see canon rugged post apocalyptic survivor Chell has harrowed me for 7 years. That is like the one reason I wanted a Portal 3. I NEED to see her timeskipped with 20% more stress induced gray hairs, and a rifle, and tattered jacket, and bandaged hands, and chilling and cooking a rotisserie headcrab over a fire in her impromptu camp with like her long stretch of chain reaction physics based traps surrounding it, and she is using the companion cube as a bench. I know she has the will to carve it out, out there
18K notes · View notes
clamorybus · 11 months
Text
honestly i thought i was doing better with myself but last night i merely read the tv tropes page for the movie the whale and i broke down sobbing
0 notes
sadclowncentral · 1 year
Note
What uh. What's the frog story 👀
back when i was in second grade, my elementary school organised a school market with every class selling their crafts for charity. the contribution of my class were hand-sized ceramic frogs we made in art class. each one of us made one of them to be sold for five euros a piece (this is important later). the quality of the frog i made varies drastically based on who is telling the story, and for reasons that will become very apparent later there is no way to check, but i stand by the fact that it was average looking, if a bit wonky.
the day of the market arrived, and all frogs were bought within minutes, snatched up by enthusiastic and proud parents. all except - mine. because my mother hates spending money on unnecessary things, and she hates children's crafts even more. so she - loudly and vehemently - refused, in her thick eastern european accent, to "spend five euros on an ugly frog".
i will never forget seeing my ceramic frog alone on the slightly wet cardboard, surrounded by the imprints left behind by the already sold frogs. all the while other parents are getting more and more agitated, trying to get my mother to put the frog out of its misery. eventually, she budged, and spend five euros on a wonky frog. she was absolutely furious about this.
so furious, in fact, that when we came home to where my father was remodelling the kitchen, she WALLED IT IN. that's right. she cask of amadillo'd that poor ceramic fool. put him into the open wall and slapped concrete over it faster than my poor seven year old self or my dad could protest. out of pure anger over loosing five euros. and that's where it remains, until this day.
my mom hates when this story is brought up, which is why we bring it up all the time. she also thinks she what she did was right, because "do the other parents know where the frog is? no. only your creation is safe. because i love you." morally, i would disagree, but on a pure factual basis, she has a point.
i made her another ceramic frog for her last brithday, which was not buried like some pharaoh, and everytime guests compliment it my brother loudly goes "oh you should see the other frog he made" and when they ask to see it, he points at the wall. this is hilarious to him and infuriating for my mother. and that's the frog story.
34K notes · View notes
prokopetz · 2 months
Text
Ways your fortified points-of-light fantasy city with no discernible agricultural base supports itself that aren't "they eat the monsters":
There's no farmland spreading below the city's mountain fastness because all of the crops are above. Most of the mountain's surface area below the permanent snowline is taken up by a series of colossal hydroponic terraces fed by seasonal meltwater from the snow pack above. (Don't ask who built the terraces.)
The city's famed heaven-piercing towers are aviaries for millions upon untold millions of fruit and seed eating birds, which forage the surrounding countryside by day and roost there at night; their meat and eggs form the community's staple diet. In order to fend off ecological depletion, crack teams of combat-trained wilderness maintenance experts venture forth daily, escorting great cartloads of birdshit on targeted fertilising missions (though in truth they hardly need their swords, as the smell keeps the monsters at bay).
Those weird caverns that seem to be present under every random shed and outhouse are all connected. That's why the giant mutant rats in the basement of the local inn are such a big deal – they're not just annoying the guests, they're also obstructing the community's principal trade route!
For Reasons, the city's population is only about ten percent of its carrying capacity. The city's interior green spaces are presently sufficient for food production, and its citizens take turns dressing up as soldiers and manning the walls once a week to create the illusion of a robust military presence. Unfortunately, the ruse can't last forever, as they lack the manpower to maintain their crumbling infrastructure, nor will they be able to defend themselves when – not if, but when – the neighbouring city-states figure it out.
There's actually plenty of conventional farmland; it's just that the entire campaign takes place south of the city, and the farms are all to the north. Why don't the farms expand southward to claim the clearly arable land? Well, there's a funny story about that...
3K notes · View notes