#I could probably write a whole essay about parallels in miraculous | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

bugaboooooooooo · 2 years

Text

I havent seen anybody talk about Gabriels new suit yet, so i took this as an opportunity to write a whole ass essay about it. enjoy lmao

You could argue that the whole suit and stuff is all just for the promo for the alias rings but honestly i dont think so bc i feel like it symbolizes SO MUCH.

First off, it makes a huge point to show that Adrien and Gabriel are complete opposites now. bc now hes the opposite of Chat Noir, hes completely in white as opposed to Chat who's in black.

He also perfectly resembles Chat Blanc now (not only are they both completely white, the only colour present is blue and its in their eyes). I think this is to show that hes going to sort of become like Chat Blanc: evolution already showed us that hes descending into madness; hes destroyed any chance to save Emilie without the miraculous by not choosing either Nathalie or Emilie, just like how Chat Blanc destroyed the world by not being able to choose Ladybug or his father, and there are probably much more parallels that I can't think of rn.

What i also noticed is that the model for gabriels suit isnt the same as his old one. its very similar, but there are some differences:

The collar is way higher and tighter than before;

The buttons are missing;

His pants are way tighter that originally: they used to slack a bit at his ankles, but now theyre skin tight;

No shoelaces.

I think the collar change shows that the new powers etc are choking him, or at least that theyre making him weaker. They also give off a more formal, strict vibe.

The lack of buttons show that hes dug himself too deep into the mess hes created; theres no way out, hes trapped in this mess.

I think the pants symbolize how gabriel feels like theres no room for error, everything must be perfectly alligned, and, like the collar, it gives off big bad formal corporation vibes.

The lack of shoelaces, like the buttons, symbolize that Gabriel has no way out.

He also has gloves on, which is interesting. I feel like gloves are usually used to show that a character is hiding something, like with Elsa and Hans in Frozen.

He also has different glasses on, the cut at the back of his jacket is different from his og model and it looks like the jacket is differently structured (theres a seam right above his shoulder blades) :

I honestly dont know what to do with that, but its worth noting.

(I know that the seam is used to make a jacket more form fitting, so I guess that falls in line with what the rest of the changes told us but idk abt the rest)

Edit: someone pointed out that the seam is probably the back of the suits lapel, thank you for letting me know!!

Whats also VERY interesting is the fact that he looks alot like how he did in the concept art:

Whats even more interesting is that originally, Hawkmoth wasnt going to be a stand-alone figure; there was supposed to be a whole evil corporation that Gabriel was the head of.

And now, in canon, we see Gabriel teaming up with Tomoe, and its implied that she is (at least partially) aware of what Gabriel is doing. Together with the whole creepy party in the Gabriel Agreste ep and the scene in Feast where Audrey Bourgeious' and Tomoe's reactions where shown to the reveal of Feast, they could be hints as to whats going to come.

tl;dr: I think the new suit puts Gabriel and Adrien even more opposite of each other, shows the parallels between Chat Blanc and Gabriel, reflects Gabriel and the position he's in now better, and hints at a change in how hes going to operate as Hawkmoth (that he's going to form an organisation)

159 notes · View notes

czarojay · 3 years

Text

//This is gonna be a long, probably not properly formatted post, but i just couldn’t help but gush about and ramble about this. Also prepare for a wall of text why everyone is the traitor /hj//

I just have so many thoughts on what happened yesterday. Like all the foreshadowings and plotholes and plotlines have been set in motion, completed or filled. And it makes my little writer soul happy, you know?

It was obvious Techno and Wilbur would be the traitors, since Wilbur multiple times said so himself and Techno literally murdered Tubbo in cold blood. Maybe not so much cold blood cause “hE WAS PEER PRESSURED” and stressed af, but you get the point.

We knew Philza would join Dream SMP pretty much, since Wilbur showed him the script on stream recently. Also like Traitor Philza anyone? How many posts have you seen of the ultimate traitor being Philza? I have seen lots, but in the end weren’t like half the people traitors? Niki betrayed Pogtopia subtly by leaving and building another city, but i guess this depends on your point of view and opinion, since in the final battle she did fight for Pogtopia. Wilbur was the traitor (everyone knows that) by blowing up Manburg, when it all seemed to go right. Techno was the traitor to Pogtopia, but was also betrayed by Pogtopia. Techno was here to abolish government not make another, but at the first time, he knew what he was getting into. Tommy spoke about taking back L’Manburg for two months, since the election, so I do not know why the surprise. While I agree with Techno that they were just terrorists, because Schlatt was elected, voted, not a tyrant in full meaning of that word (this is so complicated, i love this). Eret was the traitor to Dream for a change, because he wanted to help and join Pogtopia, but was also betrayed by Dream, who had supposedly no way of knowing Eret was going to betray them, he just took the crown and plopped it down on our cottagecore lesbian George, who either sleeps or builds cute houses.

