themes!!
casual kindness
never giving up hope not even for a second!!
everybody is in earnest, even if it's painfully so
self sacrificing love
but that doesn't come out of self hatred that comes out of love for everyone including themselves
joy in one another and in nature
willingness to work hard to benefit everyone
characters!!
judith 'magpie' holmes
strengths: sees the best in everyone, easily trusting
weaknesses: overconfidence
neutral: likes shiny things
magic(?): rudimentary communication with birds
erin 'dormouse' campbell
strengths: easily trusting, thinks deeply
weaknesses: mild self esteem issues, lack of confidence
neutral: favourite colour is green
magic(?): brilliant tracker
daniel 'kingfisher' martin
strengths: unshakeable optimism, gentleness
weaknesses: able to be easily led astray
neutral: lots of hand gestures
magic(?): exceptionally good at diving and holding his breath underwater
roberta 'tortoise' carter
strengths: deep thinker, carefully considers all options
weaknesses: can be indecisive
neutral: good at dancing
magic(?): everything grows faster when she's around
anna 'robin' mccartney
strengths: reminding everyone of God's goodness, hopeful, gentleness
weaknesses: can be overbearing, sometimes leaves others behind by accident
neutral: moves quickly
magic(?): rudimentary communication with animals, generally prey animals
grace 'dolphin' andrews
strengths: kind, patient, stubborn
weaknesses: has difficulty letting go of preconceived notions, jumps to conclusions
neutral: has the most intoxicating laugh
magic(?): can sprint or swim long distances without being tired or out of breath
patrick 'fox' andrews
strengths: very much in earnest, quick-witted, stubborn
weaknesses: can be sarcastic and occasionally nasty because of it, can accidentally talk over others
neutral: brother to grace
magic(?): can jump incredibly high
ryan 'elephant' rogers
strengths: good at picking up patterns, patient
weaknesses: can be prejudiced
neutral: ends up going home to his uncle and hence passing out of the story
magic(?): incredibly strong
?? 'panda' nolan
strengths: extreme enthusiasm and is very quick to hype others up
weaknesses: prone to constant small lies
neutral:
magic(?):
?? 'snow leopard' scrooge
thaddeus 'tadpole' scrooge
strengths: very trusting, sees the best in everyone
weaknesses: slightly prone to being whiny
neutral: originally nicknamed frog, snowy is his big brother, is the BONUS CHILDLING
magic(?): can talk to frogs
pollyanna 'pollywog' scrooge
strengths: hopeful and upbeat
weaknesses: can be unrealistic in expectations
neutral: sister to snowy and tad
magic(?): can fit through small spaces nobody else can even tad
60 notes
·
View notes
Good adaptations aren't scene by scene, line by line reenactments of a book. It's a completely different medium, that the creators can use to tell the story a different way. Besides budget issues (just writing a scene where a bunch of crazy stuff happens costs about $0, while portraying it on screen is a different matter), the pacing/flow is different in live action stuff than books.
The SPIRIT of the adaptation is what matters. The original PJO movies weren't bad because Annabeth's hair was brown or they didn't say the dialogue straight from the book or dare I argue, because they mixed in elements from further in the series. Rather, it was bad because the vibe was simply far too edgy. Percy was sassy, it did have humor, monsters were fine, but it fell flat on its face because it didn't understand its characters, its world, or its TONE. THE TONE. It was genuinely awful.
Good adaptations expand on the source material without losing the charm of the original. They understand what makes characters tick and what's at the core of the journey, its not about aesthetics or being faithful to the point of being dull and having nothing new to say.
The PJO series is doing that. Having Rick involved probably helped a lot. It has a rocky start, in my opinion. But from the second half of ep. 2 and into ep. 3, I see it gaining its footing.
39 notes
·
View notes
The Terror fandom is so funny to me because the show is so popular (as it should be, it's great), but I've never seen a single person say that the show made them want to read the book or anyone who's read the book saying that show fans should read the book. And as someone who has read the book (albeit more than ten years ago), this is one of the rare occasions on which the adaptation significantly, SIGNIFICANTLY improves on many aspects of the book.
Friends. Do not read the book. Trust me when I say you are probably happier this way. And I say this as someone who ten (fifteen?) years ago really loved the book but looking back...uh...what the fuck was that.
7 notes
·
View notes
ATTENTION!!
@cf8wrk4u-us @bluekat12345 @sassysaltuna or @cattalystic @rbaddicctorfigitory @azula-nyx @mk-wizard @vixxelle @moroccos-apprentice @weonbullshit @sphnyspinspin @luciolefire @angelbroad @whirltherescuebot @frosty-tian @multi-fandom13 @sonicnerd @thicctails @shapeshiftingcloud @fruity-ace @melishade @sweetpeaches666 @mikiusol @guardian-of-fandoms and anybody else?
