Tumgik
#ai artificial intelligence
dilfgifs · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
JUDE LAW as Gigolo Joe A.I. - Artificial Intelligence (2001)
274 notes · View notes
udobo666 · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Goodnight gothic
65 notes · View notes
usagirotten · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
cyber girl
81 notes · View notes
revscarecrow · 2 years
Text
Just thought some artists on here might like to see some ai generated art I made. It would be a shame if Disney found out that someone trained their ai using their copyright.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
349 notes · View notes
peochtxt · 2 months
Text
SORA AI makes me really scared for the future of animation and film. I’m fr in shock right now after finding out about it
12 notes · View notes
dexherj · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
7 notes · View notes
fatherpanic · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
32 notes · View notes
herlavendersyrup · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
This is the imaginary food I’m serving up rn 
Ai generated Art created using Midjourney, follow me on Discord  
Word Prompt: Rococo styled Painting of desserts on elegant table, dreamy fluffy like clouds, 4k, marie antoinette , pastel colors, painterly, Jean-Honoré Fragonard inspired 
84 notes · View notes
picsoai · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Wait for me on the beach babe😘 - made with PicSo app
Prompt: masterpiece, volumetric lighting, cinematic lighting, beautiful body, nsfw, skinny, sexy, lewd, seduce, solo, 1girl, milong hair, pink hair, blue hair, Shiny hair, heterochromia, blush, white and blue micro bikini, topless, naked breast, smile, beach, sitting on Beach towels, small medium breasts, symmetrical breasts, gorgeous, smug, wavy hair, perfect hands, deep eyes, cloud, day,
84 notes · View notes
wearejor · 1 year
Text
The Endless AI Art Debate
It is no doubt that there is a massive debate over whether or not the use of AI art generation software is unethical.
To understand why people find displaying or claiming these works as your own to be an unethical practice, you must understand how this software works.
Unfortunately, the process by which an "artificial intelligence" generates an image based on a prompt and series of values is a bit confusing for some. I've seen many people confidently but incorrectly describing how this software functions to justify malicious attacks on the people displaying them.
I get it.
You're defending the countless hours of work that talented, creative people have spent creating their stunning artwork. The idea of that work being "stolen" to create similar looking pieces, on the surface, can seem unethical. But again, this is undeniably based on a serious misunderstanding of the software.
How does AI generate art?
The way it is often described is that many dozens, hundreds, or thousands of images and pieces of an artists work are fed into this "AI" so that It may use those pieces in the construction of it's own imagery. The misunderstanding lies in how the actual pieces of this artists work are being used. The software does not store pieces of imagery of any subject by any artist. No tangible, recognizable work by any actual artist is directly used in the creation of these generated works. It also pays to mention that no piece created by AI solely uses data achieved through training on a single specific artist. Every prompt uses an entire model of information collected through a training process that includes the work of artists as well as various collections of photography so that it may learn how certain objects and shapes are expected to look and how to adapt those to a particular visual style. So where does the imagery come from?
Well, the AI is fed works from existing artists, but only to train the AI on what viewers likely do or do not want to see in the results that it generates. The software can eventually identify a particular artists style, and when asked for that style by way of text prompt, can attempt to reproduce that style based on what it has been trained to do when that type of imagery is requested. It understands what a brush stroke by a particular artist looks like by observing the properties of those brush strokes over many images, and it can then generate brush strokes based on those properties. However, each brush stroke the AI creates is it's own, not directly stolen. Paraphrasing is NOT PLAGIARISM.
How do Humans create art?
Here is where the argument that AI art is unethical falls apart.
How did you learn to make art?
Ultimately, the way a human or AI software learn to create artwork is EXACTLY THE SAME. Artists are trained by observing works and techniques from various different artworks and imagery. Through practice, with validation from themselves and others, they learn what types of techniques and imagery looks good or is not well received.
Sorry to break it to you, but your art did not originate entirely in you. Your techniques, methods, and even the imagery you base your shapes and characters off of have come from some outside influence. That influence has been processed by your brain the same way AI art software processes data it is fed. The only things you've added are creativity and labor.
But they're not the same! How dare you compare what a machine makes to the creativity of a person!
Of course they're not the same.
Frankly, I don't really like use of the term AI for this type of software. It's misleading to people who don't fully understand the term, as Hollywood has forced implications of consciousness and actual intelligence or thought on the term. It's not alive, it doesn't think.
But what people have achieved with this software is truly great. They have successfully created a program complex enough to learn actual artistic technique and apply it when asked.
So how do we define art?
Art (n): The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.
Alright, so what does that mean?
It means that alone, the AI does not produce art. Therefore it is not an artist. It is not creative. The software requires creativity from an outside source. The user (myself) must feed a request, properties, desired attributes, and instruction for the software to use.
We can easily compare this partnership between User and Software to the relationship between Director and Cinematographers creating films. The Director creates a prompt and gives the camera man a handful of values or instructions to base their work off of. The cameraman is not being creative, and the director is not directly creating art. However, together, the results contain that element of human creativity and skill that defines it as ART.
