Tumgik
#nb jews
gay-impressionist · 2 years
Text
AN ODE TO QUEER JOY
Part 1 : Joy in each other (Community)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
@artbyeloquent / lil nas x and elton john wearing a rendition of each other's iconic costumes. photographer unknown / @ghostcauliflower / alison bechdel / @android-boy / heartstopper : scene where nick, a bisexual boy, sees his two lesbian friends kiss. gif by @nicks-nelson / @canaryomenharbinger / shatzi weisberger with three unknown people / anonymous / new york city 2021 pride parade. photographer unknown
2K notes · View notes
justasunflowerseed · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
so I bought this flag last pride and ever since then I had this idea for a drawing in my head that wouldn't leave me alone, and now I finally had time to sit down and draw it!!! it turned out so well too, I don't usually shade with brown but it worked out better than I expected.
34 notes · View notes
homosociallyyours · 1 year
Text
WHO IS WATCHING BEST IN BRUNCH? I need to yell about how good it is (VERY) and also I need to say that Catie is basically the definition of My Type in a way that HURTS
0 notes
I'm off to fringe for a few days soon, do you have any recommendations on who to see this year?
I have no idea of what kind of comedy you like, but I do have a few! Although if you ask me in a week I may have more, as my husband will have had chance to see more and rec them to me; I'll be going up later in the month. But I have seen some in preview and heard great things about others.
Steffan Alun: Free Stand-Up Will Blow Your Mind. 11.45am, Just the Tonic at the Mash House.
Very good show this year, and when I saw it in final preview a woman in front of me very literally cried with laughter at one point, and had to take her glasses off to dry her face. It's about approaching middle age and wondering if you're a role model, and it's his usual style: very anecdotal, lil bit moral and political, very optimistic, and very Welsh. Owing to some Fringe Bollocks he's not in a great time slot, so every audience member is very appreciated this year, because it's a fantastic show that deserves more coverage than it's going to get (why do we even HAVE morning time slots...)
Josh Elton: Mountain Jew. 13.45, Brewdog
Another one I've seen in preview! Josh is a Welsh Jewish comedian and his show this year is about labels, and the benefits and drawbacks of them (eventually examining his own). It's charming and irreverent and makes good points while being hilarious.
Cerys Bradley: Not Overthinking Things 2019. 15.30, the Alcove at Laughing Horse @ Bar 50
A Tumblr darling, if only Tumblr kept up with comedy outside of famous TV comedians. Cerys is NB and autistic and had one of my favourite shows last year - it was about how they joined a women's rugby team and had to navigate being unfit, socially awkward, and trans. It was amazing. According to Steff, this year's show is even better, so it's first on my own list to watch when I get the chance. (Also Cerys is an absolute delight on a personal level. This is rare in a comedian. I mean, so is everyone else on this list, but eh.)
Jake Baker: Alone Together. 17.30, Just the Tonic at the Caves.
Another I saw in preview and Very Enjoyed! Gently political but charmingly whimsical and extremely funny, and I saw a relatively early preview so it'll be even better now. Jake has a really lovely stage presence, kind of sweet and slightly shy, which means you feel at ease but are therefore floored all the more when the bigger hooks come. Really good show.
Priya Hall: Grandmother's Daughter. 16.20, Monkey Barrel 2.
God, I remember when Priya did her fifth ever gig. At the end the MC, pro Welsh comic Matt Rees, got up to see her off the stage, and once she'd sat down he went "So...was that really your fifth gig?" And when she said yes, he said "Because... I don't know if anyone has told you yet, but... it's considered courtesy among comedians if, when you're starting out, you remember to be shit for a while."
We knew she'd be going places, is what I'm saying
Anyway, she's doing her debut! And I believe it's about her quest with her girlfriend to become parents, while talking about the role her Indian grandmother played in her Welsh family. I haven't seen it yet but I intend to.
Sooz Kempner: Y2K Woman. 15.45, Underbelly, Bristo Square
They've all been free or pay what you want so far, but this is the first of two ticketed shows in the Big Four that I'll flag up. £11 a standard ticket, £10 a concession, but with the Big Four keep an eye on the specials board - plus they often do two for one offers on tickets on Mondays and Tuesdays, so see if her show is included in that.
