Tumgik
#dirty power
awesomecooperlove · 3 months
Text
OBAMA OPENLY ENCOURAGES ILLEGALS TO VOTE
💩👿💩
443 notes · View notes
bestboy-huan · 2 years
Text
The girlboss-ification of Galadriel bothers me so much. In the books, in Tolkien’s works, Galadriel is a powerful political leader, even by the second age. She is a princess of the Noldor, the daughter of Finarfin. She is proud and respected.
In the Rings of Power, she is nothing more than a bitter commander in Gil-Galad’s army. She can’t even control her own subordinates. (They call her “Commandeer Galadriel” not “Lady Galadriel”!) She is ignored by Gil-Galad and condescended to by Elrond, she is dismissed and rebuked. She has no influence and no status of her own. So far in the show, her motivation is just vengeance and her own trauma, there is no greater consideration of the fate of Middle-Earth, no political aspirations, no nothing. Her identity becomes one of being Finrod’s little sister, not a leader of her own.
In the Unfinished Tales, there are many inconsistencies in Galadriel’s history, but none of them suggest this powerlessness and this humiliation.
I don’t care if they make her out to be a warrior or not, I don’t care if she leads people into battle or not, I do care about her political power.
They say they are centering female characters, which would be great, except they are disempowering her. I would much rather see a woman in a position of influence and respect, than one who is good with a sword. This is Galadriel, who refused Feanor, one of the greatest elves of all time, when he asked for a strand of her hair, and in Rings of Power she becomes a cast-away who is thrown around, ignored, and manhandled by those around her.
I understand the need to have room for character development and growth, but this is not that. It’s such a performative attempt at feminism, she is a classic 2010 female protagonist. One who is good at fighting, who is the underdog, who doesn’t allow herself to be kind or gentle or have emotional vulnerability, because the writers forgot what female empowerment actually looks like. A woman with dignity and political power is so much more important than a woman who can carry a sword.
5K notes · View notes
shadowsight · 8 months
Text
the magic system (or lack of one) in warriors is so funny. like the sisters have hereditary powers (except sometimes I guess rip to needleclaw's powers that she doesn't have) but then sol is just some guy who maybe has powers but maybe is just really persuasive and somehow knows about astronomy but then the three have powers that were given to defend starclan but starclan doesn't know where they came from either and also leafpool and squirrelflight are telepathic but only for like a month??
440 notes · View notes
panharmonium · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Mama, please, the phone.
177 notes · View notes
wroteclassicaly · 4 months
Text
I feel like people forget that Nancy did cheat on Steve. And she didn’t want him for an entire year. She basically stayed with him as backup. She “waited” for Jonathan. I’m not saying he’s perfect, but if we wanna compare actions… he was treated like garbage too. Neither of them are saintly, but I feel like his being cheated on is always overlooked.
163 notes · View notes
monocub · 4 months
Text
you think dadan would have dressed up as santa and gifted the asl boys coal for christmas and those little assholes would've complained and started throwing it at her
161 notes · View notes
bicheetopuff · 5 months
Text
I think the people complaining about AFOs back story have forgotten what his character represents.
He’s a manipulative rich old man that wants to own and monopolize every major resource in the world so that he can be considered a god.
His entire being is a metaphor for major corporations and every politician and billionaire ceo ever… so him being a narcissistic and greedy kid isn’t at all surprising. He doesn’t have a traumatizing backstory because he’s a manipulative power hungry chump like he has been the entire series.
179 notes · View notes
devilheartsblog · 14 days
Text
Tumblr media
Important thing
Thanks writers for forgetting about Bloom’s healing powers she used to revive Sky in Season 2. Can’t work on a wizard oh no no no
77 notes · View notes
awesomecooperlove · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
America’s Buried History of White Slavery
The best way to forget history is to rewrite it. And in the rewriting, to carefully delete references to any historical events or circumstances we find uncomfortable.
Thus, American history books are totally silent on the matter of these white slaves, mostly of European stock with a great number of Irish, but also English and Scottish, who were kidnapped or otherwise forcibly deported to the US as slave labor.
In fact, an examination of available documentation indicates that white slavery in the Americas was a much more extensive operation than was black slavery, and the numbers may be severely under-estimated
Source
Join us: t.me/cruelhistory
💔💔💔
410 notes · View notes
bismuth-soup · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
confession: posting selfies on the internet is the only reason I exercise/clean my room
186 notes · View notes
natjennie · 1 month
Text
just seeing brennan and nathan in the same room in "pencils down" has taken my desire for a drawfee d20 season from a want to a need.
101 notes · View notes
ivansocute · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
AmeRus silly doodles I did few days ago
Also I'm new to hetalia fandom in tumblr, nice to meet you. You can call me Eepy I guess-
61 notes · View notes
falconfate · 1 month
Text
Hello ranger’s apprentice fandom can we talk real quick about the stupidest thing Flanagan ever wrote
It’s about the bows. Yanno, the rangers’ Iconique™️ main weapon. That one. You know the one.
Flanagan. Flanagan why are your rangers using longbows.
