Tumgik
#Dark!Dany
bi-alinaoretsev · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
@pscentral​​ event 20: antagonists ↳ Daenerys Targaryen "Everywhere she goes evil men die and we cheer her for it and she grows more powerful and more sure that she is good and right. She believes her destiny is to build a better world for everyone. She believed that, she truly believed it. Wouldn't you kill whoever stood between you and paradise?"
197 notes · View notes
aegor-bamfsteel · 7 months
Note
It may be a HC that will never be confirmed, but I believe that Daenerys's dragon eggs hatched because she sacrificed a live woman on a pyre, who happened to be a slave for "conquest" (like the ones her valyrian ancestors killed by thousands) just as I believe that dragon fetuses are because of experiments to create chimeras. Maybe that's how dragonbind works, giving a life in exchange for claiming a dragon
I think you’re right that dragon binding/hatching/chimeras involve blood sacrifice; a lot of what we know of ASOIAF magic involves it (not just dragons; but the Red priests use blood to create winds and curses; it seems certain people can see the future after ingesting blood; the Children of the Forest allegedly created the Neck and the Broken Arm using a mass blood sacrifice). It’s GRRM’s fantasy way of exploring how certain people gained fantastic power by exploiting, dehumanizing and killing others. Jorah finding Dæny “surrounded by blackened logs and bits of glowing ember and the burnt bones of man and woman and stallion” seems compelling that given dragons are “fire made flesh” all 3 were used to hatch them (and maybe Dány, she’s surrounded by an eggshell of dying fire and dead flesh herself). Then there’s the dragonhorn that needs to be claimed with blood and seems to burn whoever blows it (if what Moqorro is saying is true), which could be evidence that another “fire and flesh” ritual involving human sacrifice is needed to control dragons just as it is to hatch them. Mirri mocked Dány killing the horse for Drogo, saying “by itself the blood means nothing”, was defiant when Dàny had her bound to the pyre and dumping oil on her like kindling, but once Dàny had her bound to the pyre and said “it is not your screams I want, only your life. I remember what you told me. Only death can pay for life” she became afraid. It’s the intentional, agonizing ritual immolation of another person that can bring forth dragons. This kind of mentality is based on dehumanizing others (literally killing them and using their body/spirit to make a weapon) for power, which, you’re right, does overlap with slavery and conquest.
109 notes · View notes
musical-chick-13 · 2 years
Text
I think people who pick one character from AsoIaF/GoT to be The Protagonist are missing the point, because pretty much all of the characters think THEY are The Protagonist™ and that’s ultimately what screws them over.
(I also want to preface this by saying that that’s the reason I find these characters so interesting, and that this is not meant to insult any of them. I LOVE this story, and this is one of the many reasons why.)
Cersei thinks she’s the Villain Protagonist™ of a gritty drama. Even if it doesn’t make sense for things to work out for her, she assumes they will, seeing everyone around her as faceless idiots serving her narrative. Anyone and everyone will betray her because that’s what always happens in stories like this, so she won’t give them a chance to ever get there. People will move the way she assumes they will; everyone is predictable and stupid and shallow and cowardly. And as such, no one possesses the necessary skills to take her down. If she’s more ruthless and ambitious and paranoid than everyone else, she’ll get what she wants. But that’s not how life actually works, so all she does is alienate those around her, even necessary allies. People aren’t always predictable, not all of them are compliant or subservient or easily-frightened or incompetent. And if you prioritize ruthlessness and distrust, the people who aren’t those things aren’t going to see any reason to keep you around or give you aid.
Jaime thinks he’s a Cynical Misunderstood Antihero. He doesn’t need to work on bettering himself or de-internalizing his violent impulses, because he’s not the problem, it’s society, it’s people’s incorrect assessment of him. Look, he made a friend in Brienne, that must mean he’s not all bad, right? He thinks this story ends in a Public Image Rehabilitation, but he still conflates love with violence, and he still has a fucked up relationship with consent, he’s arrogant to a fault, he still insults Brienne (and just about everyone else) when the opportunity presents itself, and he never bothers trying to change that. And it’s all of this that prevents him from every truly becoming a good person. He’s so mired in this idea of being misunderstood that he doesn’t make a concerted effort to prove that he actually is. People think he’s an oath-breaker, that he has too big of an ego, that he doesn’t care about the people he swore to protect, and he thinks that simply going, “Yeah, but they don’t have the whole picture” is enough in and of itself to prove them wrong because, in a lot of stories, it is. But all his behavior does is cement his reputation as these things.
Dany thinks she’s The Chosen One, which means whatever she does is automatically the right decision. People will accept her rule because it’s hers, she deserves it, it’s morally right. All of her enemies are blanketedly wrong on all accounts in all cases. Her goals supersede anyone else’s because those goals are the way to a Happy Ending, and she doesn’t consider that other people might not see it that way. Many people’s gripes with her stem from gross places like misogyny or wanting to continue keeping slaves, but she forgets to acknowledge that some people’s issues with her might actually be valid. And that The Chosen One is actually a terrifying idea to people outside that person’s immediate personal context. She has three sentient WMDs, essentially. And if she thinks that using them is always morally correct, that the fallout from doing so can’t possibly be a problem because she’s using them and it’s for a noble cause, you end up with what happened in Astapor; and you end up with Drogon killing a child in Mereen and, eventually, her demise at the end of the show.