It's about late 90s/early 00s nostalgia, and also the fact that she's starring in a really interesting Doctor Who mixed media spin off project atm that hardcore Doctor Who fans hate and are furious about for reasons of being boring nerds with zero fun.
Alice Fraser: Twist. 20.30, Underbelly, Bristo Square
Honest to God the woman is just. A master. A maestro. A goddess of comedy. She could read the phone book and you'd be in hysterics, plus rolling around on the floor. You could receive news that every single person you'd ever met and liked had all been accidentally jettisoned into space in a freak accident involving a Tesla crashing into a SpaceX rocket, and you'd still laugh yourself sick at her show. She's breathtaking. Go and see her.
62 notes · View notes
koffing-time · 9 months
Text
//OOC ANNOUNCEMENT
//not pink for readabiltiy
//I've seen some posts going around the community, like "reblog if you think x belongs in the community" or "reblog if you think y is valid" or whatever. I'm not reblogging these on purpose. These kind of posts make me nervous and uncomfortable, they give me the same vibe as these weird "if you share the golden frog, you will get promoted" posts. I just don't like them.
//HOWEVER! Of course everyone is welcome here, if you're not like, a bigoted asshole, a TERF or nazi or shit. You know? I know that people could feel left out if i don't reblog these posts, which is why i make this one.
Like, if you're a jew, you're welcome. If you're muslim, christian, buddhist, taoist, hindu or whatever religion? You're welcome. You're welcome if you're trans, if you're cis, if you're NB or identify with a more specific label. Demiboy? come here. genderfae? let's go. all of you. I do not care if you're straight, gay, lesbian, bi, ace or something else. You're welcome on this blog. You use they/them pronouns? that's perfectly fine! You stick to he/him? let's go. It/its? yeah baby! neopronouns? HOLY SHIT (i might get them wrong, pls be patient). You're also welcome if you're black, asian, white, hispanic, some other ethnicity. You're welcome if you're disabled, depressed, DID or something. (idk terms for a lot of things, again, if i get something wrong, pls be patient and tell me)
//basically... I DO NOT DISCRIMINATE! IF I MAKE A MISTAKE, PLEASE LET ME KNOW AND I WILL TRY TO FIX IT!
(and if i tell you to leave (or probably rather block you), it's not because of who you are, it's because of what you did)
78 notes · View notes
akajustmerry · 5 months
Note
Also another good YouTuber that hbomberguy recommended was Kaz Rowe, they're a nb lesbian and anti-Zionist Jew, who actually does their research and credits their sources. They're vid of Triboulet, the court jester, and the meme of the jester "slapping" ass was actually made by a redditor, who edited the Wikipedia page. The whole journey of the vid showed how Kaz actually went through the steps to find the sources mentioned but not J*mes. Also besides wacky Victorian history, occasional medieval history, queer history, etc. Kaz's videos are really thought out, have great sets as their channel develops overtime, and actually cites their sources. Sorry for the long ask but I thought they should be mentioned too.
omg yes. love kaz rowe. their video historically analysing the national treasure movies is such a great analysis of the way the treasure hunting genre treats history! also love their video about the real history of ghost hunting because it inspired me to write a story <3
19 notes · View notes
Note
Lololol I’m another Black Jew and I love how we just came out to all essentially say f-ck that anon 😂 too many nonJewish Black and nonBlack ppl are constantly trying to put (nonBlack) Jews against Black people and it’s so insane to me. Like one of our oldest diasporas are literally Black Africans?? And many nb Jews in America were so involved in freedom fighting and civil rights movements you could literally build an entire field of study that’s just talking about Jewish activism lol.
Ntm the solidarity between Black American soldiers and Jews during WWII, who unlike their White counterparts actually seemed to care about helping Jewish people, and did it because they felt they could relate to us and not because they were just told orders. But because they actually cared.
