Trauma-Punk (Coining)
Concept
An aesthetic and social group/movement focused on trauma survivors of any and all kinds. You have gone through hell and back and you are allowed to be loud, angry, aggressive, and selfish. Traumapunk is for all the unsavory survivors who don’t fall into society's ideal victim mold. It’s taking back the power from times you could not before, it’s being independent and self assured, it’s saying fuck you to the system that allowed your traumas to occur, saying fuck you to the abusers you may have had. You don’t have to be quiet or docile, you can be loud and aggressive.
All trauma survivors matter, and the discrimination and biases we face on a daily basis should no longer go ignored. This is a movement for all the cluster-b disordered people, all the people with PTSD, all the people with DID/OSDD, and any other trauma induced disorders. Everyone with the “wrong” reaction to their trauma and everyone who has decided they will no longer take anyone's shit.
All trauma survivors can be a part of this, regardless of disorders or the lack thereof. Your trauma no matter how big, no matter how small, is valid.
Trauma Punk Flag
[Image ID: The trauma-punk flag, consistent of 7 stripes which are reflected horizontally. The stripes go as follows; Dark Sienna, Rosso Corsa, Old Brick, Carousel Pink, Old Brick, Rosso Corsa, and then Dark Sienna. The flag is all tinted towards a redish color. End ID]
The flags colors all have their own meaning
Dark Sienna: All the negative feelings and emotions that comes from having experienced trauma, the feeling of being alone.
Rosso Corsa: Anger towards what happened, having to fight to survive. Not being docile.
Old Brick: Any and all people with socially unacceptable reactions to their traumas- including disorders, temperament shifts, and being untrusting of others. (Separate from anger).
Carousel Pink: Recovery and healing
This flag is free to be used and never requires any credit.
Core Beliefs
Pro/Supports
People with Personality Disorders
People with PTSD/cPTSD
Traumagenic Systems (DID/OSDD)
CDDs (Complex Dissociative Disorders)
People with lesser known disorders like RAD, ASD (acute stress disorder not autism), DSED
People with trauma based adjustment disorders
People with trauma based anxiety disorders
People with “problematic” (trauma induced) OCD themes
Anyone with trauma
Low empathy
Hyper empathy
Well researched self-dx
Sex-workers
Hypersexual survivors
Sex repulsed survivors
Trans People
Gay People
Intersex people
Xenogenders
Self-defense
Angry Survivors
Survivors who want revenge
Survivors who want to see their perps be better people
Anti-Psych/Psych-Critical
Psychology/psychiatry should be available for those in need- however there are massive issues within the field and it needs to be addressed. We personally prefer Psych-Crit, but people recognize Anti-psych more.
Anti/Against
Ableists
“Narcissistic/Histrionic/Borderline/Sociopathic” Abuse
The abuser made their choice, having a disorder will never make someone be an abuser, that abusive person CHOSE to be evil. Your anger should be at them, not fellow trauma survivors.
Trauma Comparison
All traumas are valid, some may be harder to deal with than others but we are still all survivors.
Sanists
Fakeclaimers
You never know what someone is going through it is not your place to decide if they have a disorder or not
Terfs/Swerfs/Radfems
Transphobes
Homophobes
Transmeds
Intersexists
1K notes
·
View notes
Kills two birds with one stone: makes you look like you know more than you really do, AND it makes your ex jealous!
Jokes aside, this is actually gonna be a plot point in the Simon story; Bill saying he’s Simon’s other parent. It’s a plausible explanation, plus it drives a further wedge of general mistrust between the Stan twins, since Ford now highly doubts Stan’s own recollections of Simon’s conception, while Stan continues to become increasingly frustrated with Fords shenanigans. Not to mention Ford wondering what purpose a human offspring might serve to Bill’s plans.
