Tumgik
#so much ranting
queer-is-future · 7 months
Text
so when straight people ask me why I say I’m “queer” or “gay” instead of sharing my actual identity as a panromantic demisexual non-binary sapphic queer I just tell them “ok look, when you’re talking to someone who isn’t local and they ask you where you’re from and you either say the name of the largest city nearby or ‘town name, suburb of large nearby city’ so they can get some geographical context of where you’re located right, bc they’re probably not going to know the name of the little town you actually live in.”
but if you’re talking to a local you can say the name of your actual town bc they have a greater chance of knowing where/what that is.
ok well when I’m talking to a straight person I start with queer bc chances are they aren’t as familiar with the context of all the little towns in that big queer city and need gps (gay positioning system) to find me.
if I’m talking to another queer person and I say I live in a suburb of gay city in a town called panromantic on the demisexual side of the tracks which is in the county of queer and I live off the intersection of non-binary and sapphic, they’d probably be able to find me with little to no problems, make sense?
66K notes · View notes
zomblorbs · 5 months
Text
i wish there wasn’t such a stigmatized view on platonically loving people.
I can’t call people nicknames and pet names like hun and honey without them immediately assuming i have romantic interest in them.
i can’t tell my friends i love them without adding on “platonically” or shortening the phrase “ily” “love you” “love u”
i love a lot of people. i love my sister, i love my boyfriend, and i love my best friend. All different versions of love.
let us love people openly and honestly without it being seen as “making a move” or being romantically interested.
please please please stop assuming that love is strictly romantic, i promise you life becomes so much brighter and bigger when you stop keeping love strictly romantic.
39K notes · View notes
sameboot · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
Simon petrikov coping FAIL compilation
10K notes · View notes
autolenaphilia · 8 months
Text
It's funny how clearly uninformed a lot of criticism of Mozilla and its browser Firefox is. Like people say "it's just another corporation, out to make profit, just like Google." And that ordinary users promoting Firefox are just giving them free advertising.
It's in basically any post criticizing Mozilla, including on this site. Like using tumblr search I quickly found a post that was largely positive, but argued that Mozilla operates "under capitalist incentives" And outside tumblr I found a blog post out on the interwebs that criticized Mozilla and outright wondered "I don't know if Mozilla's business model ever made sense, it makes a lot more sense if it's something closer to a nonprofit rather than a commercial entity."
Well, let's research the Mozilla Corporation, see what that business model actually is. Let's begin that research by going to the wikipedia article, and read the two introductory paragraphs. And it turns out that it's "a wholly owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation", which is a non-profit.
"The Mozilla Foundation will ultimately control the activities of the Mozilla Corporation and will retain its 100 percent ownership of the new subsidiary. Any profits made by the Mozilla Corporation will be invested back into the Mozilla project. There will be no shareholders, no stock options will be issued and no dividends will be paid. The Mozilla Corporation will not be floating on the stock market and it will be impossible for any company to take over or buy a stake in the subsidiary."
Turns out that it is not just "closer to a non-profit", it is literally a non-profit. Turns out you only needed two paragraphs on wikipedia to learn that, the most basic online research possible, which basically every post I found criticizing Mozilla failed to do.
This is entirely different from any other entity calling itself corporation, which is all about creating profit or money for its shareholders, the "capitalist incentives" spoken about earlier.
If you read further into that article, you will learn that the Mozilla corporation literally only exists separate from the foundation for tax and legal purposes, but it's still a non-profit operation.
This makes it reasonably immune from the enshittification process I've written about before. there is no incentive to fuck over the experience for end users for the sake of shareholder profits, like what tumblr is doing right now.
It means that Firefox is an exemption to the rule that "if something is free, you are the product", because there is no product to produce profits for shareholders, it's a charitable endeavour for a free and open internet, as laid out in the Mozilla manifesto.
This doesn't mean non-profits make corruption impossible, there is plenty of corruption in non-profit foundations. But unlike actual capitalist corporations, it doesn't have the greed and corruption built in. And if you are going to criticize Mozilla and Firefox, which it does sometimes deserve, you should have your basic facts straight before doing so, if you expect me to take you seriously.
14K notes · View notes
dapper-lil-arts · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
and somehow, that only makes her fall in love more
4K notes · View notes
lovethistoomuch · 2 years
Text
I've been on a bit ob a Russell Crowe movie binge in the past few weeks and since he is almost sixty now, many of the movies I've watched were consequently older movies. and when I watched them, it struck me again, how much hollywood has changed in the last few decades when it comes to depicting men.
take Gladiator for example from the year 2000. Russell Crowe plays basically an action hero in it. he is a big, muscly dude, who is very strong and uses that strength to defeat his enemies. and this is what he looks like:
Tumblr media
looks like a strong man, right?
in the same year, Hugh Jackman as Wolverine looked like this in the first X-men movie:
Tumblr media
in 2013 the same character played by the same actor looked like this:
Tumblr media
it's a bit much, isn't it? I mean, he looks so skinny.
and if we go even further back: look at what the womanizer character Face from the A-team looked like in the 80s show vs the 2010 movie reboot:
Tumblr media
maybe the difference isn't that big but it really startled me when I watched that movie for the first time. in my mind there was no reason why Face should be particularly muscular since he is the charming one not the one known for being particularly strong.
if we go even further back, look at the charmin womanizer character Hawkeye in M*A*S*H from the 70's.