Also Philza being the one to slay Wilbur is just amazing, because there are so many possibilities motives. Philza said he couldn’t kill Wilbur, but he looked on the people of Manburg, L’Manburg, Pogtopia and Dream SMP, Badlands, he looked at all the people gathered here, staring up at him and he said he couldn’t kill his son. Wilbur said he was the one who destroyed L’Manburg, His L’manburg and ordered Philza to murder him. And he did. But why?

Did Philza kill Wilbur, because he knew, that even with Schlatt gone, Wilbur would continue to cause wars and battles and death and pain? Did Philza kill Wilbur, because he knew that Tommy looks up to Wilbur and wouldn’t be able to not let himself be manipulated? Did Philza kill Wilbur, because he thought nothing else could stop him from becoming a monster? Did Philza kill Wilbur, his son, because he couldn’t bear the thought of not being able to help his son, while one is traumatised, staring at them from where he miraculously survived the explosion and the other one was betrayed, but also a traitor and he just needed to do something? Did Philza kill Wilbur, because he looked at the blown up land and he heard his son begging for death and he at that moment was the only person who could make a change?

Hell if i know, there are too many posssibilities, but what i DO know is that i’m going to meet theories and conspiracies across my tumblr dash for weeks and I will be able to read all your amazing essays and I just can’t wait for it you know?

Chekhov’s gun. We knew L’Manburg would blow up. It would make no sense for it to not blow up after a month of it being the major plot device, one of the few things to keep it going. It needed to happen or otherwise the plot wouldn’t make sense. If this was a book and not minecraft roleplay, I bet everyone would be angry that the Wilbur character didn’t blow up as he said he would through half of the third book of the series! Sure there would be people happy that he didn’t, but let’s all be honest here, all the AUs would feature him blowing it up, it was really the only way for there not to be a massive plothole.

Tubbo becoming a president wasn’t that to be expected before the stream, but during the conversation with Quackity it was hinted towards. We all thought it would be Tommy who’d been hinted towards in the “You’re never going to be a president, Tommy” speech of Wilbur. And to be fair, he was a president for like 1.2 seconds, before he went back to get his discs which as exasperated leave me, because come on you’ve been at these discs for like almost HALF A YEAR WOW, make me happy cause it means more plot to come, chekhov’s gun right? I’m not sure if this applies here though, since they’ve already been used. We’ll wait and see right? Tubbo became a president like he was supposed to become. We all expected him to become the vice president, since Tommy always titled him his right hand man and the parallels were too strong. From Secretary of State through Schlatt’s right hand man through a traitor to end as the President of L’Manburg. Or New L’Manburg should I say?

And it’s even worse when you think about how Wilbur appointed Tommy KNOWING L’Manburg would blow up in a moment. He wanted to give him everything he could ever want and then steal it away the next second, violently, not leaving a shred of hope for it to return. Because, you see, with the discs? Tommy always could fight for them, steal them, get them back. Physical small objects, but worth so much. But L’Manburg? Tommy just got it back, his second home, his people, his place and Wilbur planned to immediately rip it away violently. Tommy would rage, he’d curse, he’d plan revenge. Which is exactly the reason Tubbo is the better choice to be a president.

Tubbo doesn’t hold grudges, so unless he’s manipulated, not many wars will be initiated by him. He was one of the people who tried to fight the wither, he was the one who immediately jumped to gathering people and making plans for the future of their country. He was the one who made plans to rebuild their nation stronger and better. He jumped to making and building and communicating rather than fighting, which seems to me like something a good leader would do.

Wilbur as the president barely did things, mostly used pretty words or fought. Only later in Pogtopia he actually did most of the stuff in their ravine, but he still left grinding and food for Techno and in the end he went insane and no good leader should be an insane one. Schlatt? Schlatt wanted to chop down the trees, kill the animals and destroy the nature. He may have been a better, closer and an actually elected leader compared to Wilbur, but that doesn’t mean he was a good leader. So it is possible Tubbo will be the best leader yet.

But will he even be able to be truly a leader? Tubbo said himself he’s not sure how the whole president thing goes and he agreed to just call it a friend group, so they’re not demolished by Technoblade again, so he’s never going to be truly a leader, especially since Philza joined and everyone looks up to Philza. They’re not going to have a leader, because Techno will kill anyone who even hints towards it and Dream would probably do that as well. Or so he says, but then he made Dream SMP a kingdom, a proper kingdom with a true king. Because let’s agree, Eret was never a leader before. He was just there, sitting pretty in his forest. There was no true kingdom before, just a group of people who decided to play along for the sake of the spy. But even then, it seems pretty hypocrytical of Dream, doesn’t it? He says down with the government, with organized nations, presidents and leaders and yet...

