@shrimpmajordomo thanks for the tag!!
List 5 topics you can talk on for an hour without preparing any material.
@gayafsatan @gingernut1314 @skarphedinn @gabegade let’s see 🧐
1. American folklore, don’t let me get into tribal stories and cryptids we will be there all day sorry like the real ones tho like animals we think are extinct but ppl swear they saw one and like myths in general
2. Movies, and other media studies related stuff. That was my double major in college bc it was easy to make it into one with the design/advertising degree I had lmao I also was a comp lit minor so I be analyzing things and watching video essays
3. The Manson Murders and The Golden State Killer. My dads favorite book was Helter Skelter so he was like u should read it when I was like 14 and my family is from California so I heard a few stories like I remember my mom saying the rumor for gsk was he targeted yellow houses and she lived in one (tho at the time he was the night stalker bc the other one I think)
Also forensic stuff but i blame the fact two teachers taught us that bc they saw dead bodies at some point (I was gonna keep going on this see what I mean)
4. Pirates. I loved it since I was a kid, I even that that pirateology book and in college took an anthropology course on pirates. Idk something about them I was like whoa!!! Cool!!! Also like cowboys? But I grew up in the west so I mean that’s most people lmao
5. Circuses. I was sooo into the old design at circus circus with the old circus posters and my mom watched hbo carnivale and I used to have night terrors featuring clowns so I was like let’s find out more shall we 🕵️
But maybe that’s just all ties into Americana and the culture of the early days of this country idk!
6 notes
·
View notes
okay but i think it says a lot about eddie that he clearly wanted to graduate high school.
in some way or another, it was clearly something he actually wanted to do, or he would have just dropped out when he flunked his first senior year.
but he didn't. he tried again. and again. those aren't the actions of someone who couldn't care less if they get a diploma or not. the whole school thinks he's a freak, he goes through the embarrassment every day of being the 20-year-old super-duper senior, but he does still go to school.
idk whether it might be partly on his uncle's suggestion (wayne seems to want the best for eddie and that probably means getting some qualifications), or whether he wants to do it for himself (to prove that he could, in fact, do it) but either way, instead of dropping out when he so easily could have (especially after his 2nd try) he didn't.
and this is why i so desperately wanted to see him graduate. it wasn't just about "getting out of this dump" (which he could have done years ago by dropping out) it was about proving he could do it, that he could accomplish this mile stone and then move on.
1K notes
·
View notes
but you know what the worst feeling in the world is? it's when something instantly reminds you of someone and for a flash of second you get giddy with excitement, thinking of sharing it with them but then there's the sudden shattering realisation that you're not close to them anymore and that you can't. when nostslia makes the walls of your throat tighten and your eyes water and you want to forget all the bad blood for that one stupid moment, just to share that one stupid thing. but you can't because the past is lost and your history is tainted and because its your pride and their ego and because its your hatred and its just so complicated. but then you go back to thinking that how did we end up here? where did we go wrong? how did we mess this up? and you were supposed to be here and i was supposed to be able to share my happiness with you and we were meant to last forever. but then the acceptance that you need to forget about them and move on because that's what adults do. because you're not a kid anymore and because you can't make up with people by greeting cards and chocolates anymore and because you need to quiet your heart and not be vulnerable anymore. but you still can't help but curse the universe because is it really supposed to hurt this bad? because why are you breaking apart? because, god, why didn't it last? so many lost friendships, so many lost loves, they come back to me in these instances. and i want to scream “look at what you have done, look at me choking up like a fool, look at me falling apart, and just look at me but dont pity me. and just tell me that you think of me but don't say that you miss me and just know that i loved you but also that i hate you, and that i was supposed to be able to share this silly little thing with you but i can't, I won't. and im sorry. but im not apologising. and im fine. but im probably pretending, and I'll put my mask back on but I'll mourn us behind it. and I'll move on. but i'll always treasure you in my memory.”