Tumblr media
I know he's a doctor and there is no reason for him to be ripped but I got the feeling if they did the show now, he would be.
I don't know what my point really is I'm just saying I got a bit nostalgic when watching these men. I cannot be the only one who'd rather see more of this:
Tumblr media
than this:
Tumblr media
also, as a sidenote: Russell Crowe gained a lot of weight for the nice guys and he is a fucking powerhouse in that film, like, when he punches someone, you really feel it because of the weight that is behind it and the shere mass of his body.
Tumblr media
(even if this may look different, he's about to break Ryan Gosling's character's arm. I couldn't find a gif of him punching someone but I swear it looks painfull as hell.)
so, in short: can we get big, heavy action guys back? cause I'm tired of seeing these skinny, despite being muscular dudes who look dehydrated as hell and on steroids.
and can we stop making characters ripped just for the sake of it? cause I'd rather cuddle with a guy looking like Hawkeye than one looking like Face from the new A-team movie.
56K notes · View notes
ladymariayuri · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
how cats see themselves when they haven't been fed for 5 minutes
3K notes · View notes
hollis-art · 8 months
Text
i saw someone spread hate to Keiko bc they were a Bashir/O'brien shipper, and i do NOT agree with that.
why would you ever say such things when this was always an option?
Tumblr media
this is obviously what's happening in the show anyways
6K notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
2.12 Chimney Begins - 2.09 Hen Begins - 2.16 Bobby Begins Again - 7.04 Buck, Bothered and Bewildered
Tommy's family arc
2K notes · View notes
tinyself01 · 2 months
Text
Reminder, there is no such thing as a wannar3xic UNLESS it’s a person faking an 3D who isn’t scared of the c@lories and is just doing it to impress people, but can easily go back to 3ating whatever whenever.
You are NOT a wannar3xic because you @te a little over your limit or you @te maintenance for a few days or b!nged. It causes you extreme fear, when normally food isn’t supposed to cause fear.
You tear yourself up when you go over your limit or when you b!nge, that’s because you have an 3D. You can’t help it. It’s a mental disorder.
Something I’ve learned when I was in recovery is the reason you b!nge is because your body kicks into survival mode when it thinks there’s no f00d around for you to survive, so it’ll grasp what it can to keep you alive. B!nging is NOT your fault. You don’t have to blame yourself even though it feels like it’s your fault. Your body is just trying to keep you alive. (The survival instinct is carried onto us from our ancestors back when humans had to fight to survive and hunt for their own f00d)
In conclusion, you are not a wannar3xic. If you eat under 1,200/day (or higher but do high amounts of exercise), you ARE sick (3D). Because extreme deficits is not a normal thing for the average person. For non-sick people, 1,200kc@ls is considered d@ngerously low.
2K notes · View notes
dietcherrylvr · 29 days
Text
If I can’t be pretty at least let me be skinny.
2K notes · View notes
kait-bait8 · 5 months
Text
I will never stop thinking about the fact that the Hunger Games was canonically a drunk hypothetical. It wasn’t some great government scheme.
So many bad dystopian novels that have some crazy world building premise make it seem like some great creation from powerful minds. Some great construction. Think of City of Ember with its box or Divergent with its weird scientists(??) or The Selection with its bachelor premise, they are always “grandly designed.” Even in Catching Fire with the Quarter Quells the Games give off an air of grand planning.
But the hunger games were a HYPOTHETICAL. A crazy, extreme, what if. They were never supposed to exist. They were never supposed to be real.
Who wouldn’t drink themselves to death knowing they thought of the idea in the first place?
3K notes · View notes
healthandfitness966 · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
I’m not hungry… I’m sad
I’m not hungry… I’m sad
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
I’m not hungry… I’m sad.
1K notes · View notes
kittxtakt · 1 year
Text
slow progress is still progress
7K notes · View notes
boni-pebble · 4 months
Text
"you're pretty just the way you are" but i could be so much better and skinnier, then i could be even more pretty. and i will be.
2K notes · View notes
millielo · 3 months
Text
The TikTok people have another word for the 2014 Tumblr thigh Gap now: Legging legs.
lol. Twelve year old girls will never be allowed to just live in peace🫠
1K notes · View notes