Ntm the many communities of Black Jews throughout American history who felt connected to the biblical stories of the Israelites fleeing persecution so much that they literally converted to Judaism. It’s sad that unfortunately more Black Americans are going towards white supremacist conspiracies of Jews running the world and turning into Hebrew Israelites, but even this is relatively recent and isn’t even believed by the majority of us. But anyways, it’s just really weird to see this recent trend. I’m involved in many black spaces and it gets very awkward and unwelcoming sometimes bc I see this happen a lot.
Yeah like.....Black and Jewish solidarity goes way back, this divide between Black non-Jews and non-Black Jews only serves to make us both vulnerable to white supremacists (and alienate Black Jews). We're stronger together. When I was in Middle and High School I was part of a chess team that was primarily made up of Black kids and Jewish kids, and the cultural exchange and solidarity was incredible. We have so much in common and have such common goals, we need to and have to stop letting white supremacy try to drive a wedge between us.
86 notes · View notes
stoplookingup · 26 days
Text
Tumblr media
I just finished rewatching Star Trek Enterprise S3, aka the Xindi arc, and realized something I'd missed before. Don't know if it's been discussed elsewhere, but anyway....
The S3 story of a horrific attack on Earth by distant aliens who see humans as their worst enemy, and the Enterprise going after them to prevent Earth's annihilation, was explicitly inspired by 9/11. The showrunners said as much. Like most Enterprise fans, I've always appreciated the gradual development of the arc from a story about angry, grieving humans thirsty for revenge to one of diplomacy, mutual understanding, and cooperation.
But...cooperation against whom? Turns out there's a shadowy cabal behind the whole ugly mess. Literally shadowy. They're beings from a transdimensional realm who are transforming the fabric of space to be hospitable to their kind and uninhabitable by anyone else. They know that in the future, Earth will play a key part in defeating them, so they operate secretly and deceitfully to change the time line, manipulate the Xindi into destroying Earth, and prevent that future from coming to pass.
So...conspirators, puppet masters pulling the strings, a hidden enemy who's been there all along, controlling everything, with only their own interests at heart, causing suffering, death and destruction for their own benefit. In a story about 9/11. That's...troubling.
Almost immediately after 9/11, conspiracy theories began to circulate about who was "behind" the attack. A common one:
"The New World Order (NWO) is a conspiracy theory in which adherents believe that a cabal of powerful elites is secretly implementing a dystopian international governing structure that will grant them complete control over the global populace....Many modern-day conspiracy theories – including the NWO theory – have anti-Semitic origins....Within these narratives, Jewish people are frequently framed as the orchestrators of global events and accused of creating a supranational governing structure for nefarious purposes. These dangerous narratives are still widely promoted today....The NWO’s application within American discourse can be seen through the reaction to major events, such as the 9/11 terrorist attacks. As millions mourned, questions naturally arose as to culpable parties and their potential motives....Conspiracy theorists took advantage of the emotional turmoil to further sow their conspiratorial beliefs. NWO adherents were no exception and stood as major players in this conspiratorial competition."
-- Middlebury Institute of International Studies
No, I am not saying Star Trek writers were intentionally promoting antisemitism on Enterprise, any more than they were when they created the greedy Ferengi or the Illyrians-as-conversos. Star Trek is chock-a-block with cringy, unintentionally racist alien stereotypes, doubtless due mostly to lazy, thoughtless writing. What I am saying is that a lot of stuff floating around in the zeitgeist -- stereotypes, myths, conspiracy theories, etc -- makes its way into popular culture and implants an attitude that predisposes people to at least find it plausible that this is how things work, this is a thing that happens, this has some basis in reality. As story-telling creatures, humans are really good at finding the hidden messages and lessons. These story elements prime the pump. When people then encounter conspiracy theories steeped in bias, at least some will be disposed to think, "Yeah, sounds reasonable, an international conspiracy of Jews (or whoever) explains a lot," or at least, they'll buy into the vague notion that Jews (and Others) are disloyal, untrustworthy, etc.
So, hey, Star Trek writers, and all writers: Do better. Please.
NB: I still think Enterprise is kick-ass Star Trek. What would my life be without problematic faves?
