Tumgik
#kathleen stock
bitterkarella · 2 months
Text
Midnight Pals: Shedding
[mysterious circle of robed figures] JK Rowling: hello children Rowling: i have terrible, bone-chilling newsss Rowling: did you know that india willoughby exisssstsss? Rowling: thiss makess me ssso mad
Rowling: i know you're all ussed to me being ssubtle Rowling: you know, talking about womensss ssafety and all that Rowling: but i'm done with that Rowling: now i enter endgame
Rowling: tonight my rage ssshall fuel my final transssformation Rowling: tonight i sshed my ssskin for the lassst time Rowling: gone will be the resspectable normie lib ssspotted patterning Rowling: henceforth i shall wear banded patterning [puts on arm band]
Rowling: now i sshed my ssskin and obsserve my transformation to full blood purity fascism Helen Joyce: but dark lord! it's too obvious! Joyce: what if the rubes notice? Rowling: just point to that old "wear whatever you want" post and pretend i meant it
Rowling: i'll be right back, gonna go shed a sskin Rowling: now before i leave one lasst directive Rowling: you lot don't do anything ssilly while i'm gone Rowling: you know, anything that would make our entire causse look dumb or anything Joyce: you can count on us, dark lord!
[Rowling exits] Joyce: so Joyce: anyone wanna hear this new fan fic i've been working on Jesse Singal: when does mommy get back
Joyce: so Joyce: so my story has draco/hermione otp, noncon, dubcon, cuckolding, underage, lemon, coffeeshop au, crackfic Kathleen Stock: noooo helen! don't read fanfic! don't you know fanfic turns you trans? Joyce: sorry its a risk i have to take Joyce: for science
Joyce: look, i'm going to scientifically prove that fanfiction turns you trans Joyce: luckily i'm built of stronger stuff Joyce: the rest of you just plug your ears Stock: what about you, helen? Joyce: lash me to the mast
Stock: i've been writing a fan fic too Stock: it's about the love between the Unknown, an evil choclatier who lives in the walls, and this mysteriously sexy lady oompa loompa who everybody loves who is named Stathleen Kock [permaberry, leaking juice, enjoyment, enemies to lovers]
Rowling: ok i'm back Helen Joyce: dark lord! how does it feel to shed your lib skin of plausible deniability to don your extremely online skin of blood purity? Rowling: i feel sstrong! powerful! like a new ssnake! Rowling: i feel like i can sssay Rowling: ALL THE SSSLURSS!!!
Rowling: tinktonk! cricklecrack! boofnoggin! i can sssay them all!!! Rowling: no now mudblood can ssstand in my way! Rowling: doess india willoughby still exissst? Joyce: yes dark lord! Rowling: [coiling in rage] the cheek!!!! the audacity!!!
Rowling: ugh, look at india willoughby, performing feminine joy! Rowling: womanhood isn't about joy! Rowling: true femininity is being miserable all the time, posting and also being banned from seeing your grandchildren
1K notes · View notes
a-room-of-my-own · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Today in Men in Dresses trying to redefine the word woman. Look at these laydees explaining to us silly girls that if we have short hair and wear pants we're probably men inside
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
649 notes · View notes
libracorpvs · 1 year
Text
The Lesbian Project (for actual lesbians) is holding its first ever meeting today in London - so of course 100+ trans activists have turned up to protest that men are not being included
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
977 notes · View notes
uter-us · 7 months
Text
youtube
at the end, when people came up to ask questions, a woman came up and admitted she hadnt read her book and wasnt sure what kathleen stock was gonna say, but ended up "shocked" by how "reasonable and sensible" her arguments were because of the protests that day about stock made her seem like a "fanatic" and a "trans hating boogeyman" (the woman asking the question said that part lightheartedly). and she goes on to ask basically why she thinks that is, but I rlly think even just that question spoke volumes to how gender critical feminists are portrayed. like it really reinforces the whole like "if we aren't capable of making a difference, then they wouldn't need so much propaganda"
another notable part is when she asks the interviewer what gender is (like what definition he's working w) and he literally stutters and hadnt brought a definition w him yk? like it was so awkward to watch and I felt kind of bad for him but also it's the sad reality of his side yk?
a favorite line was "nobody seems to care about the women... and that's what I care about."
95 notes · View notes
there-are-4-lights · 2 months
Text
37 notes · View notes
quinnfabrayapologist · 10 months
Text
Kathleen Stock, known TERF, just published a 'thinkpiece' that was somehow devoid of all critical thought, in which she explained her stance on abortion, and how if someone is pregnant, the people close to them - meaning their partner, parents, siblings, and existing children - are all invested in the outcome of the pregnancy, and therefore should get equal say to the person who is actually pregnant in matters of abortion.
Can we PLEASE stop calling transphobes 'feminists'? Because like... where is the feminism happening here?
Tumblr media
49 notes · View notes
blackswaneuroparedux · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media
Quid ergo dicemus, cum et silentii et orationis magna utilitas sit? *
- Sallust
What then should we say, considering that there is great utility in both silence and in speaking? *
Prof Kathleen Stock, a university professor of philosophy was hounded out of her post by trans activists for her gender critical views. In her work she tackled the relation between sex and gender identity, arguing among other things that: womanhood and manhood reflect biological sex, not gender or gender identity; the claim “transwomen are women” is a fiction, not literally true; sexual orientation (being gay, being lesbian) is determined by same-sex attraction, not attraction to gender identity; spaces where women undress and sleep should remain genuinely single-sex, in order to protect them; and children with gender identity disorders should not be given puberty blockers as minors. For holding such views she was subject to torrential abuse and subsequently hounded out of her academic position by a vocal minority of student trans right activists for holding such ‘transphobic’ views.