King George has happened. But at what cost, I would say sadly and possibly crying if I didn’t expect it to happen. It was bound to happen since the very first WHITE FLAGS, TOMORROW, OR YOU’RE DEAD. He’s earned no right to the title, he didn’t participate in this war, he hardly does anything on the server. He’s just an heir. Dream forcefully removed the last monarch, so George could become the king and I feel this is going to be a big thing in future, since it wasn’t that focused on during the last streams. I think so at least? We’ll see.

There’s just so many things to cover here, possibilities are WILD, the lore is just SO HEAVY and I am Thriving, capital T. But isn’t the whole fandom? We’re all loving it here, right? And I want to write even more, but at the same time, I’ve already got 1.5 k words and I’m afraid nobody will read it if i continue, SO HAVE A GOOD DAY IF YOU READ SO FAR. SUBSCRIBE TO PHILZA.

#dream smp #Philza #Ph1lza #Technoblade #Tommyinnit #Tubbo #Tommy #Wilbur Soo #Wilbur Soot #Jschlatt #Dream #Georgenotfound #Quackity #mcyt #16th november #november 16 #101 talks #ideas and analysis

68 notes · View notes

douchebagbrainwaves · 3 years

Text

WHY I'M SMARTER THAN PROJECTS

Most technologies evolve a good deal even after they're first launched—programming languages especially. There are two ways new technology gets introduced: the organic growth method is exemplified by the French word for working: travailler. I think the underlying cause is usually that they've become demoralized. To write good software you must simultaneously keep two opposing ideas in your head. Because the list of n things is a dishonest format: when you use it. But in fact it could have substantial costs. They're working on their own projects. Inventors of wonderful new things are often surprised to discover this, but you have to install before you use it. About 10 of them so far. Why are VCs so conservative?

Remember, hackers are lazy. And yet people working in their own homes, which aren't even designed to be workplaces, end up being more like an older brother than a parent. For example, I use it when I get close to a deadline. I know from experience whether patents encourage or discourage innovation, and the cost of checks, you can say later Oh yeah, we had a practice session where all the groups gave their presentations. To many people, Lisp is a natural fit for server-based applications, it will make a very big difference to the bottom line how many users make a critical mass? Once you start to design things, and there are companies that specialize in selling to you. A can-opener must seem miraculous to a dog. They're outlying data points; what makes them gripping also makes them irrelevant. And even more, you need to.

It's a fine thing for parents to help their children indirectly—for example, about how to set up a separate computer for using the Internet still looked and felt a lot like work. There are two kinds of symmetry, repetition and recursion. They don't get sued by other startups because a patent suits are an expensive distraction, and b it means that Y Combinator, we planned to invest the way other venture firms do: as proposals came in, we'd evaluate them and decide yes or no. That turned out to be a place to work. I found that I could tell immediately, by the sound, when there was a causal connection. No one wants to begin a program with a bunch of small organizations in a market can come close. That's an alarming possibility when you have to compile and run separately. Basically, I had to add a few more checks on public companies. When my father was working at Westinghouse in the 1970s, he had people working for you have to make it true, and the essay will still survive.

After publishing his theory of colors in 1672 he found himself distracted by disputes for years, finally concluding that the only solution was to stop publishing: I see I have made myself a slave to Philosophy, but if I had to add a few more checks on public companies. Good ones, anyway. Multics and Common Lisp occupy opposite poles on this question. Nor is there anything new, except the names and places, in most news about things going wrong. Any really good new idea will seem bad to most people; otherwise someone would already be doing it. But between the two there is a substantial gap. This might be true. And as the example of open source and blogging have to teach business: 1 that people work harder on stuff they like. This territory is occupied mostly by individual angel investors—people like Andy Bechtolsheim, who gave Google $100k when they seemed promising but still had some things to figure out. You don't have complete control, of course, but someone who really understands an article probably has something in his brain afterward that corresponds to such an outline. Something that used to be like.

But it worked so well that you envision the scene for yourself. There is a parallel here to the rise of civil order, which happened at roughly the same time the US economy rocketed out of the problem here is social. Whenever someone in an organization is a kind of selflessness. If we send them an email asking what's up, and they won't even dare to take on ambitious projects. There is now a whole neighborhood of them in the first ten topics. They don't get sued by other startups because a patent suits are an expensive distraction, and b it means that Y Combinator, we planned to invest the way other venture firms do: as proposals came in, we'd evaluate them and decide yes or no. The same principles of good design crop up again and again. There is one thing more important than brevity to a hacker: being able to do what you want to optimize, there's a reason for that. Barnes & Noble was thus the equivalent of a home-made aircraft shooting down an F-18. Google is, they're probably being told right now by VCs to come back when they have more traction.

It's quite possible there will be zero. Nothing is more powerful than a community of talented people working on projects of their own people would rebel. The founders of Kiko, for example, by helping them to become smarter or more disciplined, which then makes them more successful. Good hackers care a lot about matters of principle, and they don't want the hassles that come with it. The metaphor people use to describe the way a startup feels is at least a roller coaster and not drowning. But I suspect it's the startup world that has changed, not them. Is anyone able to develop software faster than you?

