We Have a Release Date!
Whiskey Jug Genie will be released on November 30, but you can pre-order it right now!
The ebooks will be available at most major book retailers. Paperbacks will be available through Barnes and Noble.
So, if you like a little humor along with your magic, and a hint of romance, check it out!
Whiskey Jug Genie–from Sultonna Nadine!
And remember,
Always Look For the Magic…
View On WordPress
0 notes
all the frothing-at-the-mouth posts about how "don't you dare put a fic writer's work into chatGPT or an artist's work into stable diffusion" are. frustrating
that isn't how big models are made. it takes an absurd amount of compute power and coordination between many GPUs to re-train a model with billions of parameters. they are not dynamically crunching up anything you put into a web interface.
chances are, if you have something published on a fanfic site, or your art is on deviantart or any publicly available repository, it's already in the enormous datasets that they are using to train. and if it isn't in now, it will be in future: the increases in performance from GPT 2 to 3 to 4 were not gained through novel machine-learning architectures or anything but by ramping up the amount of data they used to train by orders of magnitude. if it can be scraped, just assume it will be. you can prevent your stuff from being used with Glaze, if you're an artist, but for the written word there's nothing you can do.
not to be cynical but the genie is already far more out of the bottle than most anti-AI people realize, i think. there is nothing you can do to stop these models from being made and getting more powerful. only the organizing power of labor has a shot at mitigating some of the effects we're all worried about
10K notes
·
View notes
Please don’t use midjourney it steals art from pretty much every artist out there without any compensation. I didn’t know this at first and tried it but then during the creation process i saw water marks and Getty image logos (though I’m sure they’ve hidden that now) so it’s definitely stealing.
No, it isn't. And you've taken the wrong lesson from the Getty watermark issue.
AI training on public facing, published work is fair use. Any published piece could be located, examined, and learned from by a human artist. This does not require the permission of the owner of said work. A mechanical apparatus does not change this principle.
All we, as artists, own, are specific expressions. We do not own styles, ideas, concepts, plots, or tropes. We do not even own the work we create in a proper sense. All our work flows from the commons, and all of it flows back to it. IP is a limited patent on specific expressions, and what constitutes infringement is the end result of the creative process. What goes into it is irrelevant, and upending that process to put inspiration and reference as infringement is the end of art as we know it.
The Getty watermark issue is an example of overfitting, wherein a repetitive element in the dataset over-emphasizes specific features to the point of disrupting the system's attempts at the creation of novel images.
No one denies that the SD dataset is trained on images Getty claims to own, but Getty has so polluted the image search functions of the internet with their watermarked images that the idea of a getty watermark has been picked up the same way the AI might pick up the idea of an eye or a tree branch. It is a systemic failure that Shutterstock and Getty can be so monopolistic and ubiquitous that a dateset trained on literally everything public facing on the internet would be polluted with their watermarks.
Watermarks that, by the way, they add to public domain images, and that google prioritizes over clean versions.
The lawsuits being brought against Midjourney and Stable Diffusion are copyright overreach being presented as a theft tissue. The facts of the matter are not as the litigants state. The images aren't stored, the SD weights are a 4 gig file trained on 250 terabytes, roughly 4 bytes per image. It runs local, does not reach out to image sources over IP. All you've got are mathematical patterns and ratios. I would go so far as to say that the class action suit is based on outright lies.
But for a moment, let's entertain the idea that what goes into a work, as inspiration, can be copyrighted. That styles can be stolen. That what goes in defines infringement, rather than what comes out. What happens then?
Well, the bad news is that if Stable Diffusion and Midjourney were shut down tomorrow, Stable Diffusion is in the wild. It runs local, it's user-trainable. In short, the genie isn't going back in the bottle. Plus, the way diffusion AI works, there's no way to trace a gen to its sources. The weights don't work like that. The indexing would be larger than the entire set of stored patterns.
Well good news, there's an AI for that. The current version is called CLIP Interrogator And it works on everything. Not just AI generated, but any image. It can find what style it closely matches, reverse engineer a prompt. It's crude now, but it will improve.
Now, you've already established that using the same patterns as another work is infringement. You've already established that inspiration is theft. And now there's a robot that tells lawyers who you draw like.
Sure, you can fight it in court. If it goes go to court. But who's to say they won't just staplegun that AI to a monetization re-direction bot like youtube has going with their content ID? Awesome T-shirt design you uploaded to your print-on-demand shop... too bad your art style resembles that from a cartoon from 1973 that Universal got as part of an acquisition and they've claimed all your cash. Sure you can file a DMCA counter-notice, but we all know how that goes.
And then there's this fantasy that upending the system would help artists. But who would "own" that style? Is that piece stealing the style of Stephen Silver, or Disney's Kim Possible(TM)? When you work for Disney their contracts say everything you make is theirs. Every doodle. Every drawing. If the styles are copyrightable, a company could hire an artist straight out of school, publish their work under work-for-hire, fire them, and then go after them for "stealing" the style they developed while working for said corp.
Not to mention that a handful of companies own so much media that it is going to be impossible to find an artist that hasn't been influenced by something under their control.
Oh, and that stock of source images that companies like Disney and Universal have? These kinds of lawsuits won't stop them from building AIs with that material that they "own". The power goes into corp hands, they can down staff to their heart's content and everyone else is denied the ability to compete with them. Worst of all possible worlds.
Be careful what wishes you make when holding the copyright monkey's paw.
4K notes
·
View notes
prompts from Ready, Set, Novel! A Writer's Workbook by Chris Baty, Lindsey Grant, and Tavia Stewart Streit from the National Novel Writing Month
Have each character retell their first memory.
Write your opening scene from the point of view of a supporting character.
Write a scene of dialogue between your main character and a younger version of themself.
Describe the worst thing that ever happened to your villain.
Flash forward twenty years into the future and write a scene that involves at least three of your characters.
Have your characters share tales of their first kisses.
Write about the last five things your main character bought and why they bought them.
Write a scene in which your protagonist and villain get drunk together.
Lock a few of your characters in a broken elevator.
People rarely get sick in novels. Have your protagonist come down with something.
Write a thank-you card from your protagonist to their sidekick.
Relate the dream your villain had last night.
Your protagonist's mother is interviewed for the local newspaper about her child's achievements. Write that article.
Add a scene in which your character loses something very valuable.
Write a week's worth of Facebook posts from a supporting character. Take it a step further and add comments made by their friends... and enemies.
Have your villain bust out their high school yearbook. Write some of the notes they find in it.
Have your character recount a (hilarious) childhood trauma.
Write a scene describing how your main character's parents met.
Does your main character collect anything? Maybe they should. Describe their collection and why they started it.
Write a really cheesy love song that your main character will sing to their love interest.
Describe the worst thing your main character ever did.
Write a scene in which your main character and the villain have to work together, and explain why.
Send your protagonist to a psychic. What do they find out?
Write a description of your setting in the style of a travel brochure.
Deprive a character of sleep for three days and write about how it affects them.
Read "Today's Featured Article" on Wikipedia and integrate something you learn into your novel.
Your main character finds a genie in a bottle. What three wishes do they make?
Place a few characters in a karaoke bar. Describe the scene and what songs they choose to sing.
Have a character win a huge prize out of the blue. How do they react when they get the news?
Your villain houses a dinner party. What's on the menu? Who is invited?
Write a 200-word newspaper obituary for your villain.
338 notes
·
View notes