Of course, every explanation for Simon that Bill provides is a lie, because Bill doesn’t know why Simon’s Like That either, and is talking out of his own ass
67 notes
·
View notes
Sex-repulsed allosexual
PT/ Sex-repulsed allosexual /PT end
ID/ A flag with four equal stripes. Colors top to bottom are darker purple, red, off-white, and dull green. There is a black negative sign in a circle on the far left side. /ID end
--
-> requested by anon
ID/ A white DNI with a panel of the manga Oyasumi Punpun with 5 kids doing a joint pose. Words are black on the right side: “DNI: anti- ‘contradictory’ labels, anti-mogai, terf, gatekeeper, anti-decolonization, believes ‘narc abuze’ is real, demonizes ‘scary/evil’ disorders + labels.” /ID End
22 notes
·
View notes
Repulhypersexy
[PT: Repulhypersexy /END PT]
An asexual label for asexuals that are hypersexual and repulsed(apothisexual) at the same time, it can be difficult to understand your sexuality for that reason. The person might have sexual attraction only to kinks, and repulsed for everything else, can feel disgust and strong attraction at the same time, etc.
This label is for every repulsed hypersexual, not only by trauma but due bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia etc.
106 notes
·
View notes
Repulsaegosexual
[Plain text: Repulsaegosexual]
Definition: a sexual orientation on the asexual spectrum in which someone experiences a disconnect between themselves, and the subject of arousal, they may experience sexual fantasies, enjoy sexual media, other sexual content, and possibly imagine sexual encounters in the third person, but do not feel sexual attraction, nor do they engage in any sexual encounter with themself or anyone else, as they are repulsed by the idea of doing so.
Intended for: no one
Exclusive to: no one
Requested by: a friend
Inspired by: no one
Flag/s:
52 notes
·
View notes
pellic
A term for someone who prefers non-sexual kink acts to sex.
This can include asexual(-spectrum) people who are interested in kink but not sex, but it is also inclusive of allosexuals who prefer non-sexual kink to sex for any reason.
The term is derived from Latin "pellis", which translates both to "skin" (which is touched during many physical acts of kink) and "leather" (an item featured in many kinks and sometimes considered emblematic of kink as a whole).
This can be combined with another orientation (e.g. pellic lesbian, bipellic, etc.), or it can be used as a label on its own if one views one's interest in non-sexual kink as an orientation in and of itself.
[This post has no DNI other than not to use it if you're a minor and not to involve it in discourse, mockery, or other harassment]
10 notes
·
View notes
@climatact asked:
"Aw, did you just become a Straw Hat for me?" Tee hee.
❝ What? No... ❞ Where did she even...
Words trail off as the surgeon turns the events of the last few chaotic and frankly traumatizing hours over in his mind, trying to pinpoint a moment amid the pandemonium that would have left her with an idea like that. Perhaps the whole affair had been even more damaging for her than he'd realized.
(On the other one, perhaps he's the one who's snapped. He's completely blocking out whatever she's referring to - because of course he didn't just become a Straw Hat, Nami. That would be absolutely preposterous.)
❝ No idea what you're talking about. Maybe you should go lay down for a while. It's been a really fucked up day. ❞
He's just gonna... stay awake and contemplate his life decisions. Possibly from several yards rooms away. And no. He is never going to acknowledge it.
10 notes
·
View notes
“Stone bottoms using the “excuse” of trauma doesn’t make sense, if they truly had trauma they wouldn’t want to be touched”
Some of us were forced to perform sexual acts on others Susan.
Some of us were forced to become the sexual object for our rapists own means to and end. And if we didn’t live up to the expectations we never consented to in the first place, they abused us more and made sure to treat us like shit.
Stone bottoms not wanting to perform sexual acts because of trauma actually makes perfect fucking sense if you can think about it for a second, especially when the 50/50 assholes come out of the woodwork to demand that we cater to them by allowing our boundaries to be violated(kinda like how our rapists did). Maybe we don’t want our partners demanding that we perform in the “giving” role again because it was thrust upon us before without our consent. Maybe we don’t want to be bossed around by someone who thinks their entitled to our bodies.
Seriously, It’s disturbing watching the 50/50 assholes in the sapphic community continuously justifying their entitlement to sex with “you owe your partner sex if they’re getting you off”
Sorry… I thought we all agreed the notion of OWING PEOPLE SEX IS RAPIST BEHAVIOR.
Like it’s wild that y’all insist that the incel way of thinking is valid when it comes to stone bottoms, and that you treat sex as a transaction. Makes me want to vom quite frankly.
I’m saying this as a stone bottom lesbian as well. It’s fucking sad but it had to be said. I’m tired of the bullshit.
7 notes
·
View notes