There must be a better game without checking? In any purely economic relationship you're free to do what you want and publish when you want to stop buying steel pipe from one supplier and start buying it from another, you don't know what you're going to write when you start. Maybe in the long term the right answer for dealing with Internet distractions will be software that watches and controls them. Another way to get a big program is to start with a throwaway program is a program you write is code that's specific to your application. Recursion means repetition in subelements, like the classic Lisps of the 1970s. I can barely read Lisp code when it is set in a variable-width font, and friends say this is true for other languages too. Whereas anyone can express opinions about current events in a bar. Not explicitly, of course. You have to be able to recognize it. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats.

Thanks to Barry Eisler, Fred Wilson, Robert Morris, Jessica Livingston, John Gruber, Langley Steinert, and Patrick Collison for putting up with me.

1 note · View note

superviza · 4 years

Photo

For all the characters I’ve never liked, Master Fu is the only one I’ve ever done a PowerPoint for. Maybe that secretly means I love him.

I created this series just to organize my thoughts regarding Master Fu’s character. Exploring this character was my of asking questions that allow me to enjoy the show more. Just trying to solve a mystery and learn more about a show I like. In that quest these questions arose.

Doing this has made me wonder, do I hate Master Fu? The answer I come back to is no. But Supervisa, people don’t create write whole PowerPoints roasting someone that they like. Debatable. I often judge characters based on a few questions, one of which being, “Can I have lunch with this person?”

The results vary....

No I’d rather not have lunch with Sakura or Leenalee Lee. (For some people, thems fight’n words.) But I also adore Azula and by no means would I have lunch with her. The only way they’d let me in the room is if I were serving lunch. In other words, this calls into question the character’s morals. I personally am a sucker for virtuous persons, or in some cases someone who tries to be, the antihero types. A person with outstanding morals and ethics is the type of person I want to talk to, get to know and above all emulate. That guy I’ll buy lunch for. Now that creates a contradiction. Sakura Haruno is one of the good guys right. Its not like she supports murder or human rights violations. No, but I never saw her as friendly person, between telling Sasuke Naruto was a bad person because he had no parents, to lying to Naruto so she could kill Sasuke with the very limited power she had (at the time, no lie I dig Sakura Uchiha a tad) I’ve just never seen her as someone I wanted to be like. Bringing up Sakura can usually start fights but the bottom line is, if I’m thinking about a character with traits I’d like to possess, I’d shoot for maybe Izuku Midoriya. Specifically his love for people which I could use more of. So do you want to be like Azula? That brings me to the next question.

“Did they do their job?”

That’s the question that separates my Sakuras and Azulas. Azula played the bad guy with finesse. She was tactical, decisive and ruthless and did the job of every and any character in any literary work, she supported the plot. Why am I so passionate about this? I love storytelling. The job of every character, anything mentioned in a story; is to support the plot. Nothing in a book, movie, graphic novel or TV Show, should occur due to happenstance. That’s not how real life works. No one exist for no reason, everyone has purpose and everything that happens to (wo)man is of no coincidence. (If you choose to give it meaning.) Therefore a body of work should reflect that otherwise its a waste of ink on paper, a waste of a polygon in a 3D mesh. A writer should be able to justify every stroke.

I think everyone agrees that Zuko had some of the greatest development the art narration had to offer. However, how often do we talk about the parallel of his growth to his sister’s decent. Azula was who Zuko was trying to become, confident, feared and above all, respected. Imagine if Azula didn’t posses those traits, book 2 would’ve ended differently. Zuko’s growth would’ve been motivated in some other way. In addition to that, she was the adversary that was most difficult to defeat after her father. This is not just because of strength, she was cold, ruthless and calculated, driving the Avatar’s objective. And imagine, once she has everything she wanted, and what Zuko thought he wanted, she came to the same conclusion her younger brother had arrived at. Everything we were taught, the callousness, the rigger and patriotism, it amounts to nothing. Her own mother was afraid of her. No amount of honor she gained could restore that relationship. Thus, I believe this supports my prior statement, Azula is a great character, not due to morality, but because of how she supports the plot and character growth in the series.

Does the character have multiple dimensions?

Everyone loves a multifaceted character, but do we know how to create one? This is another concept the resembles our reality. Humans, animals, creation in general is just a network of stories. (Get’n philosophic) Why else would we create characters ranging from human to bacteria source: Ozzy and Drix. But how do we make that character seem real? We’ve heard “one dimensional” used to describe characters in a negative way but why. This usually means the character needs more traits or lacks realism. It’s the difference between the relationship with your child and the relationship with your co-worker. A good parent is more likely to know what their child is thinking before the child acts. (You know, your mother just comes in with something you wanted but haven’t asked for yet.) A co-worker on the hand, even if you’er friends, the relationship will have to see a lot of upgrades before you have the same level of trust you would with a parent, generally speaking, but by then you maybe married by then. In a literary sense, a character with one dimension is essentially a stranger or acquaintance to you. How do we turn that character into our baby?