“uh well recurve arrows drop faster” BUT DO THEY. FLANAGAN. DO THEY.
the answer is no they don’t. Compared to a MODERN, COMPOUND (aka cheating) bow, yes, but compared to a longbow? Y’know, what the rangers use in canon? Yeah no a recurve actually has a FLATTER trajectory. It drops LATER.
This from an article comparing the two:
“Both a longbow and a recurve bow, when equipped with the right arrow and broadhead combination, are capable of taking down big game animals. Afterall, hunters have been doing it for centuries with both types of bows.
However, generally speaking and all things equal, a recurve bow will offer more arrow speed, creating a flatter flight trajectory and retain more kinetic energy at impact.
The archers draw length, along with the weight of the arrow also affect speed and kinetic energy. However, the curved design of the limbs on a recurve adds to its output of force.”
It doesn’t actually mention ANY distance in range! And this is from a resource for bow hunting, which, presumably, WOULD CARE ABOUT THAT SORT OF THING!
Okay so that’s just. That’s just the first thing.
The MAIN thing is that even accounting for “hur dur recurves drop faster” LONGBOWS ARE STILL THE STUPID OPTION.
Longbows, particularly and especially ENGLISH longbows, are—as their name suggests—very long. English longbows in particular are often as tall or taller than their wielder even while strung, but especially when unstrung. An unstrung longbow is a very long and expensive stick, one that will GLADLY entangle itself in nearby trees, other people’s clothes, and any doorway you’re passing through.
And yes, there are shorter longbows, but at that point if you’re shortening your longbow, just get a goddamn recurve. And Flanagan makes a point to compare his rangers’ bows to the Very Long English Longbow.
Oh, do you know how the Very Long English Longbow was mostly historically militarily used? BY ON-FOOT ARCHER UNITS. Do you know what they’re TERRIBLE for? MOUNTED ARCHERY.
Trust me. Go look up right now “mounted archery longbow.” You’ll find MAYBE one or two pictures of some guy on a horse struggling with a big stick; mostly you will actually see either mounted archers with RECURVES, or comparisons of Roman longbow archers to Mongolian horse archers (which are neat, can’t lie, I love comparing archery styles like that).
Anyway. Why are longbows terrible for mounted archery? Because they’re so damn long. Think about it: imagine you’re on a horse. You’re straddling a beast that can think for itself and moves at your command, but ultimately independently of you; if you’re both well-trained enough, you’re barely paying attention to your horse except to give it commands. And you have a bow in your hands. If your target is close enough to you that you know, from years of shooting experience, you will need to actually angle your bow down to hit it because of your equine height advantage, guess what? If you have a longbow, YOU CAN’T! YOUR HORSE IS IN THE WAY BECAUSE YOUR BOW IS TOO LONG! Worse, it’s probably going to get in the general area of your horse’s shoulder or legs, aka moving parts, which WILL injure your horse AND your bow and leave you fresh out of both a getaway vehicle and a ranged weapon. It’s stupid. Don’t do it.
A recurve, on the other hand, is short. It was literally made for horse archers. You have SO much range of motion with a recurve on horseback; and if you’re REALLY good, you know how to give yourself even more, with techniques like Jamarkee, a Turkish technique where you LITERALLY CAN AIM BACKWARDS.
For your viewing enjoyment, Serena Lynn of Texas demonstrating Jamarkee:
Tumblr media
Yes, that’s real! This type of draw style is INCREDIBLY versatile: you can shoot backwards on horseback, straight down from a parapet or sally port without exposing yourself as a target, or from low to the ground to keep stealthy without banging your bow against the ground. And, while I’m sure you could attempt it with a longbow, I wouldn’t recommend it: a recurve’s smaller size makes it far more maneuverable up and over your head to actually get it into position for a Jamarkee shot.
A recurve just makes so much more SENSE. It’s not a baby bow! It’s not the longbow’s lesser cousin! It’s a COMPLETELY different instrument made to be used in a completely different context! For the rangers of Araluen, who put soooo much stock in being stealthy and their strong bonds with their horses, a recurve is the perfect fit! It’s small and easily transportable, it’s more maneuverable in combat and especially on horseback, it offers more power than a longbow of the same draw weight—really, truly, the only advantage in this case that a longbow has over the recurve is that longbows are quicker and easier to make. But we KNOW the rangers don’t care about that, their KNIVES use a forging technique (folding) that takes several times as long as standard Araluen forging practices at the time!
Okay.
Okay I think I’m done. For now.
71 notes · View notes
unsanctitude · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
fuck them kids
670 notes · View notes
forget-me-ghost · 2 months
Text
Do you guys ever think that Alastor was beefing with Lucifer wasn't only bcs he was intimidated by him, but also out of fear of being replaced?
He did get really defensive about parts of the Hotel that Lucifer didn't like, because he made those parts. The bar? He brought it there. Even in the song he was trying to prove to Charlie that he is useful, that he did so much already and is still helping with the Hotel.
Tbh, it's very reasonable for Al to be mad at this. Like, what do you mean I've been here since day one and this deadbeat father will take my place? Even if Alastor is there only bcs of the deal he made, he still did a lot of things while Luci hid in his palace on the end of Hell (or wherever).
Personally, I think about it a lot.
65 notes · View notes
logandria · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
✨Medusa ✨
(an illustration for a silk scarf)
197 notes · View notes