Stock was invited first by the Cambridge Union and later the Oxford Union to debate her views. At Oxford, trans activists tried to get her invitation rescinded on the basis that her views constituted ‘hate speech’. The Oxford Union was threatened by the Student Union to deny her a platform. To their credit, the Oxford Union held fast to their free speech principles while a petition signed by many Oxford academics, including Richard Dawkins and Nigel Biggar, came out in support for Prof. Stock.
Trans activists did their best to disrupt the event outside with a march while also offering ‘safe spaces’ for triggered Oxford students in a nearby college room complete with energy bars, ear plugs, and bottled water.
Inside the chamber, one activist, Riz Possnett, glued her hand to the chamber floor, in an attempt to disrupt Stock’s talk, until she was removed by police. The privately educated Possnett (£41,000 year private school in Hong Kong) reading PPE at Wadham College, Oxford, is no stranger to controversy as ‘they’ was known to be an Extension Rebellion activist and Republican agitator, having previously broken into Windsor Castle to frolic on King Charles’ bed with ‘their’ partner.
Prof Stock told the Union that some universities were “becoming propaganda machines for a particular point of view”. She said she did not find it “traumatic” to have protesters outside the event and said that students in her generation staged similar protests. “Generally what I find more worrying is when institutions listen to protesters and take that voice through into the institution and basically become propaganda machines for a particular point of view and then everyone else in that institution feels that they can’t say what they want to say,” she said. She said that had happened in some universities. She told the Union said it would “take courage” for people to realise that “the world does not end” when you have disagreements.
Photo: Prof Stock brought the severed head of a trans activist to display in an attempt to trigger her critics. Is there no end to this woman's evil?
37 notes · View notes
nomorerww · 17 days
Text
https://x.com/Docstockk/status/1778358533051805730
Tumblr media
if they cared that they were in the wrong they woudn't be spouting the same stale bull for years on end
6 notes · View notes
gendiebrainrotreceipts · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
26 notes · View notes
bitterkarella · 10 months
Text
Midnight Pals: Raw Deal
[mysterious circle of robed figures] JK Rowling: hello children Rowling: i've just learned ssssome disssturbing newsss Rowling: from a reputable sssource Rowling: a random nazi on twitter Rowling: but Rowling: i really really REALLY want it to be true
Rowling: did you know Rowling: that puberty blockers deaden a childsss sssoul? Rowling: a transss child is literally an inhuman shell Kathleen Stock: wow! like a monster! Rowling: yesss Rowling: exactly like a monster Rowling: think about it
Rowling: what i'm sssaying is that trans kids are bassically monsssterss Stock: what about those trans kids who keep saying that gender affirming care is life saving? Rowling: well Rowling: a monssster would lie wouldn't it?
Rowling: now then we all know what to do about monssstersss don't we Stock: yeah! kill them! Rowling: i meant deny them the ussse of magical wandsss as per Claussse Three of the Code of Wand Ussssse Rowling: but alssso yess kill them
Rowling: friendss the time hasss come Rowling: we mussst kill thessse children in order to sssave them Rowling: sssave them from the living death that is ssself-determination!
[meanwhile] Dan Simmons: so i heard some wokies thought frankenstein got a raw deal Mary Shelley: Simmons: like haha! Stupid commies, having sympathy for a monster! Simmons: i mean, he's literally a monster! Shelley: does no one here know how to read
Mary Shelley: the whole point of the fuckin book was that frankenstein got a raw deal Simmons: sounds like cultural marxism to me Shelley: [stabbing Simmons] does anyone ELSE here not know how to read? Rowling: [unfurling from bushes] me, i don't
617 notes · View notes
andythecorsair · 3 months
Text
What's the last book that you read that challenged your beliefs or politics?
I'll go first. I just finished "Material Girls" by Kathleen Stock which made me reevaluate the approaches of modern feminist, LGBTQIA, and TRA discourse and activism.
5 notes · View notes
libracorpvs · 11 months
Text
kathleen stock liked my reply on twitter, crops watered cancer cured acne cleared etc etc
36 notes · View notes
the-land-of-women · 27 days
Text
5 notes · View notes
in-sufficientdata · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
That entire illustration is sending me help
Like I immediately see parallels to my experience in high school because my freshman English teacher allowed us to sit wherever we wanted
I took to sitting cross-legged on the top of my desk
At some point, after like 2 entire months of this, someone higher up (the principal or superintendent, I suppose) saw me sitting there and told the teacher that he had to make me start sitting in my chair
Anyways that teacher is now a friend of mine on facebook and I now know he has pretty leftist politics, including being accepting of LGBTQ identities
Isn't it funny that a leftist teacher understand that tables can be chairs if the student needs them to be!
6 notes · View notes
homosexuhauls · 11 months
Text
FSU Arts Forum: Dr Kathleen Stock in conversation with choreographer Rosie Kay
youtube
Since the summer of 2022, the Free Speech Union has been hosting Arts Forums for individuals who work in the arts, the purpose of which is to provide a space for open discussion about freedom of expression issues affecting the sector.
On 23rd May 2023, our London Arts Forum met to consider the importance of the freedom to imagine. Our special guest speaker was Professor Kathleen Stock, who joined the award-winning choreographer Rosie Kay (currently touring her new show, 5 Soldiers) on-stage to discuss contemporary threats to freedom of expression, creativity and imagination in the arts.
Although now well-known for her public engagement with debates pertaining to gender identity, Dr Stock forged her academic career through work on aesthetics and the artistic imagination in literature, music and the visual arts. As well as publishing numerous articles and chapters, she is the author of the book Only Imagine: Fiction, interpretation, and imagination (Oxford University Press, 2017).
8 notes · View notes
there-are-4-lights · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
15 notes · View notes