7 notes · View notes
olderthannetfic · 1 year
Note
Goyim goysplaining shit to me is why I don't write Jewish characters anymore. "Well actually that name is this AGAB so the character isn't NB they're *insert AGAB here*" "well actually according to Google you shouldn't have used the word candle you should have said this" "well actually goy is a slur and it's not bad of commenters to use 'Hebrews' to refer to all Jewish people even though I *will* get mad if you call Catholics 'Latins' in response" "well actually it's a kippah not a yarmulke you can't use the word yarmulke it's a kippah" "well actually Jewish people are white so why is this Beta Israeli character not white Jewish = white" "uh excuse me but your Jewish characters didn't exchange Hebrew names that's really unrealistic" "uh excuse me why is your character breaking kosher to stay alive? everything I see on TV says Jews would rather die than break kosher and live - no I don't know or care that pikuach nefesh is a thing I just wanted to correct you on the proper way to write a Jewish character" etc. Whether it's goyim commenting on Undertale fanfics to say all Jewish people would be Red souls (because we don't have individual souls, personalities and colors like the non-Jewish characters, that'd be silly) because we survived the Holocaust or goyim saying Jewish Bruce Wayne makes sense because Jews have all the money, or being confused on how you can headcanon anyone as Jewish who isn't white because Jewish people are white (which is a surprise to my Iranian Jewish self but go off I guess) there is always someone there to tell you that you're not human like other people. These people would never go "oh Latinos all have Red souls and the same personality, definitely" or "Muslim Bruce Wayne makes sense, those people all have oil money" but they'll say antisemitic shit right to your face and then have the gall to be annoyed when you don't like it.
This is why I pulled all my fic without leaving copies up for archives. "B-but I love your fic it's the only multichaptered one for this rarepair!" Well you didn't respect me enough not to say Jews have all the money, so fuck you. "Nooo I loved that fic it had such a good magic system!" Yeah well I didn't love being told my "race" shares a single personality type/soul color so tough shit.
And then afterwards of course they write "Jewish Batfam" fic where there's 1 line in the entire thing where one character mentions Hanukkah once and they pat themselves on the back for being such good, diverse, inclusive writers. They're so woke and accepting and galaxy brained, devoid of prejudice, aren't you going to pat them on the back for clogging up Jewish related tags with fic where skipping one line could erase all presence of Judaism from it? No? Well then why don't you go write your own fic then?!
It's a rhetorical question, but here's the non-rhetorical answer: I don't go write my own fic because I'm tired of having to hear Jewish people talked about the way y'all talk about Tolkien's elves or Undertale's monsters and having to advocate for the idea of treating Jewish people like people is exhausting work.
Literally the only fandom I've ever been in that didn't go "oh well that's just fandom! if you don't like it don't write fics lol" was Star Trek. And even then, you venture outside of AO3 at your own risk.
--
47 notes · View notes
dukeofankh · 8 months
Note
hey i really really appreciate your posts abt purity culture, desire and objectification and your perspective as an ex-evangelical!! having been born and raised a jew myself i've always been aware of how bullshit all of that stuff is, but not really able to articulate it as specifically as you seem able to, and i find your eloquence really impressive. with that known, i actually have a specific thing that's been bothering me, and i think it's an evangelical purity culture based thing, and hinges on that distinction you made in a post abt a week ago abt how to a lot of people "objectification" = "looking with lust" = "basically adultery"-- okay here goes:
on gay tiktok, there is currently a trend of women (or some nb ppl) who are attracted to women commenting on thirst-traps posted by women the memetic phrase "i am no better than a man".
now this really rubs me the wrong way for a lot of reasons (mainly: contextually this is almost always on videos that are INTENDED to be sexy so why is it weird to find this woman, who filmed and edited this video to be sexy, sexy?? AND what the hell do you mean abt gender by saying this???? women can't desire people?? men can only desire in predatory ways???), and it's weird in that specific way where i'm like. i smell weird cultural christian values embedded in this. but i can't quite articulate the way it all fits together.
this may be way out of line for me to bother you in your inbox like this, but i was hoping to get your take? your ability to explain this stuff clearly and with context i never knew existed is really valuable and while i have seen people responding on tumblr to say "uhhh don't say this", they haven't really articulated what's driving people to say such a specific thing, so much that it becomes a meme.
if u feel this isn't something you want to speak on, that's totally fine! and i just want to say thank you again for your thoughtful posts.
also i feel very weird abt dropping this veritable essay in your inbox so sorry!!
