Tumgik
#new constitution
So... Chile is going out to vote again now in relation to the draft that has been made on the new Constitution of the country. And this time I am not sure if the vote in favor will help the proposals that interest me remain intact or if the rejection will change everything. The problem is that the draft is unclear on certain aspects so the balance is very divided and difficult to decide. But, if the proposals that are not clear have to be changed, they should be changed and clarified and do the job well this time and not transform it into another circus because of that, they are experts. 🤦🏾‍♀️😑
3 notes · View notes
vyorei · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
FUCK YES THAT'S THE STUFF
26K notes · View notes
rabbitcruiser · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Irish Free State was replaced by a new state called Ireland with the adoption of a new constitution on December 29, 1937.
0 notes
kaydub80 · 7 months
Text
Chile's new constitution process hijacked by the far right
youtube
5:45 sounds familiar -- namely, the protests against militarized police three years ago in this country resulting in even more militarized police and Cop City being built
0 notes
destielmemenews · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
source
6K notes · View notes
youtube
Lewiston Stanley Martin Homes | Avalon Park | Tavares Real Estate | New ...
0 notes
Video
Vivi l'essenza di Venezia La prossima destinazione della vita mediterranea a Dubai Prossimamente Per info e contatti @meii-servizi-immobiliari
1 note · View note
whatbigotspost · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Y’all, in the spirit of celebrating victories, this one’s worth highlighting.
Over and over, EVEN IN RED STATES, abortion rights are being validated by the voting block. Even when Republicans try shitty partially covert preemptive attacks like this.
It’s a remarkable sign of hope that maybe we’ll get this basic human right guaranteed again so people can stop suffering and dying.
778 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
3K notes · View notes
whaliiwatching · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
get remixed, bitches
384 notes · View notes
alphamecha-mkii · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
204 notes · View notes
reasonsforhope · 9 months
Link
Article Date: 7 June 2023
Climate litigation in the US could be entering a “game changing” new phase, experts believe, with a spate of lawsuits around the country set to advance after a recent supreme court decision, and with legal teams preparing for a trailblazing trial in a youth-led court case beginning next week.
The first constitutional climate lawsuit in the US goes to trial on Monday next week (12 June) in Helena, Montana, based on a legal challenge by 16 young plaintiffs, ranging in age from five to 22, against the state’s pro-fossil fuel policies.
A federal judge ruled last week that a federal constitutional climate lawsuit, also brought by youth, can go to trial.
More than two dozen US cities and states are suing big oil alleging the fossil fuel industry knew for decades about the dangers of burning coal, oil and gas, and actively hid that information from consumers and investors.
The supreme court cleared the way for these cases to advance with rulings in April and May that denied oil companies’ bids to move the venue of such lawsuits from state courts to federal courts.
Hoboken, New Jersey, last month added racketeering charges against oil majors to its 2020 climate lawsuit, becoming the first case to employ the approach in a state court and following a federal lawsuit filed by Puerto Rico last November.
the new forms of climate litigation are different, as they grapple not with particular projects’ emissions, but on responsibility for the climate crisis itself. Sokol, who dubbed these new suits “climate accountability litigation”, says though they will not alone lower emissions, they could help reshape climate plans.
In the US, this litigation has taken a variety of forms; perhaps the best known cases are based on constitutional rights and brought by youth.
One of those cases, Held v Montana, is based on the state’s constitutional guarantees to a clean and healthy environment, which were enshrined in the 1970s and which the plaintiffs say the state has violated by supporting fossil fuels. It will next week become the first-ever constitutional climate lawsuit to go to trial in the US.
Held v Montana followed the highly publicized 2015 Juliana v United States in which 21 young people from Oregon sued the US government for violating their constitutional rights to life, liberty and property by enacting policies that drove and exacerbated the climate crisis. The case, which like the Montana suit was filed by the non-profit law firm Our Children’s Trust, calls on federal officials to phase out fossil fuels.
Last week, a US district court ruled in favor of the youth plaintiffs, allowing that their claims can be decided at trial in open court.
Litigation based on state constitutional rights, also filed by Our Children’s Trust, is currently pending in four other states. One of those cases brought by Hawaii youth is set to go to trial, possibly as soon as this fall.
Another set of lawsuits in the US allege that the fossil fuel industry has for decades known about the dangers of burning coal, oil and gas, and actively hid that information from consumers and investors. Since 2017, seven states, 35 municipalities, the District of Columbia, and one industry trade association have sued major fossil fuel corporations and lobbying groups on these grounds.
In late April, lawyers for the city of Hoboken amended a 2020 complaint to allege that the defendants violated New Jersey’s racketeering laws by conspiring to sow doubt about climate change.
It marked the first-ever state-level lawsuit of its kind, following one last year in which 16 Puerto Rico cities brought federal racketeering charges, originally used to bring down criminal enterprises like the mafia, against big oil.
Unlike some previous cases, Hoboken’s amended lawsuit focuses not only on past misinformation, but also on contemporary greenwashing – something that could feature prominently in future cases.
A study last month examined litigation against fossil fuel majors and found that the filing of a new case or a court decision against a corporation took a slight toll on their finances. Novel developments – including a groundbreaking 2021 Netherlands court ruling ordering Shell to substantially slash its carbon emissions, and an unprecedented transnational claim filed in 2012 by a Peruvian farmer against a German energy company – yielded bigger blows.
Sankar, of Earthjustice, said he expects to see new forms of climate litigation in future years. “As the impact on states and localities increases, they are increasingly going to be looking for ways in which their state and local laws protect them,” he said.
(shinigami red links in this post go to The Guardian)
Article Date: 7 June 2023
Article Source: Dharna Noor for The Guardian
--
Thanks so much to @queerce for submitting!
263 notes · View notes
rabbitcruiser · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Irish Free State was replaced by a new state called Ireland with the adoption of a new constitution on December 29, 1937.
1 note · View note
kaydub80 · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
A Sixth Amendment violation in plain sight. What's the point of having the Bill of Rights when authorities are going to ignore it anyway?
1 note · View note
chernobog13 · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds
281 notes · View notes
ascender56 · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Some more of my reimagined TOS Enterprise
261 notes · View notes