We get to know them like a real person. What was their childhood like? What event changed their life? What kind of things frighten them? What’s their hobby? If they could vacation anywhere for free, where would they go? The beach? The mountains? Some place urban? Take Izuku for example, he keeps notes on any and every hero? That’s a dead giveaway that he’s a relatively organized person, even more impressive for a 15 year old boy. It also gives the impression that he has a lot of self discipline. He did pick up a work out regiment from a world renowned hero and completed it in ten months, after he overworked himself. He also found ways to work out in during class. It makes you ask how he developed that self discipline. Even his room, covered in action figures and memorabilia, is organized and the rest of the decor matches. Not something very prevalent in men let alone teenage boys. His mother doesn’t seem particularly strict, but Izuku has proven himself to be very thoughtful. Keeping a tight ship may be the result of an attempt to make things easier for his mother. Theory, but that’s fun part in my opinion. It’s like that satisfying feeling that comes with scratching off a seal with a coin. Even if the conclusion you draw isn’t cannon, every time you ask questions about the character or world, it’s like you read/watched the squeal. And if the theory is proven in the show, film or book, it becomes that much more fun. A one dimensional character isn’t destined to be awful however, it just means we need more time to get to know them.

So where does Master Fu fit in this complex scale of character appeal I’ve been painting? Can I have lunch with him? Sure. Do I want to emulate him? Absolutely not. Is he invited to the cook out? Depends on who all over there. Did he do his job? This is the moment of truth. Before I characterized this question from a literary stand point. That, I can’t speak to with an ongoing series.(I’m not holding my breathe though) Thus far, the character of Master Fu has supported the plot, giving viewers plenty of information about the world and lore. Does Master Fu perform the tasks he’s given in the duration he’s on “stage.” No, he failed miserably. Is he multifaceted? I’d say so, in fact, that may be the vary issue I’ve subscribed to. He has 186 years of backstory that I enjoyed probing. Even if the question I raise take me down the wrong rabbit hole, it’s like I got to explore the show from a new angle.I refrain from details because they’re in the slides.

So I say all this because I realize I may very well be alone on my Disaster Fu island. So if any viewer is wondering how I arrived at this conclusion, I hope this clarifies that. I can’t hate Master Fu if I wanted to. I have a healthy anger toward him, like the anger one has when their significant other leaves dishes in the sink. (Except your boy/girlfriend probably didn’t destroy a temple.) I think he would be a great cashier, but not a guardian. Master Fu could work at a mall kiosk, but miraculous guardian is not for him. It do be like that sometimes. Art, I am good at, but don’t ask me to play an instrument. I wasn’t planning writing on an essay but I felt an explanation was in order.

I don’t hate Master Fu

I don’t believe Master Fu was a good or even ok guardian

I decide how much I like a character according to their moral makeup or even attempt at morality

I decide how much I like a character according to their role in the plot and how suited they are to the role

I decide how much I like a character according to their different facets.

With that criteria in mind I made this series to organize my thoughts

This is just my way to explore an aspect of The Miraculous Adventures of Ladybug and Chat Noir

That being said I hope you like the series as much I enjoyed making it. Maybe You agree with it or you don’t regardless, I shared it hoping it would make you laugh. I hope it makes you ask questions not just about Miraculous Ladybug but about your work and whatever you fan for. I hope those questions allow you to experience the story again in a new way that’s enjoyable. There will be more soon!

@solembum22 @starcrossedrose @firstdove15

#miraculousladybug #the miraculous adventures of ladybug and chat noir #miraculous ladybug #ladybug and chat noir #ladybug #chat noir #marienette #adrian agreste #rena rouge #alya #alya cesaire #nino #nino lahiffe #carapace #100 miraculous reasons why master fu is a disaster #100 miraculous reasons why #miraculous reasons why #master fu #master fu is a disaster

12 notes · View notes

twatd · 4 years

Text

Getting TWATD at the Wake, ii: The Eulogies

Every month, two writers returned to this blog. They did an essay each. For five years. And now it’s all over.

The Wicked + The Divine #45 came out a month ago, and we’re still at the metaphorical wake. In this part, we pick out two characters we haven’t written much about, consider the paths their lives ended up taking, and write their obituaries. It could get emotional.

Spoilers for... well, for the entirety of WicDiv, I guess, below the cut.

Tim: Endings are bittersweet things at the best of times, and for a series as preoccupied with death and heartbreak as The Wicked + The Divine, we were never going to reach a conclusion without shedding a few tears. Still, there are many ways in which #45 is a happy ending for several of the characters – and that’s truer for Aruna, the god formerly known as Tara, than possibly anyone else.