Tumblr media
No worries! I love to talk, and I already have opinions on that particular meme 😆.
You've definitely gotten the gist of it, yeah. It's a bunch of unexamined sexist ideas about sex and desire repackaged in the sort of fun memey "it's not that deep, chill out" shell that absolutely thrives on social media. Some of it's Christian, some of it is the radfem repackaging of Christian ideas.
Basically, the version of Sexual Objectification championed by radfem writers like Dworkin was adapted from Immanuel Kant, a Christian philosopher/theologian, so it's not just cultural Christianity, it's also a direct intellectual connection. They just changed the idea from "all people, when overtaken by lust, cease to see people as people and can see them only as means to achieve their sinful sexual gratification. This cannot be avoided, but can be balanced out by keeping sex within a marriage that is otherwise built on commitment and respect," to "Men, when overtaken by lust, cease to see women as people and can see them only as a means to achieve their sinful sexual gratification (due to their patriarchal training to harm and dominate). This cannot be avoided, especially not by marriage, which is one of the main ways the Patriarchy codifies the subjugation of women to men."
Basically, Radfems and Christians get along because Radfems feel the same way about masculine sexuality that Christian men feel about their own sexuality. As for women...both Radfems and more modern Christians are pretty sure that women don't Do Lust in the same way men do. Like, women see people as ends in and of themselves, as fellow Subjects. Men see women as objects. As means to an end, that end being their own sexual gratification.
A few decades later and after a fair bit of social media iteration, we get to this weird point.
What they're basically saying is, "god damn. I swiped onto this thirst trap and I didn't even think about your personality or your accomplishments or anything. I literally just saw big jiggly titties and that's all I can think about. I am sexually attracted to you, and yet it isn't reflective of your soul or a deep connection between us or anything, despite the fact that I'm a woman and I'm supposed to be above just liking your body and that turning me on. Huh. This is what I have heard people describe men's sexuality as being like. You are so sexy that you are causing me to act as badly as men do."
Tumblr media
See also: the way tiktok has redefined "the male gaze" and "the female gaze" to just mean "stuff men vs. women respectively like to look at" with most explicitly sexualized visual media being assigned to the former. Women are supposed to like things subtler than that.
Like, saying "I am no better than a man" could be a push to re-examine whether maybe a celibate 18th century theologian/philosopher is a bad foundation for your understanding of sexual desire. I would like to think that for some of these women it probably is sparking self reflection, going "huh, yeah, I guess we all do this."
But as a meme, honestly, even as it claims to lower ones own status I think it still maintains a claim of moral superiority? Like, "yeah, I'm being a horndog, but I am self aware about it. I can tell that I'm being horny on main right now, and it's something that has been conditionally activated by this very sexy thirst trap. Men are like this all the time and they don't even know."
I, obviously, don't like that. I don't like people saying "I'm acting like a man" when they mean "I'm perving on you", I don't like ranking a lack of desire as being better than desire, I don't like ranking genders or better or worse than another. I don't think it's causing problems as much as it's reflecting problems that have been there for a long time, but hey, it stinks.
25 notes · View notes
beneaththemasks · 9 months
Text
fuck the economy and whatever. my country is about to go through another dictatorship if nobody makes this stop and I'm not being overdramatic. THIS GUY WANTS YOU
JEW
BLACK
POOR
WORKING CLASS
GAY, LESBIAN, NB, TRANS
WOMEN
YOUNG
fucking dead. DO NOT VOTE MILEI. HE WON'T MAKE OUR COUNTRY GREAT. HE WON'T BREAK US OUT OF THIS SYSTEM.
20 notes · View notes
kimyoonmiauthor · 3 months
Text
Terf: Define a woman.