30 notes
·
View notes
So yesterday I read "Slimed with Gravy, Ringed by Drink" by Camille Ralphs, an article from the Poetry Foundation on the publication of the First Folio in 1623, a major work without which most of Shakespeare's plays might very well have been lost today, possibly the most influential secular work of literature in the world, you know.
It's a good article overall on the history and mysteries of the Folio. Lots of interesting stuff in there including how Shakespeare has been adapted, the state of many surviving Folios, theories of its accuracy to the text, a really interesting identification of John Milton's own copy currently in the Free Library of Philadelphia, and the fascinating annotations that may have influenced Milton's own poetry!!! Do read it. It's not an atrociously long article but there's a lot of thought-provoking information in there.
There's one paragraph in particular I keep coming back to though, so I'm just gonna quote it down here:
...[T]he Play on Shakespeare series, published by ACMRS Press, the publications division of the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies at Arizona State University... grew out of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival’s plan to “translate” Shakespeare for the current century, bills itself “a new First Folio for a new era.” The 39 newly-commissioned versions of Shakespeare’s plays were written primarily by contemporary dramatists, who were asked to follow the reasonable principle laid out by series editor Lue Douthit: tamper in the name of clarification but submit to “do no harm.” The project was inspired by something the linguist John McWhorter wrote in 1998: “[the] irony today is that the Russians, the French, and other people in foreign countries possess Shakespeare to a much greater extent than we do … [because] they get to enjoy Shakespeare in the language they speak.”
Mainly it's the John McWhorter thing I keep coming back to. Side note: any of my non-native-English-speaking mutuals who have read Shakespeare, I would love to know your experiences. If you have read him in translation, or in the original English, or a mix of both. It's something I do wonder about! Even as an Anglophone reader, I find my experience varies so much just based on which edition of the text I'm reading and how it's presented. There's just so much variety in how to read literature and I would love to know what forces have shaped your own relationships to the stories. But anyway...
The article then goes on to talk about how the anachronistic language in Shakespeare will only fall more and more out of intelligibility for everyone because of how language evolves and yadda yadda yadda. I'm not going to say that that's wrong but I think it massively overlooks the history of the English language and how modern standard English became modern standard English.
First of all, is Shakespeare's language completely unintelligible to native English speakers today? No. Certain words and grammatical tenses have fallen out of use. Many words have shifted in meaning. But with context aiding a contemporary reader, there are very few lines in Shakespeare where the meaning can be said to be "unknown," and abundant lines that are perfectly comprehensible today. On the other hand, it's worth mentioning how many double entendres are well preserved in modern understanding. And additionally, things like archaic grammar and vocabulary are simply hurdles to get over. Once you get familiarized with your thees and thous, they're no longer likely to trip you up so much.
But it's also doubtful that 400 years from now, as the article suggests, our everyday language will be as hard to understand for twenty-fifth century English speakers to comprehend. The English language has significantly stabilized due to colonialism and the international adoption of English as a lingua franca. There are countless dialects within English, but what we consider to be standard international "correct" English will probably not change so radically, since it is so well and far established. The development and proliferation of modern English took a lot of blood and money from the rest of the world, the legacy of which can never be fully restored.
And this was just barely in sight by the time that Shakespeare died. This is why the language of the Elizabethans and Jacobeans is early-modern English. It forms the foundations of modern English, hence why it's mostly intelligible to speakers today, but there are still many antiquated figures within it. Early-modern English was more fluid and liberal. Spelling had not been standardized. Many regions of England still had slight variations in preferences for things like pronouns and verb conjugation. We see this even in works Shakespeare cowrote with the likes of Fletcher and Middleton, as the article points out. Shakespeare's vocabulary may not just reflect style and sentiment, but his Stratford background. His preferences could be deemed more "rustic" than many of his peers reared in London.
