Las cuatro vidas del Malolo
A las once de la mañana del 15 de mayo de 1949 hacía su primera entrada al puerto de Barcelona el paquebote Atlantic de la compañía Home Lines, quedó atracado en el Muelle de San Bertrán en donde lo estaban esperando las autoridades portuarias, así como representantes de la consignataria Hijos de M. Condeminas entre otros.
El paquebote Atlantic en el puerto de Barcelona (imagen de Carlos Pérez de…
View On WordPress
2 notes
·
View notes
Not on the asks list, but care to share some hebrew-knower insight?
disclaimer that i'm not really a hebrew-knower, i basically only know enough to get through synagogue services. i'm mostly useless when it comes to modern hebrew.
anyway, you're correct in that hebrew doesn't have j, as a phoneme or as a letter. hebrew has י, which is phonetically equivalent to the english y, although it also sort of functions as a vowel in certain contexts (for example חי "chai" which means life)*.
i guess part of what's tricky about transliterating is that the latin alphabet is used for so many different languages and so many of its letters are not consistent in pronunciation, whether it be between languages or even within the same language. so in english j is typically /dʒ/ while in spanish it's more like /x/ or /h/ depending on dialect, and in german and other languages it's more like /j/. to make matters more confusing of course, that hebrew י is pronounced /j/.
so there's no equivalent to english j in hebrew, but due to, like, linguistic history and hundreds of years of translating the bible, a lot of hebrew words with י in them got changed to j or i in transl(iter)ation. you see this a lot in names: יִצְחָק (yitzhak) -> isaac, יְרוּשָׁלַיִם (yerushalayim) -> jerusalem
as far as modern transliteration goes, though, i think english transliterations of hebrew generally use "y" in place of "י". using "j" would be kind of misleading to an english reader considering that "j" represents a different phoneme in english as opposed to other languages. i guess if a german speaker were transliterating hebrew it would make sense. but י in hebrew words/names getting turned into j (/dʒ/) in english is more of a translation than a transliteration.
english j (/dʒ/) can be spelled in modern hebrew but it uses a different letter. it's ג׳. which is like a hard g with a diacritic added. kind of in the same way that english g is hard but softened to /dʒ/ when followed by e or i? it's used for transliteration or loan words, though, it's not really a native hebrew phoneme.
*as a sidenote, ח is pronounced /x/, like the "ch" in german. so i guess if you wanted to piss people off you could transliterate "חי" as "jaj" lol
2 notes
·
View notes
🔥unpopular charles opinion
The thing is, it’s not an opinion, really. The question isn’t meant to be a complaint or a rebuttal or anything. I just genuinely don’t get it! The question goes something like this.
So Charles/Klinger seems to be the one actively disliked ship in the fandom, discounting the h*nn*hawk vs p*erc*ntyre gang war and that one rabidly anti-hawnk person (lol). Most nobody has any love for the ship, because it’s stupid and OOC, of course, but mostly because it’s egregiously obviously racist and gross, which is the critique that seems most common, and to be of most importance to people.
And to be clear, for the purposes of this post I am wholly agreeing with all that! It’s distasteful and immoral and people who are into it are insane, including me. I’m not arguing against this line of thinking, I just wanted to look at its inner logic. Because when I first heard people saying this, I thought, “Yeah, makes sense, Charles is truthfully a terrible person with abhorrent opinions. Nobody watching this already unfortunately bigotry-riddled show is obligated to try and look past that! It is Always valid to hate Charles’ guts.”
But it turns out most of the fandom (I assume it must be most, given how shockingly few people here have blocked me) actually don’t hate Charles, in general. It’s the specific ship, not the character, that’s distasteful. (Not to say any Charles ship is anything resembling popular, but like with most ships, that’s just a result of the general population’s Hawkeye BJ Laser Focus Gaze. I’ve never seen anybody actively dislike these ships when they’re brought up.) And the more I think about it, the more I wonder why, because well. to put it bluntly. It’s not like someone stops being racist when they’re not actively interacting with a nonwhite person.
You know what I mean? I feel like Charles’ bigotry would be a turn off for all of our generally morally sound protagonists, not just one who happens to be personally affected by it. But it only becomes an issue when it involves Klinger. I’ve heard people say that any Charles/Klinger ship fic would obviously have to go out of its way to address Charles’ racism, but I’ve read a few Charles/Hawkeye and Charles/Donna (and Charles / other strange and varied choices too, because of course I have) fics–really, REALLY good fics, that captured the characters very nicely and are very beautifully written–and I’ve yet to find one that discusses The Bigotry In The Room with any degree of seriousness.
(Pssst this is everyone’s chance to absolutely dunk on me by sending me fics that do this if there actually are a bunch and I’ve just never read them because I would in fact LOVE to read some fics with that topic regardless of ship!)
And to be clear, that’s fine with me! I truly do not care. When I read Charles running away to Maine or romancing Ms. Parker and I don’t see his love interests stop to ask “Hey, um, so any updates on the fact that you and your whole family are eugenicists?”, it doesn’t bother me in the slightest, because I just assume that Charles has already gone through the cult deprogramming step of his character development at some point prior to this, and either the love interest in question has already confirmed this off-page, or they are making the same assumption I am. After all, at least in Hawkeye’s case, the mere act of admitting romantic interest in a Democrat from the back of beyond would necessarily imply a shift in values, right?
(Admittedly, for all we canonically know Donna could be a fashy scumlord herself, so this reasoning doesn’t wholly apply there, but it obviously does to her fanon background/personality.) (Which is adorable, by the way. Everyone go check out the collective oeuvre of AO3 user onekisstotakewithme.)
So that’s all cool! It’s just that the same thing applies for me when it comes to Charles/Klinger. If anything, it applies even more, because you can have a fic where Charles’ whole family attend his and Donna’s 2nd wedding (Everyone go check out the collective oeuvre of AO3 user onekisstotakewithme!!!) but if Charles gets with Maxwell in any capacity, his father is at the very LEAST never going to speak to him again, ever. And personally I think that is SO fun and sexy, because Charles’ father is a white supremacist and I want him to die painfully forever and ever amen. <3
I got sidetracked a few times here and I just realized I never actually asked the question, which is, TL;DR: If it’s immoral–or at least gross and nonsensical–to ship Charles/Klinger, because Charles is bigoted, shouldn’t the same also apply to shipping Charles with many other characters too, given that they should logically also have a problem with his bigotry?
For what it’s worth, I have a bit of a theory about the answer to this, all to do with the incompetent way Charles’ bigotry (and other characters’ reactions to it) are portrayed in canon and the deeper Doylist factors that I think forced the showrunners into writing it like that, but I wanted to stay strictly on the topic of fandom attitudes for now, because it may be niche and silly, but I find it interesting. And I’d love to hear other people’s thoughts on it!
11 notes
·
View notes