Yeah, writer, NB here, and generally, I LOVE etymology and being both Korean and Jewish, both cultures have a thing for debating in different tactics. Jews, in particular, have a thing for arguing about words. (well, some of us–it mostly has to do with Torah reading, and meaning, but getting into that is a whole chore.).
How to answer this with queer joy:
Terf: I think words have meaning. Define a woman.
Sure. Woman is a wife man. See, the Etymology is from old English.
So, if you think about it, it's defining this person by their role, in what? Society. WIFE is not a natural construct. It's a social construction and does not refer to genitalia at all. Which means the root of the word is also a social construction.
Terf: I meant female.
Me: Oh... well then, the etymology of female is...
Tumblr media Tumblr media
One who can suckle.
Male and female do not have the same etymological root, BTW. And despite what linguists argued on this one long twitter rant, yes, it is quite sexist to define someone by their breasts?
But even so, men do have the organs to *also* suckle babies.
There are historical cases of this in this article.
So technically, men can be female by the original meaning. Because the root of the word feminine and female are the same: dhe(i), to suck.
Tumblr media
The attributes of a man in which it's described by his presentation, is attested only to the 1500's, which is long after the fall of the roman empire. The original usage was to gender nouns, which has fallen in English steadily since long before Chaucer.
Tumblr media
Emasculate is attributed to the 1600's.
Thus, women can be men. And men can be women. It's very liquid by the original definition and actual biology. And as long as a person can suckle, they can be female.
BTW, Chinese, 女 is a person 人 who sits. Meaning she's in the house all day.
This also is a SOCIAL construct of the word. Do you find houses in NATURE?
(If they haven't fallen asleep by this time. Haha. As an Asian accused of not knowing English well, or whatever racists like to get up to, I LOVE doing this type of thing to them.)
And in fact the start of defining male v. female and woman and man as gender roles coincides with the rise of the patriarchy, and if you notice the dates, English colonialism, as they started to encounter cultures that did presentations of gender different from them. This might not have been the sole two motivating factors, but shouldn't you, "defending women's rights" think seriously on that fact? In order to suppress women, they needed to shift the meaning of those words.
Terf: But I mean people shouldn't use they.
Me:
Etymology:
Tumblr media
See, because the original word was hie, which only referred to plural of he, not she. So they switched to a gender neutral word, thai. (Which BTW, is hilarious to me, since Thailand it's the only place to not have their plural gender system ravaged by colonialism. Yes, the sound of the words is different, but if the person is going that far into semantics, they can eat the shift of the masculine and feminine gender root to neuter too.) Anyway, the original is from Indo-European, likely meaning "this" "That" making it not gendered, but was gendered to only mean men along the way, but then was degendered
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/s%C3%B3
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/sa
Singular usage is attested back to William Shakespeare according to Webster's dictionary, singular they was in usage in early Modern English.
Tumblr media
William Shakespeare, who, BTW, had men dress up as women which is still a strong part of pantomime today.
Also, for those who look at the Bible: James, the King that enforced this rule for the stage: No women on stage, is said to have been interested romantically and sexually in men and women. Yes, the one that translated the Bible to English, the King James Bible, was attracted to men and women and had sex with both.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
This is LONG before Shakespeare.
This means early court cases could recognize gender nonconforming people, thus Shakespeare, who was in the company of queers, and crossdressers was likely to have.
There is even debate about Shakespeare's sexuality as an icon who was attracted to men and women. Plus he wrote about cross dressing in his plays. As You Like it.
So yes, Queer people always existed and it was actually legally recognize way back when in the English language.
If they haven't blocked you by this time... they are likely going to go into how people shouldn't enhance biological sex and change it, and then oh, you have science on your side.
You can go into the history of how testosterone was made and how men used it to enhance their feelings of gender.
You can go into how estrogen was used and applied. And ask them if they think that estrogen is evil when it is in biological males. And if they hate the idea of birth control, "the pill" for women.
You can go over brain science in humans and how a super male is actually gay. Haha. Make their heads explode.
