The thought has been swirling around in my brain for a while now and I think societies that focus on the community over the individual are not necessarily better or worse than societies that focus on the individual over the community.
If we assume that the social currency (or replacement of social currency) in individualized societies is money (you pay for dating services, you pay for caregivers, you pay for better access to job offers) then in community-focused societies it's networking (you take care and are taken care of, your family arranges potential partners, you know a person who knows a person who gives you a job).
Which means that in both cases there are people who can be inherently at a disadvantage because they don't have that currency.
In individualized society you could be deprived of money for any number of reasons, like being unlucky, lack of generational wealth, an exploitative system...
While in a community-focused society you might not have what it takes to build connections, you might be a of a lower status and thus not valuable to build connections with, you might be of a category that is assumed to do the care-working with nothing or less in return.
And that doesn't even go into how it's a false dichotomy anyways - money plays a big role in community-focused societies, too and networking is way more important in individualized societies (especially when it comes to getting a job) than most people want to acknowledge.
Anywho, these are my two cents - then again I'm from a pretty individualized country (Germany) and I've never lived anywhere else.
Maybe someone else would like to add to it?
9 notes
·
View notes
What do you think ?
Do you believe our hair is our antennas? Do you believe that is were we generate our energy ?
1K notes
·
View notes
orange peel theory this pomegranate peel theory that. but have you thought about badaam peel theory? when they soak the almonds overnight and peel them in the morning for you. now that right there is love at its peak.
630 notes
·
View notes
What if I did something horrible to my notification box.
I made a poll with some of the newer trends. I vastly miscalculated what the results would be due to how close the Ides were and how few people knew about the rosin thing.
But now, I redeem myself with the classics and I'll probably miss one so feel free to reblog and make fun of me for it so I can get a larger sample size.
Have fun (:
330 notes
·
View notes
Arya learned the Braavosi language and culture well enough to pass as someone "born and bred" there while interacting with actual native Braavosi, but I'm supposed to think she's going to have difficulty navigating Westerosi noble life...as someone who was actually raised as a Westerosi noble? The way you can tell that people don't think before they "theorize" about Arya will always crack me up
390 notes
·
View notes
As much as I love learning about and discussing different magical theories, I think I can firmly say that the best way to do magic is to...actually do magic. Like in Skyrim, where in order to level up a skill, you have to actually use it.
668 notes
·
View notes
Sigh. I’ve had conflict with this person in the past, and I’ve been avoiding talking about them again, but this is especially egregious and I do want to address it.
How do you think the language and religion spread? People didn’t just decide to switch over en masse, they were conquered. It’s ahistorical to deny that.
The idea that Jews are “white” is complicated, but the idea that Jews possess whiteness is a relatively new concept. Conversations about this have been going on inside the Jewish community for a while. The key there is that it’s inside the community. The idea that this individual feels they, as a non-Jew, are the arbiter of Jewish identity is disgusting.
The idea that Jews aren’t the “real Jews” is not only blatantly antisemitic, it plays into conspiracy theories.
The use of Jewish tags (jumblr, am yisrael chai) are yet another instance of this individual trying to make sure Jews see this post, even when those tags are incorrect. This is clearly harassing, and this user does it frequently.
360 notes
·
View notes
This is "atheism is a religion." Or "atheists are angry at god/worship the devil/worship themselves." They won't let you just not be part of the thing. Saying you're not part of the thing becomes a way of being part of the thing.
No, I don't accept the underlying premise of your belief, that incorporeal sexed thetans have been incompetently sorted by Xenu's intern into mismatched meat prisons.
I don't know who told you that every mundane thing about your personality deserves its own flag and special day, but you've been wildly misinformed.
551 notes
·
View notes