I doodled Maximum Ride abt a month ago and totally forgot to post it. I tried to draw her EXACTLY as I imagined her when I read the books in 2008
312 notes
·
View notes
this singular page disconnects me from every ounce of sanity i possess in my body
214 notes
·
View notes
Currently thinking abt Kell lifting an eyebrow, raising his chin, imitating Alucard and going “Excuse me, I’m a privateer.”
47 notes
·
View notes
Awwwe Luke gave Percy a gift to help him on his quest 🎁 that's so...sweet of him. So gentlemanly. 🥰☺ He's so...Kind isn't he?
34 notes
·
View notes
listening to a darker shade of magic on audiobook in preparation for fragile threads of power, and maybe i'm putting too much thought into this, but i wonder why adoption and meritocracy-based governments aren't more normalized in red london? kell is adopted, obviously, but his feelings about this and the general circumstances with the whole amnesia spell imply it's somewhat unusual. however, the book also states that everyone in red london knows that magical talent isn't inherited through bloodlines, but is actually pretty much random. so in that case, you'd think they would develop a society that was less about bloodlines and inheritance and more of a meritocracy, but they still have a monarchy and noble classes. (white london on the other hand is a weird combination of monarchy/survival of the fittest, but i really wouldn't count that as a good society structure). plus, there's a lot of emphasis in the red london chapters that rhy is old enough to get married and father and] heir but like…why does he need to have a biological kid to inherit after him? it's not like the maresh family has some particular magic talent that needs to get passed down to their children, and rhy himself is a clear example that being royalty doesn't mean you have strong magic. maybe it's because i've studied other societies like the roman empire where it was totally normal to adopt your heirs, but it feels like a bit of a missed opportunity not to explore how randomized magical talent in red london affects their society.
22 notes
·
View notes
Hello lads, I'm back on my bullshit because of another fiction man. Kell Maresh, you deserve the world.
16 notes
·
View notes
so i’ve read yellowface and babel now and realized rf kuang isn’t for me even if i would’ve loved the opposite to be true. i love the high concepts of her stories but on a stylistic level, they’re very tell not show, especially babel. i’d hoped that quality was in yellowface due to it being a novella, but it’s kind of sad something as expansive like babel had that quality as well. i’ve seen people describe her writing as if she doesn’t trust her readers to connect the dots, and i agree with that. for example, when talking about a word that could be read as a homonym in chinese and english, the impact of that realization felt spoilt when she explained the pun to the reader in the same page.
her works are also definitely targeted for another demographic of reader and that’s alright. to me, they’re a racism 101 for white readers or readers with a background within the hegemony or for readers who grew up where being (east) asian is a minority. it’s also how i felt about kim ji-young: i recognize the importance of the book’s existence, but i accept that it wasn’t made for me.
yan lang
37 notes
·
View notes
I’m not a fan of training montages.
Especially in books.
But goddamn when it’s a training montage of progressively brutal fights between your otp I am HERE for it.
32 notes
·
View notes
Happy 10th birthday to Vicious by V.E. Schwab!!
If you have not read it... now would be a great time ;)
26 notes
·
View notes