And by this time while you're having queer joy, they are angry and blocking you, but you've won because you have redefine a bit of semantics and science with evidence.
tldr;
Female, one who can suckle, but males can suckle too. Woman, Wife man. Singular They: first attested to Shakespeare, and the birth of Modern English. Shakespeare and King James VI who were also bi. Male and masculine in terms of presentation, rise of the patriarchy and colonization. Gay person? A super masculine man, according to nature. GNC was legally recognized by English law in 1395.
And the terf is going to have to cry and take it.
10 notes · View notes
beta-lactam-allergic · 6 months
Text
I find it stupid that there are arguments within the trans community to the point that we have insults like "truscum" & "tucute" inside the community.
I'm a binary transwoman & I don't get why any other binary transperson would pick on non-binary (NB) or genderfluid people. How is doing that any different from cisgender bigots picking on us? Why would we expect gender identity to be binary when sexuality is a spectrum & when BIOLOGICAL SEX IS ALSO A SPECTRUM. Seriously there are so many intersexed conditions that our binary focused society just ignores or pathologises, it's disgraceful.
I had my surgeries (FFS, trachael shave, breast implants & bottom surgery) because I wanted them but I don't expect all or even most transgender people to have surgeries.
Not everyone wants surgery. Some can fix their dysphoria by social transitioning alone. Others will use hormones without surgery (if AMAB usually also use body & facial hair removal methods like laser or electrolysis). I don't see how only needing this is any less than valid than me needing & getting the surgeries to fix it.
Of those who do want surgery, not everyone wants the full works.
Some AFAB (whether Non-binary, gender fluid or binary trans-male) only want top surgery not bottom surgery as their dysphoria is connected to their breasts. If that's all they want, than I don't see the issue.
Some AMAB (whether NB, gender-fluid or binary trans-woman) only want FFS & a trachael shave. I don't see the issue here either, tucking works perfectly well if the dysphoria isn't connected to having a dick (mine was) & all you need to do is pass. As for breasts, some people win the genetic lottery & grow C cups or D cups on hormones alone. Some are satisfied with breast forms. I was unfortunate enough to not be satisfied with breast forms & to want a B-cup whilst only having an A-cup because my genetics means that I can stuff my face with food & do no exercise without gaining much weight, which means minimal fat to redistribute.
Some people are scared of the risks of surgery. That's fine, bottom surgery is dangerous, so is FFS for that matter. I went into both knowing that, knowing the ways I could either die or be permanently impacted by a failed surgery. The surgeon I had for bottom surgery asked me if I was aware of the risks before agreeing to schedule an operation date. I'm pretty sure that if I didn't know the risks, he would've said no.
Even though my dysphoria was bad enough that I was willing to take the risk, & that risk paid off for me (I'm happy with my results & had no complications), I understand fully why some people just wouldn't take the risk. It doesn't make them less trans, it just means they prioritise decreased physical risk over increased mental comfort in their bodies.
And than many people who want surgery can't afford it. I only could because my parents allowed me to live under their roof rent free whilst I saved up for my surgeries.
To discriminate against those who can't afford it is too discriminate against our most needy, those either born to families too poor to help them or to bigoted families that kicked them out onto the streets for daring to be themselves. For someone who can afford what I got to tell those who can't afford it that they shouldn't have our support is class-based discrimination for its only an accident of birth separating us from them.
The bigots are coming for all of our heads. Gatekeeping & infighting just makes us weaker.
It doesn't matter if you are FTM, MTF, NB or fluid, if you are post-op, pre-op or non-op. It doesn't matter if you are rich or poor. If you are white, black, Asian or MENA. None of this will make the bigots decide to spare you. The bigots want all of us, anyone who isn't cis, cleansed from the Earth the same way Hitler wanted a world without Jews.
The bigots won't stop until we are all dead, either by their hands or by suicide. We need to unite together amongst ourselves & with the cis allies we have or could have (& if you're in the Anglosphere, polls suggest there are more potential allies than there are bigots, even in places where the bigots currently hold the levers of power like the UK & the US South). That's how we weather this storm, that's how we win.