I HAVE CHANGED MY NAME! SEE!! PLEASE DON'T FORGET ME!!!
21 notes
·
View notes
So Kevin has decided to post a reply:
Im not quiet sure how to collect my thoughts but after reading through it a few times:
Its more of a defense then an apology, and, its not a very good defense
He doesnt mention the transphobia or antisemitism by name. Which means he still doesnt understand exactly why people were hurt.
He doesn't think buying something means you are making endorsement of others views, but what about taking a sponsorship and making money off of it?
He doesn't address that this was a sponsored game, that he was sponsored to play a game that is surrounded in controversy, and that his defense at best is "Im too much of a hermit to care to look into who pays me money"
Which again, is irresponsible at best, and at worst, means he will probably fuck up like this again.
All in all, its annoying to see how many people are patting him on the back and saying shit like "I knew kevin had good intentions, his cluelessness is excusable".
I personally cant use my one lifetime to spend energy on people who I have proof that they would sell out the queer/jewish community for some cash.
42 notes
·
View notes
honestly, cia, if anything, pwede mo siyang tangalin sa lahat ng storyline mo as if he never even existed kasi i follow other people that don’t even include him or mention him. of course, choice mo, pero gusto ko lang sabihin sayo na ang daming tao that feels uncomfortable seeing him or mentioning him. kaya mo yan ‘te!!
thank you sobra! naguiguilty ako at first kasi tao din naman siya pero di talaga ako mapakali pag nakikita ko siya parang may something sa ilalim ng skin ko na gusto kong itanggal kasi sobrang... di ko maexplain basta same yung feeling na yun sa feeling na mag isang maglakad sa gabi
but for my writing i decided na i'm gonna delete stuff na ive already written centering him with hannah that's unimportant, but i dont know if i have the time to rewrite the smaller involvements and mentions due to the amount ive already written, so things may remain unchanged
but everything i write from now on will avoid him. he may exist in hannah's universe but i'm not gonna allude to him at all.
3 notes
·
View notes
Absolute theory/headcanon/analysis/general idea legend whatudottu character arc of slowly becoming one of the four (4) Cerebrocrustacean fans in the entire fandom (even if Petrosapiens will always be #1 in its heart, which, you know, completely understandable NGL) let’s gooooo!
Also I can’t believe I haven’t made this connection until now but:
Cerebrocrustacean: “My people have a rich and complex history and culture, but most of the galactic audience boils us down to being nothing but ‘the violently bigoted xenophobes who keep destroying their own planet’ and it frustrates me to no end.”
Gourmand who’s been forced to hear the same “I can excuse cannibalism but I draw the line at marrying outside of your own race” joke over and over again: “Yeah, welcome to the club, pal.”
Me and my homies (4) being cerebrocrustacean fans: If cerebrocrustaceans have 0 fans we are dead, haha- Would buy merchandise to convince CN that Brainstorm is a cool transformation *looks over my shoulder to see the playdough brainstorm with removable brain toy that either I or my sibling got millions of years ago*
ANYWAY!
It's very evident when I don't think about a particular species when I have to look something up like the gourmand cannibalism, but seeing as though they have a collective pocket dimension where their stomach goes (at least that's where the logic got them in the show instead of being consumed food expelled in energy reflux), if cannibalism didn't implode the two gourmands like how bag of holding inception works then I suppose it's far better than *shudders* perk murk relationships. Got a whole 'house divided' 'alike in dignity' situation over here, Perkulet and Murktague having asses-
...You know what if I get a chance to think about gourmands in more detail I might turn that pocket dimension into a magic thing instead of a xenobiology thing that's just overall bullshit- comes free with potentially real cannibalism but like they've eaten 11 planets I think cannibalism just in general pales in comparison to what they could do-
Well, whatever cannibalism gourmands excuse and all the jokes they have to deal with about perk murk relationships being somehow much much worse, at least they don't get shoveled with 'violent bigots' that 'aren't smart enough to support their lifestyle without destroying their own planet' which well- I don't have any present headcanons as to why Encephalonus is on it's 4th edition yet but let me tell you, when cerebrocrutaceans found out the galvans lost their planet (admittedly to the Highbreed Invasion) and then galvans WEREN'T immediately assumed to have fucked up somewhere, you can bet that Dr Psychobos was one in the crowd that went absolutely livid.
6 notes
·
View notes