Tumgik
#Richard dangerous
deaditeye · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
MY DANGEROUS BROTHERS OC
And also my friends ocs too + the dangerous brothers
Me n my friends had made dangerous brothers ocs and we made em all know each other n live together n all that bollocks, we called em the dangerous siblings.
You can see all the dangerous siblings in the purple one (7th one)
4 notes · View notes
neil-neil-orange-peel · 8 months
Note
You know I’m going to ask for Richard Dangerous for the character bingo.
But of course! We must have some certainties in this world!
Richard Dangerous
Tumblr media
My logic is that he does not need me to take a bullet for him, because he's basically a looney tune. Since there are so many Riks, I am being very strict with myself and trying to differentiate my responses to them all, rather than just going YEP YEP YEP to all of them. 😂
That said, would still totally adopt him (and Sir Adrian) because I just think it would be funny.
3 notes · View notes
wat-the-cur · 2 years
Note
Why is Richard Dangerous a fave character for you over other Rik characters out of curiousity? I find him really endearing, he's so scrappy and mean but also very vulnerable, totally the manky flea ridden mutt at the dog shelter, Sir Adrian's more a big happy dumb labrador
Oof, that’s a bit tricky to answer, honestly. Sometimes I’m not quite sure why I gravitate towards certain characters, and for some reason I really love Richard Dangerous.
I think a lot of it probably has to do with what you were saying, about him being mean and vicious, but also vulnerable. That aspect of him leaves a lot of room for headcanons, and I have a few for him. I like as well that, compared to Rick, or Richie, Richard Dangerous is more tough and masculine, but he still has a big interest in feminine things, and he’s still just as weasely and pathetic (femininity and pathetic ness being separate things, or course). It’s the contrast I like. If you consider as well, that he could also be one of the escorts, from Mr. Jolly Lives Next Door, that makes him two of my favourites in one!
Also, it might just be my stubborn desire to elevate more obscure and underrated characters, especially if they are a bit bizarre. And Richard Dangerous is all three of those things. The Dangerous Brothers are quite underrated in my opinion, especially in terms of dynamic. They are a lot more in tune with each other than some of the more iconic Rik n Ade duos.
4 notes · View notes
lovelyinspiration1463 · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
I'm somewhere between "How long do you have?" and "I don't know! Please, send help."
472 notes · View notes
andy-clutterbuck · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Happy Valentine's Day
570 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
65 notes · View notes
squash1 · 1 year
Text
something about THE NIGHT HORRORS ALWAYS ONLY WANTED TO KILL RONAN BUT THEN WHEN HE DECIDED HE DIDN’T HATE HIMSELF THE GIANT NIGHT HORROR ONLY WANTED TO PROTECT HIS FRIENDS BECAUSE THATS WHAT RONAN WANTED. REALLY THATS ALL HE EVER WANTS.
369 notes · View notes
leon-swedfinqs · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
i would like people's suggestions on who to add or if any of the characters need to be moved
no i am not ok why are you asking me
124 notes · View notes
Link
Another dangerous ruling by Samuel Alito
The far right justices on the Supreme Court are out of control and appear to be totally lacking concern for the health and wellbeing of their fellow Americans. Samuel Alito decided to trash the meaning of the Clean Water Act by defining “water” in a ridiculously limited way. Now he has opened the floodgates again to massive pollution of our waterways via wetlands. 
Justice Antonin Scalia died more than seven years ago, but the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday shows that this is the “Scalia Court” far more so than when he was alive. [...] The precise legal issue decided in Sackett concerns the geographic scope of the 1972 Clean Water Act. Congress intended the law to end the practice of the nation’s waterways being used as the unregulated dumping ground for industrial pollution. The effect was transformational: For the first time in the nation’s history, any discharge of pollutants into the nation’s waterways absent a permit was unlawful, making it possible to safely fish and swim waters throughout the country.
Congress was not at all shy about the geographic reach of the Clean Water Act. The statute targeted discharges into “navigable waters,” but Congress also expressly defined that to include all “waters of the United States.” Since the mid-1970s, the courts have uniformly agreed that Congress intended with that expansive definition to extend the law’s protections far beyond traditional navigable waters to include the wetlands, intermittent streams and other tributaries that feed into the nation’s major rivers and lakes.
In a unanimous opinion for the court almost 40 years ago, Justice Byron White explained why. While acknowledging that “on a purely linguistic level, it may appear unreasonable to classify ‘lands’ wet or otherwise as ‘waters,’” the court said “such a simplistic response … does justice neither to the problem faced by the [government] nor to the realities of the problem of water pollution that the Clean Water Act was intended to combat.”
Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s opinion in Sackett, however, embraces the very “simplistic response” that the court rightly criticized in 1985. Relying on a dictionary definition of “waters” and ignoring the Clean Water Act’s purpose, the court’s conservative majority has adopted a radically truncated view of the reach of the law’s restriction on water pollution. Under the court’s new view, pollution requires a permit only if it is discharged into waters that are “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water, ‘forming geographic[al] features’ that are described in ordinary parlance as ‘streams … oceans, rivers, and lakes.’” And “wetlands” are covered only if they are “indistinguishably part” of those narrowly defined covered waters. [...] The impact of the majority ruling is potentially enormous. It could lead to the removal of millions of miles of streams and millions of acres of wetlands from the law’s direct protection. Basic protections necessary to ensure clean, healthy water for human consumption and enjoyment will be lost. As highlighted by Justice Elena Kagan’s separate opinion, the court’s opinion “prevents the EPA from keeping our country’s waters clean by regulating adjacent wetlands.”
Nor will the nation’s economy be spared. Myriad businesses rely on clean water for their industrial processes. The fishing, real estate and tourism industries are all highly dependent on the protections that the Clean Water Act has provided over the past half-century.
None of this was compelled by law. Even Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh rejected Alito’s majority view, announcing that he “would stick to the text.” Congress spoke clearly in the Clean Water Act about its ambitions and backed that intent up with deliberately sweeping language to provide the EPA with the discretionary authority it needed to realize those goals. Our nation’s waters are far cleaner as a result. Yet, for the second time in less than a year, an activist Supreme Court has deployed the false label of “separation of powers” to deny the other two branches the legal tools they require to safeguard the public.
[emphasis added]
251 notes · View notes
get-back-homeward · 1 year
Text
Ringo's Love of Jive Dancing
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Playing skiffle with Eddie Clayton introduced a welcome way out from the street-corner existence Richy Starkey had known more than a year. It would take a long time to remove himself completely, but being with a group was an alternative to “walking” with the gang, and when he and Roy weren’t doing one or the other they were often dancing. Both were athletic and acrobatic jivers, accomplished rock and roll dancers able to flip, flop and fly their female partners, hold them up in the air and send them scooting through their legs.
Richy was a good jiver and so was I. We used to go to all the hops, to the Rialto and the Cavern, and girls liked to dance with us because we could do it. We had denim suits and denim jackets so the lads and girls in the Cavern called us “the Binmen.” We had regular jiving partners and loved it. But we were seriously threatened in the Rialto one night. Some feller got stabbed in the face with a pair of scissors and I was told, “You and your mate are next.” We were out of there like a shot. We didn’t like that at all. That was me and Richy—out the door.
—Tune In (Ch. 7, July 15–Dec 15, 1957)
A jukebox pumped out records when the Hurricanes took a break and [Ringo] was easily the best jiver in the group, never short of a dance partner. Margaret Douglas, on holiday here from Liverpool, says, “Ringo was a brilliant rock ’n’ roll dancer. He knew all the moves.”26
—Tune In (Ch. 15, May 31–Aug 15, 1960)
196 notes · View notes
nerdpoe · 1 year
Text
straight up batman au where everything is the same EXCEPT
Damian is missing his two front teeth when he meets Tim.
Dick never got rid of the mullet
Alfred is Australian for some reason
and Bruce wears that dumb fuckin rainbow batman costume whenever Jason acts up
228 notes · View notes
I reread The Secret History and am completely chilled by how much danger Richard is in. From the moment he knows about the first murder, the group is always othering him in a way that sets him up for failure. You don't realize it immediately but when you do… man those people are ready to blame him for murder. Having him go see the movies,,, leaving him on his own,,, their whispered conversations,,, yeah those people are not your friends Richard. pls run
24 notes · View notes
wat-the-cur · 2 years
Note
I feel like Richard and Sir Adrian were a u-haul couple like they had one date and were like 'yep that's my soulmate we're moving in, we're getting married, dont care that its barely been a month'.
I can absolutely see that. Like, they each just know they have to stick around, two days into the relationship.
3 notes · View notes
greeneyed-thestral · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
222 notes · View notes
comic-sans-chan · 8 months
Text
Sometimes I think about the fact that Q is canonically in love with Picard, like it is baked into the very foundation of his character, and it drives me absolutely batshit
59 notes · View notes
renegadesstuff · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Interrupted Caskett 🤭
60 notes · View notes