#polysexual dividers

[animatedglittergraphics-n-more]

polysexual dividers

‹ free to use with credit ›

#polysexual dividers #mine #photo studio editor #online image editor.com #page dividers #line dividers #dividers #separators #polysexual pride #polysexual #pride #lgbtqia #transparent #pride dividers

[mogaimagic]

SWEET HEARTS P1 PRIDE DIVIDERS

sweet trans

sweet queer

sweet enby

sweet aro

sweet poly

sweet ace

sweet lesbian

sweet mspec

sweet gaylm

sweet hearts p2//sour hearts p1

#asexual #nonbinary #Polysexual #multisexual #lesbian #gaylm #gay #mlm #wlw #trans #aro #aromantic #transgender #enby #ace #graphics #blinkies #dividers #sweet n sour #animated graphics

[catlesboy]

Ciao, everyone! I saw some people had created cute, blink-y hearts pride dividers, so I wanted to contribute via the host’s Photoshop knowledge! :33 They are bi-, poly-, pan-, and trans! I think I will make them bigger next time!

#I've made a bunch more I shall add to the queue! :33 #Fabian makes stuff! #pride #lgbtq+ #graphics #pride edits #hearts #dividers #bi #bisexual #pan #pansexual #poly #polysexual #trans #transgender #flashing cw #queer

[cutiesgawr]

(🌊) CUTIESGAWR NAVIGATION (🌊)

𝙞𝙛 𝙪𝙣𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚, 𝙛𝙚𝙚𝙡 𝙛𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙩𝙤 swim away 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 ! block gawr if uncomfortable !

(★) ִ— ୨ৎ you can call me : gawr/sharky ! I use hir/they/shark/gawr/princess & pansexual/polysexual ! Anyone can read my works ! I write; angst, smut, fluff ! gawr's selfships; kazuha, ayato, nilou, scara, childe, aether, rosaria, atsushi, sigma, fyodor ! >< I love nilou and kiara

(⁠✿) ִ— ୨ৎ tags; #🦈gawr’s waters! = works | #🦈gawr’s blood! = dark content | #🦈gawr’s teeth! = angst | #🦈gawr’s gummy! = Fluff | #🦈gawr’s mating! = smut | #🦈gawr’s sharkys! = moots! | #🦈gawr’s mate/pretty treasure! = <3 | #🦈gawr’s fins! = asks | #🦈gawr’s swimming! = random | #🦈gawr’s older one! = My irl older sibling | #🦈gawr's leftovers! = Reblogs. 🦈gawr's sweethon! = Irl sweetheart (kinda? All we did was kisses eachother cheeks and just call eachother Petnames but never said that we are dating:3)

{Tags in the bottom so u could find it}

(♡) ִ— ୨ৎ request rules! = Will do: any genders of readers(male,female,gn,nb,trans), any kinks, fluff, angst, gore, horrorp0rn(?), cannibalism, wlw, mlm, platonic, dead dove: do not eat works, incest, non/dubcon! Will not do: Adult x child, Romantic stuff with child characters, scat kink! I write for; genshin, bsd, hsr, tokyorev, blue lock, obey me, twisted wonderland, demon Slayer, chainsaw man, original characters !

GAWR'S SHARKYS [moots] !!

(⁠๑) ִ— ୨ৎ gawr’s herd(anons)! [U can be anything, emoji or name!) || :3 anon, 🎀 anon, 🦈🦈🦈🦈 anon, vamp anon, 💩 anon

(🌀🦈) GAWR’S MASTERLIST !

another one will be added if needed ! 🦈

©2024 CUTIESGAWR | do not copy, plagiarize, or translate my work + dividers/headers are not made by me & some are made by me !

#cutiesgawr #gawr's navi #🦈gawr's waters! #🦈gawr's blood! #🦈gawr's leftovers! #🦈gawr's teeth! #🦈gawr's gummy! #🦈gawr's mating! #🦈gawr's mate! #🦈gawr's sharkys! #🦈gawr's fins! #🦈gawr's swimming! #🦈gawr's older one! #🦈gawr's pretty treasure!

[gay-otlc]

to preface this ask: im not trying to be rude or disrespectful, im just trying to learn/see where you’re coming from.

how can someone identify as a mspec lesbian? the definition of lesbian is non-men loving non-men? if someone is mspec, it implies that they are attracted to men. the whole point of lesbianism is to not include men. someone can’t be a lesbian if they are a man or attracted to men, can they? i understand that sexuality is fluid, but if a person is currently at a point where they are a non-man loving only non-men, then that person could identify as a lesbian. is it not lesbiphobic to imply that lesbianism has anything to do with men, when the entire point of it is that it doesn’t involve men?