Features that make English more consistent now were not formalized yet. That's why Shakespeare sounds so "old." It's not just him being fancy. And there's also the fact that blank verse plays are an entirely neglected art nowadays. Regardless of the comprehensibility of the English, it's still strange for modern audiences uninitiated to Elizabethan literature to sit there and watch a King drop mad poetry about his feelings on stage by himself. The form and style of the entire genre is off.
But that, to me, is why we should read Shakespeare. We SHOULD be challenged. It very much IS within the grasp of a literate adult fluent in English to read one of his plays, in a modern edition with proper assistance and context. It is GOOD to be acquainted with something unfamiliar to us, but within our reach. I'm serious. I do not think I'm so much smarter than everyone else because I read Shakespeare. I don't just read the plain text as it was printed in the First Folio! The scholarship exists which has made Shakespeare accessible to me, and I take advantage of that access for my own pleasure.
This is to say that I disagree with the notion that Shakespeare is better suited to be enjoyed in foreign tongues. I think that's quite a complacent, modern American take. Not to say that the sentiment of McWhorter is wrong; I get what he's saying. And it's quite a beautiful thing that Shakespeare's plays are still so commonly staged, although arguably that comes from a false notion in our culture that Shakespeare is high literature worth preserving, at the expense of the rest of time and history. It is true that his body of work has such a high level of privilege in the so-called Western literary canon that either numerous other writers equally deserve, or no writer ever could possibly deserve.
The effort that goes into making Shakespeare's twenty-first century legacy, though, is a half-assed one. So much illustrious praise and deification of the individual and his works, and yet not as much to understanding the context of his time and place, of his influences, forms, and impacts on the eras which proceeded him. Shakespeare seems to exist in a vacuum with his archaic language, and we read it once or twice in high school when we're forced to, with prosaic translations on the adjoining page. This does not inspire a true appreciation in a culture for Shakespeare but it does reinforce a stereotype that he must be somehow important. It's this shallow stereotype that makes it seem in many minds today that it would be worth it to rip the precise language out of the text of a poet, and spit back out an equivalent "modern translation."
11 notes
·
View notes
Just thought of this, but man, I bet my dude Iseldir didn't have a single grey hair until he realised an entirely untrained raw magic powerhouse just moved in next door. That has to be SO STRESSFUL FOR REAL bc imagine. You're a Druid living in Camelot, you've kept your camp under the radar so far, you're respected as a good leader and a wise elder, and suddenly you've got this. fucking. infant demigod. with power you, a lorekeeper, have literally never seen nor heard of, that starts randomly showing up at your fucking house every now and again, does some impossible feat of magic for fun, just to entertain the children, and then fucks off again for who knows how long, and oh yeah, it's 50-50 odds he'll show up with the goddamn Prince next time.
Iseldir probably made a Lot of offerings to the Triple Goddess.
Iseldir, in my humble opinion, was a fucking geek. "Lorekeeper," okay, please we all know that's just fancy words for ultimate nerd/geek, and that's Iseldir.
Sir was fucking ecstatic to realize he would be living in the same century as the Great Emrys. Then enters Merlin. A barely adult kiddo who holds untamed power that was foretold who knows how long. I find it admirable the old guy kept his cool for that long (10 bucks that after Merlin left, Iseldir had a personal crisis). But yeah, he was over the moon to be living in the same region and whenever some issue occurred in Camelot, Iseldir would probably be like "Ah yes, of course the Great Emrys vanquished another enemy!" or something.
And yeah, the hype is still there but Iseldir realizes (at some point) that merlin is still fairly young and hold so much magic and the kid isn't even fully trained???? We have 2 routes: Iseldir grows extremely fearful in like a "holy shit you have no idea what you're doing and maybe I should have helped you sooner" way or Iseldir just goes "OF COURSE THE GREAT EMRYS WOULD BE THIS POWERFUL" or something
anyway, Iseldir's a huge nerd for Emrys' trivia (this was what i was trying to get at and i think i derailed?) and would be the worst of the Druid's when it some to discovering Merlin's range of power and stuff
22 notes
·
View notes