Fake baby birds.
For some reason there have been a lot of incorrect and even fake images of baby birds going around. Perhaps you saw the AI generated fake baby peacock? The baby crow is a real photo of a real young avian... but it's not a crow (Turns out this fluffy little one is a baby rail-- more info here at the "corvid research blog" which has been mad about this photo for like years. )
Over on the Fediverse (most call it 'Mastodon') there are a lot of people posting about science and nature. @
[email protected], Carl T. Bergstrom shared his photo of a (real) fledgling crow just a few hours out of the nest... just look:
What a little curmudgeon! Look at the too big beak and feet! The "so done with it" corvid gaze.
This bird looks like the kind of kid who spends all their time talking to whatever adults will listen about their obsession with traffic light timing. At first? It's kinda cute and a little annoying, but then it
gets really interesting because it turns out some of the light timing problems are related to graph theory---(this got way too specific... But you know the type right? Always calls you Mr. ___ or Mrs. ___ even if you tell them not to?)
If you love corvids you should follow Carl T. Bergstrom over on the Fediverse. Every day there's new drama with these guys.
38 notes
·
View notes
WTF is Up Wid Dis?
Over the last 2 weeks, Tumblr has been sending me "followers" who have nothing on their pages, all using scantily clad females wanting to be my "friend". I block them all, but their numbers are ridiculous. Obviously attempts to spam/scam, so a word to those idiots doing this - I block shit like this. Go spam/scam a billionaire - that would help us all.
7 notes
·
View notes
Fake Jenna pic returns
Not all fakes are naughty pictures. Serious Jenna Coleman fans know she’s never (at least to date) posed nude or in a bikini or in bondage-style leather, so when those pics turn up from time to time in a Google image search with her head pasted on someone else’s body, you can ignore or be annoyed by them or both. And just to address the elephant in the room, at the present time the only topless images of Jenna in existence are screen captures taken from the stairwell scene in Room at the Top. Everything else is fake in that arena as well unless she’s planning some surprises in Sandman, Klokkenluider or Wilderness.
But some fakes are sneaky because they aren’t edgy or sexy or anything of that nature.
I’ve seen a few variations with different T-shirts. This one turned up today on Instagram. Problem is it’s a fake. Jenna’s face and a little bit of her hair from next to her right eye is taken from this image she posted to Instagram while she was making Me Before You:
It’s easy to tell the fake because the T-shirt is mirrored but Jenna’s face is not - her left eyebrow is distinctive so you can instantly tell when her face has been mirrored, but in this case Jenna’s original photo was not mirrored as the words on the water bottle are the right way around. In the fake, the hair covers the fact part of Jenna’s face is covered by the bottle.
As fakes go, it’s quite good and it has fooled a lot of people. But it’s still a fake.
4 notes
·
View notes
AIn’t Real
Take a look at the image above.
What do you see?
At first blink, from the clothes and hair it seems to be a photo from the mid-1970s to early 1980s.
Blink again.
I’m not a professional photographer but I do know something about the science and history of picture taking, and this doesn’t share either the tone or the texture of genuine photos from that era.
I’m not referring here to color faded snapshots but professional photos of the era. I know something about the various film stocks used at that time; each one has its own unique color warmth and grain texture.
Old negatives create images on microscopic particles of silver suspended in the film’s emulsion. Depending on how many and how fine the particles were and how sensitive they were to light, the resulting image would display varying degrees of grain from the very rough to the very smooth. None of those film stocks look anything like this.
So that alerted my radar and I looked closer at the image.
Check the shadows at the feet of the two figures. They’re almost jet black on a bright and sunny day. Ambient spill light would lighten it enough to discern asphalt texture beneath it.
Further, not only do the shadows not match up with the figures supposedly casting them, they don’t match up with the shadow from the car itself.
Take a look at that car, particularly the license plate. There’s a couple of readable letters and numbers on it, but there are also symbols that resemble letters and numbers but aren’t actual letters or numbers.
Finally, wot da hell is going on atop the car? Some kind of Lovecraftian horror?
AI generated image.
Not real.
Now what’s the big deal about this, you ask?
Most people at first glance see the image, interpret it as a photo from the mid-1970s to early 1980s, ///accept it as genuine///, and scroll on.
I’m different because of my background and experience; I saw clues that tipped me this wasn’t real.
So what’s the harm? If it had been a photorealistic work of hand drawn art, would it be problematic?
Not if identified as such.
But this image was prompted to look as much like a genuine photo as possible.
As noted most people see it, register it in their mind, then scroll on.
This image -- in and of itself -- is harmless.
But imagine images that look real at a brief glance that shape you opinion and views on something.
Nothing extreme, no shots of celebrities doing outrageous acts, but let’s say a politician seen in close proximity of a person accused of bribing politicians.
The meeting never occurred, but you seen the image and without recognizing it was AI generated, you accepted it -- and the implied relationship -- as real.
See where that leads us?
This is not a new phenomenon. Political campaigns have doctored photos for generations, hoping to trick viewers into believing something that didn’t happen…
…did.
Sometimes it’s accomplished by skillful editing, cropping out elements that entirely change the meaning of the photo.
Sometimes it’s accomplished by surreptitiously adding an element, adding a person to a photo who wasn’t there.
Sometimes it’s accomplished by overlaying the face of one figure over the body of another, creating the impression they did something they didn’t do.
Most people don’t pay close attention to what they consume.
The nice thing about poison is that you’ll see the results PDQ.
Fake photos can take a lifetime to kill you.
© Buzz Dixon
0 notes
So many of you are genuinely monsters and you think you're the heroes. Forgive me for not believing that any of you ever actually gave a shit about Palestinians, as you sit here in your pro-hamas rallies with swastika flags while you chant "gas the jews!" and tear down posters of kidnapped hostages. You glorify Hamas, the terrorist organization that uses and abuses Palestinians, that shoots them if they try to evacuate from zones that Israel has warned they're going to strike.
You have been silent for decades while Lebanon and Jordan keep their Palestinian population in refugee camps. You have been silent when no other neighboring country has given Palestinians citizenship status that would enable them to live a comfortable, normal life. You were silent when Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hamas rockets misfire and kill innocent Palestinians. You were silent when Hamas steals aid meant for civilians. You were silent when Hamas dug up water pipes from the ground so that they could make more rockets.
If you were silent then, you're using Palestinians as a mask for your Jew-hatred. If you want to really advocate for Palestinians, keep the same energy for every country, not just the only Jewish state, and try to educate yourself on what Israelis have been doing to try to help Palestinians, because I promise you it's way more than you've ever done in your life.
741 notes
·
View notes