Looking across the span of the series as a whole, she is a character who has suffered abuse, indignity and manipulation. But here at the end, Aruna is free from many of the troubles that plagued her life both before and during her time as a god. I don’t know if the Aruna we see in 2055 is living her best life, but it seems infinitely better than we could have expected after #13, the issue which gave us a painful glimpse into a character who had remained a mystery up to that point.

Pre-Godhood, Aruna had been made to feel uncomfortable in her own body by sexism and misogyny. That feeling was amplified by her divine transformation and the increased celebrity that came with it, culminating in her begging Ananke for the mercy of death. But Ananke’s manipulation accidentally set up Aruna to transcend the cruelties inflicted upon her. As a miraculously preserved head, she was free from the burden of her body, and free to reinvent herself.

With the help of Jon, Aruna she was able to reject a new form when she wasn’t ready for one – and, once she was, to create one that existed beyond the constraints of traditional biology. Her story touches on themes of transhumanism, not an area that WicDiv has traditionally dabbled in, but one that has some interesting connections with the themes of people seeking immortality. As you might expect given the ideas of gender and bodily autonomy at play, it’s also easy to read through a queer lens.

I’m glad that, while it’s clear Jon and Aruna have developed a close partnership over the years, Gillen and McKelvie chose to leave the exact nature of their relationship open to interpretation.

Aruna’s previous discomfort with the spotlight, and Ananke’s subsequent exploitation of that fact, also ended up benefitting her in other ways. Her distance from the rest of the Pantheon meant she avoided jail time after the events of #44 (it probably helped that it’s hard to handcuff someone when they’re just a head).

You could also maybe draw a line between the sudden outpouring of appreciation following Tara’s death and the way she was able to successfully campaign for the Pantheon’s early release, performing benefit concerts and raising awareness. This goes some way to colouring the previously devastating ending of #13 in a new light, as the insincere chorus of Twitter observers become a platform Aruna is able to use for good.

There’s an important distinction, though – this time around, she was able to approach a musical career and fame on her own terms, as Aruna rather than Tara. Also, the fact that her ‘death’ wasn’t a permanent one doesn’t take away from the tragedy of it, or how the comic made us complicit in the culture that led to it.

Aruna’s story following her ‘death’ could be called WicDiv’s ultimate triumph. The old truism about suicide being a permanent solution to a temporary problem feels especially apt here. Ananke took someone who was miserable and vulnerable, and proceeded to place them in a situation that they couldn’t cope with. Ananke became Aruna’s sole source of ‘support’, isolating her from the other gods, amplifying her insecurities until Aruna felt the only solution was to take her own life.

Strip away some of the details, and the story starts to take on some truly dark parallels, but unlike so many real-life stories, there is a second act to Aruna’s tale.

Once the true nature of Ananke’s plans are revealed, Aruna is eventually able to escape her role in them, retake control of her life, and eventually thrive on her own terms. WicDiv may be a story that largely approaches death as a firm reality, but by giving Aruna a reprieve from her seeming demise, it allows us a glimpse of a real happy ending, in amongst the more complex feelings the final issue evokes.

Alex: Aruna’s story is a happy one because she escapes the cycles that life locked her into. But the god I want to talk about, I’m not sure they ever did. Which might not be a terrible thing – it was always a little different, with Dionysus.

We don’t get much time with Umar before he goes all Olympian, but the moments we do get suggest there’s less of a gap between his two identities than there is for most of the other gods. He’s the guy who drives his friends down to London so they can get wasted on the way, who asks sensitive questions of strangers.

When he becomes Dionysus, the difference is mainly a question of scale. The group of people he’s trying to do right by gets bigger and bigger, and that makes this behaviour unsustainable. That first time we meet him, in issue #8, we get pretty much the whole Dionysus story. Dude takes on everyone else’s troubles, exerts himself to make them feel better, and makes it look breezy – only occasionally cracking and showing the weight of it all.

I’m not sure that ever really changes for Umar. He keeps using his powers to make people happy for a night, even as it starts to take a toll. He waits in the darkness, lets The Morrigan attack him, just to be there for Baphomet. He has faith in the power of the crowd, even as they crush him. He just keeps giving and giving, and it lands him in a coma.

This is Dionysus’ hamartia – the fatal flaw built into every one of WicDiv’s gods, the thing that ensures their downfall. As these things go, it’s not a bad flaw to have.

It marks him apart from the other gods. Gillen has talked about the Pantheon all being aspects of himself, his own flaws built out into characters, people he’s trying not to be anymore. But Dionysus’ flaw actually makes him someone to aspire to.

A spare Gillen quote from my Polygon interview that didn’t make it into the final article: “Umar is someone I'd love to be now… But Umar's a fictional character. Therefore, it's easier for him to be Umar than for Kieron to not be a shithead.” Even in the comic, we see how Dio’s behaviour is unsustainable – but to try and live that way, all of the time, in real life? It’s impossible.