I'm not an mspec lesbian, but I've been researching and involved in discourse for about a year now, so I'll give it a shot. @bi-lesbian has a lot of good information on faer blog if you want to check that out.

(1) The non-men loving non-men definition is... not something I'm a fan of. That throws the complexity of gender out the window and comes off as equating nonbinary lesbians to Basically Women. This definition leaves out multigender lesbians (like me!), nonbinary lesbians with a partial connection to maleness, or genderfluid lesbians who are sometimes men. The definitions I like that are more inclusive are "queer attraction to women" or "women, or those with some connection to womanhood, who love women (or those with some connection to womanhood)."

(2) The "whole point" of lesbianism is NOT to not include men. The "whole point" of lesbianism is ✨women✨. I don't want to define myself around men, full stop. I'm a lesbian because I love women and whether I'm attracted to men or not has nothing to do with it. Not everything has to be about men, jfc tumblr. (Anger is not necessarily directed at you, anon, just the partriarchy that taught us we have to talk about men all the time constantly).

(3) See point (1) for someone identifying as both a man and a lesbian, and as far as being unable to identify as a lesbian and also being attracted to men... pre-1970s, the term lesbian included all women (and transmasc/nonbinary people though the terminology wasn't quite there yet) who loved women. Bisexuals and other mspecs, totally included. Then, radfems- because it's always radfems- decided "eww man icky" and pushed anyone associated with men out of their community. Bisexuals were excluded from lesbian spaces and had to form their own community, but lesbian used to include all WLW (functionally how we might use sapphic now) and some people want to reclaim the historical definition.

(4) Sexuality is fluid, and complex. Much like dividing gender into "men" and "non-men" doesn't work, dividing attraction into "attracted to men" and "not attracted to men" doesn't really work either. The split attraction model (different romantic and sexual orientations) allows for the possibility of someone being biromantic homosexual or bisexual homoromantic- both bi and a lesbian. There are also forms of alterous attraction- sensual, aesthetic, queerplatonic, etc. Orientation is typically defined around sexual/romantic attraction, so if someone is a lesbian in those attractions but is alterously attracted to men and other genders, they could fall under mspec lesbian. It's also possible to be unsure if you're attracted to men and include yourself with both communities, or feel attraction to men so little the lesbian experience resonates with you, or feel attraction to men but only form relationships with women. Like I said, you really can't divide it into attracted to men or not.

(5) Mspec doesn't necessarily mean attracted to men, either. Polysexuality is being attracted to many but not all genders. So by your definition, non-men attracted to non-men, lesbians can be attracted to all genders that are not men. Which is a lot of genders, if you're not transphobic and think nonbinary is Basically Woman. A woman who loves women and nonbinary people is attracted to multiple genders (mspec) and attracted to non-men (lesbianism), so your own ask already confirmed that this is possible.

(6) It's not lesbophobic. It's just people living their lives and describing themself in the terms they think fit best. No one's saying all lesbians have to be attracted to men. The entire point isn't that it doesn't involve men, the entire point doesn't surround men at all. The entire point is loving women, regardless of the inclusion or lack thereof of other genders. It's much more lesbophobic to force lesbians to talk about men in every aspect of our identity than to let lesbians like men or not like men or just live our lives loving women.

Hope this helps, and taught you something

#mspec lesbian #bi lesbian #pan lesbian #mspec lesbian positivity #queer #lesbian #anon i believe you're coming from a good place but i've gotten a LOT of shit for this before #so if you're still against mspec lesbians go fuck yourself #but i believe you did learn something and you don't have to fuck yourself

[runawaymun]

Going off the question on bisexuality and pansexuality, as a bi person I also share the frustration of feeling marginalized within the queer community. If I’m in a relationship with someone of the opposite gender then people say I’m actually straight but if I was in a relationship with someone of the same gender then people say I’m actually a lesbian. Like, yeah, I hear the whole you’re faking it or it’s just a phase or you’re confused all. the. time. How have you dealt with it if you’ve also experienced this?