12 notes · View notes
spacelazarwolf · 1 year
Note
What that person doesnt seem to get is that like while yes you cant opt out of being white, you can opt out of the gender binary otherwise trans and nb people wouldnt exist in the first place?
also tbh there is sort of an argument to be made abt opting out of whiteness. white presenting latines or asians or indigenous people or jews are often seen as white and receive privilege for that perception. we can’t really change what our bodies and faces look like. but we can absolutely reject assimilation into whiteness and white supremacy in favor of embracing our cultures. the way people treat me when i have a kippah on/look visibly jewish is very different than when i’m trying to blend in. i still look white, i still receive the safety that comes with that, that’s not going to change. but i can absolutely reject whiteness and the demand to assimilate.
41 notes · View notes
nbmc-isgay · 1 year
Text
Obey me random quotes part 28
Child!M!MC: I think I know the answer Mr. Garrison!
Child!Nb!MC: Mememememe! *sticks their tongue out at him*
Child!M!MC: SHUT UP SHORT KID!
Child!Nb!MC: AYE DONT CALL ME SHORT YA FUCKING JEW!
Mr Garrison: Nb did you just say the f word!?
Child!Nb!MC: ….Jew?
Child!M!MC: No he’s talking about fuck! You can’t say fuck in school you fucking dumbass!
Mr Garrison: M!
Child!Nb!MC: Why the fuck not!?
Mr Garrison: Nb!
Child!Gn!MC: Dude you just said fuck again!
Mr Garrison: GN!
Child!Satan: Fuck
Mr Garrison: SATAN!!!
Child!Nb!MC: what’s the big deal? It doesn’t hurt anybody! FUCKFUCKITYFUCKFUCKFUCK!
Mr Garrison: HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE SCHOOL COUNSELLOR!?
Child!Nb!MC: How would you like to fucking die?
Class: *gasp*
Mr Garrison: What did you say!?
Child!Nb!MC: Oh I’m sorry I’m sorry.. what I said was.. *grabs a speakerphone* How. Would. You. Like. To. Fucking. Die. Mr Garrison?
Later
Lucifer: So who would like to explain why I got a phone call from the school saying you guys were cursing causing the teacher to quit his job?
Child!M!MC: It was Nb!
Child!Nb!MC:WHAT!? YOU STARTED IT!!
Child!M!MC: WELL YOU MOCKED ME!!
Child!Nb!MC: BECAUSE YOU SOUNDED STUPID!!
Child!M!MC: YOU CALLED ME A JEW!!
Child!Nb!MC: THATS BECAUSE YOU ARE!!
Child!M!MC: NO IM NOT!!
Child!Nb!MC: YES YOU ARE!!
Lucifer: Kids..
Child!Nb!MC+Child!M!MC: *yelling at each other*
Lucifer: ENOUGH! You two are always fighting over something stupid! Do you want me to hang you upside down from the ceiling again!?
Both of them: No..
Lucifer: then stop your bickering and go to your rooms!
Both of them: Yes lucifer..
40 notes · View notes
nonbinary-vents · 3 months
Note
Hey, I saw your post about nobody listening to Jews and came to check out your vent blog. Saw the bit about tapping the flat part of your chest and that hit me pretty hard. This isn't a vent for you to post, just an older NB more-transmasc-type letting you know: it gets better. You'll be able to come out if you want. If there is *any* history of breast/ovarian cancer in your family, you can get a test for BRCA mutations (super common among us Ashkies) and get a preventive mastectomy (much easier to get coverage for than a "cosmetic" top surgery) and a hysterectomy. I can't guarantee that of course, but keep it in mind. Just wanted to reach out and let you know there are peeps out here who care and have been there. You can message me if you want to. עם ישראל חי!
Thank you for this. Weirdly, I'm not Ashkenazi but do actually have some breast cancer in my family, though it's verified as not genetic. It's really nice to see older nonbinary people (or even just ones who aren't under twenty five or something), it makes me feel a lot less stuck in time, if that makes any sense. We're not just a community of sad teenagers, we grow older and we transition. It just feels so far away, but at least it’s achievable
♥️ !עם ישראל חי
4 notes · View notes