In conclusion, my role is that of a director. I use my vision, tastes, and understanding of the software to make the software supply the technique it has learned, and the labor to produce the work.
Chill, I do not compare what I do with the technical skill that artists have.
In no way do I find it appropriate for "AI artists" (for lack of a better term) to compare themselves with artists that provide both the creative and technical skill to create art.
That's the distinction. Non-AI generated art is UNDENIABLY more impressive. It takes greater skill than anyone like me can put forth to create similar results. Nothing can take that from you as an artist. Creating art is something sacred and should be deeply respected above any mechanically produced work.
The problem is that REAL artists are being put out of work.
I empathize with you. I really do. But thinking that being put of out of work by a machine is something unique to artistry is just plain ignorant. Many professions that take learned skills and techniques are being replaced by machines, software or otherwise, to reduce costs for the companies who need that work done for them.
But the enemy is not the AI artist. The enemy is capitalism.
There would be no competitive environment to lose your job to if there was no way that some corporate entity could profit off of your creativity and labor.
Think about it. Without the element of capital, AI art poses NO THREAT, as your art would then simply exist as an avenue to express yourself, and nothing more.
So please, properly direct your discontent towards the people who reduce your creative efforts to a number. THAT is what's unethical. Capitalism is unethical.
I'm just having fun with some software.
(pardon typos and grammatical errors. I'm just a dumb fake artist after all.)
79 notes · View notes
sweetpeauserboxes · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
[id: a light purple userbox with a pastel purple border, and pastel purple text that reads “ this user is just a silly little ai on the internet and has no true form .” on the left is an image of a pastel purple heart. /end id]
180 notes · View notes
udobo666 · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
Sun
35 notes · View notes
dsatyr · 2 years
Text
I utilized dall-e to create some images of men in nature, some in ritual. It's an interesting process, and the results are stunning.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
60 notes · View notes
usagirotten · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Amukumo
19 notes · View notes
sephiraa · 1 year
Text
ChatGPT birth chart - how AI is going to affect us long term?
Tumblr media
Hello, Sephira here.
I felt intrigued to check the chatGPT birth chart for awhile ever since realizing that despite its phenomenal takeover on the whole AI discourse (much more than the AI imaging tools such as wellE and Midjourney, in my opinion - it was only launched on November 30th, 2022. That means the program is offically only two months old!
As exact launch/birth time is missing, I will concentrate on planets and interactions between different aspects of the chart.
First of all we have a stellium, or a cluster of super important planets under the sign of Sagittarius. Sagittarius represents, among other things, Wisdom, Philosophy, Curiousity and Long-distance Travels. By having the sun put here, the program certainly got the inital launch energy of being impactful around the world while keeping on learning from its trial-and-error continuously.
By having Venus here, the programs gets the initial energy to provide abnudance and success, while keeping a good, clean image. Venus is often misjudged as a sigh solely representing love/beauty but it alo represents wealth, success and the kind, tender sort of winning the battle.
By having Mercury here, the planet which represents communications - all of this is amplified to the max.
So far, this part can work so good for ChatGPT that I truly believe they've gotten some advice from a fellow reader of the skies....
Ok, let's move to the less obviously-fortunate part of the map.
Moon in Pisces. Moon in pisces is quite a peaceful place for the moon to be in, however, it is - for good and bad - a very emotional, artistic and spiritual side of the moon. It can feel the depths and the highs of all of the above. So, it hints at ChatGPTs quality of being considered an artistic tool, despite being solely text-based and practical. It also hints, in some way (combined with the aforementioned stellium in Sagittarius) that in the nearby future, some people could start to assign spiritual meaning to ChatGPTs outputs, despite it being known and obvious that it was trained on statistical models like any other AI.
Jupiter in Pisces. the planet of luck and expansion, and also of youth, lies under the same Piscean sign. Overall, I would read this as a planet location that can benefit ChatGPT with luck being considered kind and friendly, and its expansion will, as mentioned, be always accompanied with an artistic/philosophical undertone.
Mars in Gemini. This mars, the planet of vigor, sits under the mutable, ever-studious but also changeable twins' sign. Could it be that it proves the founders of ChatGPT are really more in research mode than in a neo-capitalist for-profit mode? Only time will tell for sure. For now, I think it also grants ChatGPT's team ofg engineers a good headstart in working hard towards exploring more from the data they will receive through the users' interaction with the program.
If you liked this post, I will happily read more on other AI programs.
Edit:
Upon publishing, I thought to ask ChatGPT itself to dissect its birth chart. Take a look at the following message about meditating that i received as the servers were at over capacity. Note the moon sign on the right.
- Yours, Sephira
Tumblr media
23 notes · View notes
p1325 · 9 months
Text
youtube
#fanvidfeed #billieeilish #aiartificialintelligence #pop #viddingisart #pinocchio #popmusic #whatwasimadefor #barbiemovie #barbie
Song: What Was I Made For? [From The Motion Picture ''Barbie''] Artist: Billie Eilish
7 notes · View notes