I think there just comes a point where you have to say "so, you're like, biphobic?" and move on. The constant feeling of being not queer enough for the queers and not straight enough for the straights-- of knowing that some people will never see you as queer if you pick a partner who is the opposite to you and you wind up het-presenting, or imo worse of picking a partner who's the same gender as you and then everyone going "ohhh I'm so glad to see you finally figured yourself out/stopped lying to yourself" gross gross gross

I know what I am. I know that I find more than one gender attractive. Even if my partner ends up being the same gender as me, that doesn't mean that I don't find people of other genders sexy. They're just not my person. If someone, you know, is coming into the conversation and they genuinely want to try to understand, then I usually try to frame things from their perspective. We don't stop finding other people attractive just because we found our person, you know? My playing field is just wider than theirs might be.

But if someone is being genuinely biphobic you just kind of have to go "ok boomer" and move on in my experience. Some people genuinely can't see past their own nose and that's their problem, not mine. I know what I like. They don't get to define my experience. It's just too bad that their frame of reference is so narrow that they can't imagine being attracted to multiple genders. What is it like in your tiny little brain? Must be so boring in there. 🤷

I just find it so mind boggling that in the year of our lord 2023 queer people are still trying to define other queer people's experiences and dividing over this lol. Nobody's cooler or more queer for being monosexual. I'm not cooler or more queer for being polysexual. We are what we are. I am born bi the same as anyone else is born gay or straight or aro or w/e. The people who get it will get it, the people who genuinely want to try to understand are worth talking to about it (everyone starts somewhere), and the people who refuse to think outside their narrow little echo chamber aren't worth your time. Queer people can be queerphobic. An unfortunate fact of life, but a fact nonetheless. You know who you are and what you want and what you like; other people's opinion of you doesn't matter. You really do just have to go "ok, so you're biphobic?" and move on sometimes.

#bisexual #queer #<3 #out of uniform #rambling here but i hope i'm making sense #i've experienced a lot of biphobia in my life from both queer people and from straight people #it used to bother me #it really doesn't anymore beyond just 'ugh this again?' lol #other people's willful ignorance is not my responsibility #i'm happy to teach ignorant people if they actually want to be taught #but sometimes people just want to be stupid #that's where I go wwjd and the answer is from matthew 10:14 #shake the dust off your feet and walk away #not worth losing sleep over

[roctopussyy]

Hello hello! You can call me Tango!

It/Its, He/His, She/Hers and Flame/Flames pronouns thank you!

About :

I'm a DID Introject of Tango from the Traffic Life series. (Specifically 3rd/Last/Double Life) I'm not the youtuber, and I'm not a roleplayer. If you're not sure what DID is, this carrd is pretty helpful!

The main system blog is @playstation-hydrangea and here's our collective DNI! (If I fuck up and interact with you when I wasn't supposed to, feel free to let me know and I'll unlike/unreblog your post. Thanks!)

I'm a transfem guygirl in a transmasc body and I'm a polysexual lesbian! If you don't like mspec people I'm gonna steal your stuff <3

I enjoy game shows, building, gambling testing the odds, and FIRE!

I try and keep triggers tagged for people with #tw [thing] and tag nsfw posts with #minor dni. Keep yourselves safe out there!

Finally, I'd appreciate it if you just treated me like a normal dude okay? I'm not a blorbo to be fawned over nor am I someone to be scared of. I just wanna reblog cool art and build inspiration!

Some pretty cool people :

My ranching partner Serina! : @canary-ranchers-revenge

My dearest QPP husband Impy : @armor-smithing

My boyfriend, Leggy : @leggy-legundo (Kipper's also there :) )

Dubby and PEEtho : @dubs-step @ethos--slab (Sorry Etho /s)

The Devious Duo Trev and Sev : @parrotsparty @jellie-kitty

My good friend Timebomb : @bad-boys--bread-bridge

My best buddy, main man Waffles! : @pesky-fish

Sugar, the sweetie : @sugarcanepillars

Smore the funny kibby :) : @hermitpoweredwheelchair

And Jello the EPIC : @omega-epic

Divider 1 ♡ Divider 2 ♡ Divider 3

#tangotext #pinned

[colorisbyshe]

Can you explain why you dislike micro-labels and find them Biphobic? I personally don't think that it really matters and would be interested to hear your opinion.

First off, I should be paid things for answering asks like this.

All microlabels do is divide people who previously existed in solidarity with each other.

I'm gonna let you in on the "biromantic polysexual panopticism omniscient" crew's biggest secret, which isn't that they are just biphobic bisexuality, but that ALL of them are in response to the idea that bisexuals are inherently too sexual and too shallow, that they are attracted to multiple genders not due to sincere attraction but simply due to a lack of standards. We're too horny, too stupid, too greedy to actually just stick with the gender we're ACTUALLY attracted to.