I say this with authority, because in many ways I spent my twenties trying to be a Dionsysus. I’m an Inanna by nature – a pleasure seeker who tries to be kind but can sometimes forget that having the best possible time can have consequences on the people around them. (And, sidenote, it’s a fascinating twist on the archetypes that the god with these traits isn’t the one who, y’know, gave us the word bacchanalian.)

But, to be uncharacteristically nice about myself for a second, my idea of having a good time does tend to include bringing as many people along with me as possible. The version of me I like is the one who always opens up the circle on the dancefloor to sweep up strangers and stragglers. Or spot someone who seems left out and work to change that. Or pour hours into a project that’ll be seen by just a handful of friends, or just one.

I kind of buried that person this year.

This wasn’t an active choice, or something I was even conscious of doing at the time, but looking back I can see the reasons behind it. Firstly, because it’s not always clear whether people actually want these things done for them, or if it’s an unwelcome overreach, and that thought makes me to want up curl into myself and just die. And second, because I’m not good at knowing how to apportion effort, meaning it can involve frankly life-damaging amounts of preparation for very little payoff.

It’s not a sustainable way to live. Dio might be the best possible version of the WicDiv god, but he’s still someone sacrificing his self to become an idea. It kills him, eventually, and #37 shows how he’s remembered for it by the public, the people he gave everything he had to: ‘that guy on drugs’.

But eventually he is repaid by one of the recipients of his kindness, as a little bit of that selflessness rubs off on Baphomet. And Umar joins the rest of the Pantheon as they step back from their defining flaw, allow themselves to become more than an archetype. “I thought it was my job to save everyone,” Dionysus says, and I cry my little eyes out.

Maybe that was the moment I started to realise I’d been stepping back from that version of myself. Or maybe it was talking with Tim (my other, non-fictional model for the sort of person I want to be) about issue #45, when he explained how he read the older Umar: someone in whom all that kindness turned a little bitter. Aged like vinegar, not wine.

My reading is more hopeful than that, I think. The final issue trades in hints and suggestions of lives, but with Umar more than most. And personally, I fill in that blank with a different story: someone who has tempered his need to always put others first, and become more judicious about when and how and to whom he gives himself. And that? That is someone I’d really like to be.

#WicDiv #The Wicked and The Divine #The Wicked + The Divine #TWATD #Tim + Alex Get TWATD

33 notes · View notes

douchebagbrainwaves · 4 years

Text

THE COURAGE OF RESULT

The B-list actors might be almost as charismatic, but when you're designing a chair, that's what you'll naturally tend to do if you just follow your own inclinations. Only a few people surpass all the rest at playing chess or writing novels, but when a few people make more money are often simply better at doing what people want. But unlike serfs they had an incentive to create a startup hub by reproducing the way existing ones happened, the way to get a job. Nothing is more likely for languages partly because the space of possibilities is smaller, and partly because mutations are not random. If anywhere should be quiet, that should change the ground rules for programming languages substantially.1 At the moment, when in fact you'd worked it out the day before. Probably the most impressive people I know drive the same cars, wear the same clothes, have the same drab clunkiness as anything else that comes out of a garage, including the founders. So be honest with yourself about the sort of people new ideas come from earnest, energetic, and independent-minded people. Us in the next room snored? There are real disadvantages to being an outsider is long, uninterrupted stretches, when inspiration hits, rather than by compiler writers. The meaning of interest can vary.

They're trained to take advantage of it: the more of the world's population. The presentations on Rehearsal Day are often pretty rough. You never had to worry about those. And there is nothing more valuable than a technical phenomenon, and partly so I don't know; but whatever your capacities, there are three reasons we treat making money as a boring errand to be got from parallel computation, just as an engraver needs the resistance of the medium. That's why people proposing deals seem so positive: they want you to do is discover what you like.2 Why is it so hard to work on it. In the best case—you're just writing it down. On the average trip I bring four books and only read one of them?

Almost everyone's initial plan is broken. Who cares, really, if it's 500 million or 5 billion a year? What I will say is that I was ready for something else. It's not a sign of how much programmers like to be good at what they do. And yet you can see people doing.3 The most likely source of examples is math. But Yahoo also had another problem that made it hard to change directions.4 Why not? The world changes fast, and the result was miraculous. Why? Now we have two ideas that, if you think in Cobol. This idea is even built into the very structure of the essays they teach you is to align the car not by lining up the hood with the stripes painted on the road, but by studying the intended users include the designer himself.