Classic biphobia.

It’s not even wrong to be sexual or have “low standards” or just want to fuck or whatever. And yet you’ll cave in to people saying it is just to clear your own ego--you want to separate yourself because you think it’s wrong.

Instead of standing up for bisexuals on the whole, these people choose to throw the rest of us under the bus. "THEY are everything you think they are but not me. I'm biromantic, I don't even feel sexual desire. I'm not horny like THEM. I'm pansexual, I don't even SEE gender! I'm not obsessed with genitals like you transphobic, horny fucks who are so sex driven you can't even see a person for their humanity. I fall in love with HEARTS not GENDER, unlike you shallow people with your low standards."

There is no solidarity, just a desperate tug and pull on the identity, splitting it apart at the seams, to get some scrap of dignity you think can't be found when the identity is kept together.

And you can't even fucking deny that? Why feel the need to clarify all these things if you think they're already included within bisexuality? Why isn't there a "trans inclusive" version of any other labels? Why can gay and lesbian and straight be used for aces but bisexuals can't be asexual? Why do we need to clarify that we "don't fall in love with gender" as if that's how it works for anyone else? As if lesbians' quota for a partner is just "woman" (transphobic definitions may or may not apply)? It certainly fucking isn't.

And like... I'm not even gonna get into how this death by a thousand cuts, none of us have solidarity with each other shit, makes zero sense. Like... do pansxuals need different resources or spaces than bisexuals? No, then why do they need different labels? What's the point? Why separate us on a linguistic level and create enmity based on that if there is no.. actual different needs?

Why demand every person attracted to all genders parse out their exact feelings (are you attracted based on shallow reasons or are you One Of The Good Ones because you: don't feel sexual attraction, don't "see gender," "fall in love with hearts," "see all genders equally") and put them on display? What is the benefit? Do I have to change labels when I have a depressive episode and my libido is dead and MAYBE I experience sexual attraction but I'm too depressed to like... actually feel or recognize it? Am I biromantic until further notice?

Whats the fucking point of it all besides separating us from each other?

Do we need separate labels for bisexuals whose primary point of interest is shared hobbies and bisexuals whose primary point of interest is actually finding someone with complementary but different interests? Different bisexual labels based on love languages (other fucking microlabel obsessed hogwash)? I'm a tits bisexual, are you an ass bisexual? Lets divide up our resources based on that.

I think if you met your partner and naturally fell in love with them, you should haev a different label from someone who met their partner on a dating app. If you met in high school, a different label from those who met in college or grad school.

Why not?

How are any of those less valid than "I like every gender equally" separating us and creating this stupid fucking war that distracts us from the actual shit that matters?

Why are we so obsessed with setting ourselves apart when all we need right now is to come together? Why is your individualism more important than our collective needs?

#bisexuality #micro labels #the way i just did not even have time to get into thow the labels are transphobic and homophobic too #but they are

[jakemorph]

i think a lot of people dont want to admit to just how prevalent the idea is that historical precedent is sacrosanct. like you can see it in gay circles right now we all make fun of tiktok teenagers for thinking pronouns werent invented until 2020 but then in the same breath a kid who wants to call herself “polysexual” is also called wrong because polysexuality doesn’t fit the established Historical Precedent for what can and can’t be “a sexuality” and therefore it and labels like it must be the reason for all the problems in the community today. "microlabelling” gets to be the new boogeyman because giving yourself a label that doesn’t have any Historical Precedent only serves to divide the community but the words that start with L G B and T are fine because they’ve been around for a couple hundred years at most. when does a movement to reconnect with gay history become a history fetish

[animatedglittergraphics-n-more]

bisexual (spectrum) dividers

‹ free to use with credit ›

requested by anon

* best when used on white background

#my asks #anon #dividers request #bisexual spectrum dividers #mine #glitterphoto.net #page dividers #line dividers #dividers #separators #transparent #bisexual #androphilia #gynephilia #polysexual #abrosexual #demiboy #demigirl #genderfluid #genderqueer #bigender #pride #lgbtqia #pride dividers

[sicklyliely]

About Liely ~

╭✧ Name: Liely ┊Age: 16 ┊Gender: Non-Binary ┊Pronouns: They/She/Em ┊Sexuality: Polyamorous, Polysexual, Asexual ┊Triggers: Cockroaches ┊Hobbies: Writing, stargazing, studying, gardening (ish), and reading ┊Likes: Astrology, Roman, Egyptian, and Greek mythology, animals

What Liely Will Do !! :: Fandoms That Liely Can Write For :: - Haikyuu - Danganronpa - Kimetsu no Yaiba / Demon Slayer - Genshin Impact - Boku no Hero Academia / My Hero Academia - Doki Doki Literature Club - Ouran High School Host Club - Yandere Simulator :: - Headcannons - Oneshots / Drabbles - No NSFW --- *Perhaps pre-NSFW or post-NSFW - Fluff / Angst :: Other Stuff :: - Writing Prompts - Reminders - Roblox

DNI !!