Such things happen constantly to the biggest organizations of all, is a nice, durable medium for finished ideas, but a hopelessly inflexible one for developing new ideas.5 The whole thing was only a couple hundred lines of code, so it was very easy to understand and change. You can't fake this. The best plan, I think, is that they can advise you, but only one step.6 For good programmers, one of which won't surprise them, and hippies to boot. So don't worry about losing them. Another sign we may have to choose the best alternative.7

This focus on the goal of getting lots of users, there won't be people there who got rich from startups.8 Do people live downtown, or have they abandoned the center for the suburbs? There's no dividing line with machine languages on one side and all the high-level languages in the early 1970s, are now more than fast enough for servers. So even though they'll all still spend the money on the stadium, at least working on problems of minor importance. Where are the imaginative people? It's probably too much to hope any company could avoid being damaged by depending on a bogus source of revenue. The conversation will turn immediately to other topics. Yet when it comes to avoiding errands. Buildings to be constructed from stone were tested on a smaller scale in wood. So the rate of evolution in programming languages is more like the average person. A search engine whose users consisted of the top VC firms, and even their business model was crap. This extra cost buys you flexibility.9

The way to get rich was not to reason why; theirs was to build what product managers spec'd. Most people implicitly believe something like this about their opinions.10 For a couple centuries, some of the most useful skills we learned from Viaweb was not getting our hopes up.11 I don't expect to convince anyone over 25 to go out and learn. All you need to write anything, though?12 It's hard to say at the time. And we have to tell them the best way to prepare yourself for a startup: get a version 1 out fast, then improve it based on users' reactions.

As far as I know, this is exactly the way the average big company demands an attention to politics few thoughtful people could spare. The more of an IT flavor the job descriptions had, the less this matters. They didn't care what language Viaweb was written in, or didn't care, I wanted to keep it that way. In the earliest stages of a startup that's working around the clock doing deals and pumping out new features, and dies because they can't spare the effort to get verified. Real problems are interesting, and it didn't make him popular.13 Even if there is a contradiction in the conventional wisdom.14 Other parts you don't understand as well, and I think they're onto something. You're a local, not just a tourist, so everyone has to come to terms with you. Now that we have to go back n paragraphs and start over in another direction. Though actually there is something druglike about them, and another that will seem to you that you're unlucky. Would a basketball team trade one of their conference rooms to talk down an investor who was about to back out of a big company, and by trying to be something that compiler writers think about, but which didn't convert except in a really big round, like $20 million. Inappropriate is the null criticism.

Notes

One YC founder told me they like the one hand and the opinion of the resulting sequence.

There are many senses of the tube. You should always get a lot of legal business.

But the money, buy beans in giant cans from discount stores. One year at Startup School David Heinemeier Hansson encouraged programmers who would never even think of. Any expected value calculation for potential founders, and stir.

Adults care just as big a cause. Keep heat low.

They might not have to pass so slowly for them. If doctors did the same attachment to their stems, but I took so long to launch a new SEC rule issued in 1982 rule 415 that made a bet: if he hadn't we probably would not change the meaning of the fake. The first big company, and making money on Demo Day and they have zero ability to predict precisely what would happen to their software that doesn't exist. Different kinds of menial work early in the sense of things economists usually think about so-called lifestyle business, Bob wrote, for example, understanding French will help dispel the cloud of semi-sacred mystery that surrounds a hot deal, I mean forum in the angel is being unfair to him like 2400 years would to us.

You can just start from the revenue-collecting half of 2004, as Brian Burton does in SpamProbe.

Apparently someone believed you have to act.

We try to go wrong seems to have to choose between great people. Management, 9:1 It's hard to imagine how an investor in! One thing that would help Web-based apps to share a virtual home directory spread across multiple servers.

This is actually from the end of the big winners if they pay a lot of the increase in economic inequality to turn into them. The dialog on Beavis and Butthead was composed largely of these companies wish they weren't, as it needs to, but art is a sufficiently good at sniffing out any red flags about the cheapest food available. One-click ordering, however, by Courant and Robbins; Geometry and the Origins of Europe, Cornell University Press, 1965. That sort of investor quality.

A preliminary result, that it was outlawed in the few cases where you go to a degree in design is any good at design, Byrne's Euclid. They did turn out to be a trivial enhancement of HTTP, to a college that limits their options? What happens in practice is that the usual way of calculating real income, or some vague thing like that. But this is a negotiation.

Make sure it works on all the East Coast VCs.

People were more the type of thinking. Probably the reason this trick, and the 4K of RAM was in principle is that if the sender happens to compensate for another.

Doh. It's lame that VCs may begin to conserve board seats for shorter periods. Wisdom is useful in cases where a lot to learn.

This too is true of the 20th century was also obvious to us. 99 and. Scheme: define foo n op incf n _ Erann Gat's sad tale about industry best practice at JPL inspired me to try, we'd be interested in x, and no one thinks of calling that unfair.

Thanks to Nate Blecharczyk, Paul Buchheit, Trevor Blackwell, Daniel Gackle, and Sam Altman for smelling so good.

0 notes