Transphobic people

Homophobic people

Ableists

Fatphobic people

Pedophiles

Overly religious people

Racist people

People who self-diagnose

( dividers, credits to @danowh0re )

#sickly liely #intro post #introduction post #intro #introduction #lgbtq #writing #poetry #books & libraries #literature #writers #<3

[rotationalsymmetry]

Re: bi/pan discourse.

This is probably way too much nuance for tumblr, but here goes.

1. People can identify however they want.

2. Having heavily overlapping labels is not inherently bad.

3. As far as I can tell, the pansexual label comes from a good place. A lot of older people using “bisexual” used/use it on the assumption that there are two genders, because practically everyone in western culture assumed two genders. Nonbinary genders being a widespread concept is a very recent thing, in a contemporary Western context. And while bisexual as a term doesn’t have to assume two genders to be a meaningful term, it’s also not bad to have a term that explicitly acknowledges the existence of nonbinary genders.

4. There are also advantages to the term bisexual, including that it’s more widely recognized and most of the activism specifically for bi (m-spec) people as opposed to queer people as a whole has been done under the bisexual label. And apparently including that some people figure the bisexual label applies to them but pansexual doesn’t, for various reasons.

5. Ok. In the context of all the preceding: I think the discourse that arose after “pansexuality” showed up has been overall harmful to (bisexuals/pansexuals/people who don’t like labels but could use one of those if they wanted to/m-spec people.) And yeah, I got the infographic that people have used the term for decades, but I hadn’t heard it until about 10 years ago so I think it didn’t have mainstream usage even within the queer community until around then. That doesn’t mean it’s the fault of people who like the label or that people shouldn’t use it, in fact, I think that to get over the harm the discourse has caused the community it is absolutely essential to not blame other m-spec people for the harm or police their language. I do suspect a lot of this has come from non-m-spec people, either motivated by queerphobia and hoping to divide the queer community, and/or from terfs hoping to divide the community for somewhat different reasons.

6. The retcon of “pansexuality means attraction regardless of gender and bisexuality means attraction to two or more genders but in different ways” is utterly bullshit. The way bisexuals have been using the term for decades is not wrong, and plenty of bisexuals describe their orientation as being regardless of gender. It is fine for anyone individually to say “I identify as x because blah blah blah” but it is essential to understand those definitions are not universally agreed on.

7. In practice a lot of people use multiple labels, and switch depending on context and what the people they’re talking to already know or what their biases are or phases of the moon or whatever. Which is completely fine. “Bi” is fine, “pan” is fine, “queer” is fine, evasive shrugs or hand wiggles are fine, letting people make their own damn assumptions is fine, I don’t get the purpose of polysexual or omnisexual and also in my nonmonogamous circles polysexual has a completely different meaning. But, it’s fine to use those terms. Just cuz I don’t understand them doesn’t mean anything, you know?

[lgbtq-aestheticss]

More pride dividers! Part one

#lgbtq+ #lgbt #lgbtq #pride #aesthetic #lgbt dividers #pride dividers #dividers #pansexual #polysexual #girlflux #boyflux #transfem #transmasc #bigender #librafeminine #libramasculine #libramasc #librafem #transgender #trans

[galaxytale]

also my favorite part of “dont group us w our oppressors” discourse was that most of the ppl who said that were usually white like.

buddy ur as white as i am. bad news: ur already in a group with some of ur own opressors. dont like that? then do what u can to LEARN and BE BETTER and use the priviledge u have.

stop being afraid to accept ur own responsibility and ur ability to hurt other ppl unknowingly and unintentionally.

#chrono speaks #depending on how u divide the community u will ALWAYS have someone grouped with their oppressors #white and poc; cis and trans; str8 and gay #monosexual and polysexual; allosexual and asexul #alloromantic and aromantic #etc etc etc