Sansa starts out thinking she’s an Optimistic Child Hero in a fairytale. This leads to her being held captive at court (she trusted that the authority figures were benevolent), writing a letter to her family that almost comes back to bite her to a deadly degree once her sister finds out in the show (she thought she could solve everything herself via a peaceful resolution), and to her trusting a complete monster of a boy until it’s too late (she thought he was Prince Charming). She thinks that being the Soft, Beautiful Heroine means people will love her and everything will end nicely and neatly, but sometimes instead of “love”, people just take advantage of you. And sometimes their reaction to your beauty isn’t innocent appreciation-sometimes you end up with Littlefinger. (Or Tyrion or The Hound who...let’s just leave it at “they have their own issues,” especially book-wise.) This morphs into assuming that a fairytale-esque betrayal will befall her with every new person she meets. It’s why she defends Petyr after his murder of Lysa, and it’s why she doesn’t leave with Brienne; if she’s going to be betrayed anyway, she might as well at least stick with a villain she understands.
Ned thinks he’s the Noble Hero in a typical fantasy series. He doesn’t consider everyone else’s capacity for cruelty or the idea that honor alone might not be enough. Sometimes there are no perfect choices, sometimes mercy does not give you the end goal you envisioned, and sometimes you can try your best and that can all be undone by one impulsive, unforeseeable action. You can’t honor your way out of ruthless political conflict.
Robb thinks he’s a Romantic War Hero, and thus everything will magically work out for him. His ideals and his marriage will conquer everything. But he broke a marriage promise to a powerful family, and that has consequences. The world won’t bend to his will, not even if he is doing the right thing or has noble goals, not even if he’s had war success, not even if the people at home love him, not even if he’s in love (show) or doing the most honorable thing he can (books). He thinks that being the hero means he can make it through Westeros without having to play the game, and he gets murdered for it.
Theon thinks he’s an Underdog Outcast Hero. He’ll come up from behind with an unsuspecting War Victory, and that will earn him respect, the love of his family, and a legacy he can look back on with pride. And that mindset leads him to murder two children, to drive away any allies and good grace he had at Winterfell, and the reason that the War Victory he imagined was so unexpected is because it’s completely untenable. He gets more and more desperate and it’s increasingly harder and harder to hold onto the control he’s managed to obtain. He has reasons for wanting this that make sense, and he’s been dealt a pretty bad hand in life, and he thinks that’s and his determination to overcome his personal identity struggles is enough to not only justify his actions, but ensure that those actions will be successful. And then his plan blows up in his face, he assumes he’s been miraculously saved (probably still having something to do with seeing himself as The Unexpected Hero), and ends up at Ramsay’s mercy.
Arya thinks she’s a Badass Heroine in the making, a skilled swordslady and Rebellious Princess who’s destined for more than this stuffy life of politics and dresses and formalities. But rebelling isn’t always enough. It doesn’t help with the Mycah situation, and she still needs to rely on others’ help in getting out of the city after Ned is executed. When she does try to embrace the “fully self-sufficient sword lady” idea while with the Faceless Men in Braavos, she is told to functionally discard her identity completely. She does an unauthorized kill because she, not her assassin-persona-in-training, wants to (though the victim’s identity differs in books and show), which leads to her being temporarily blinded and prevented from going on assassination missions, and outright forced to beg for food in the show. In the show, after being reinstated as an apprentice, she is tasked with killing an innocent person, refuses (rebels), and realizes that this life is one she can’t handle. She goes home, and her heading straight for her sword is one of the things that almost completely ruins her relationship with Sansa. In the upcoming Winds of Winter release, her chapter excerpt has her prioritizing revenge over her apprentice duties, and she remarks that her new identity is ruined with this rebellious action. When you rebel, there are consequences-this doesn’t change just because your intentions are good or because you are or think you are important.
Jon thinks, similarly to Ned, that he’s The Good Guy, that doing the right thing, that following The Code is paramount. He thinks that, because he’s The Good Guy, that doing the right thing with the maximum amount of good for everyone will always be a workable option, and that the heroic option will always yield the best result. This is why he thinks proclaiming his love to Ygritte in the show will end well (because love is good and conquers everything) and is, instead, shot by her several times. It’s why he doesn’t foresee a mutiny in either medium, which leads to his (temporary) death. (Let’s be real, he’s getting resurrected in the books, too, this is the one thing I’m sure of.) Because yes, everything is tense and he’s on bad terms with the Watch, but surely they wouldn’t go that far. It’s rough going, and he has to juggle the needs of several widely different groups of people, but he’s doing the right thing and that will win out; his conviction will protect him, at least for the time being while he tries to manage the bigger threat of the White Walkers. The real fight is with them, the mysterious overarching enemy, not within his own ranks. This is a story where everyone puts aside their differences to fight a greater threat-except for the times when it isn’t.
Even Catelyn isn’t immune, as she assumes that Petyr, since he’s her childhood friend, is invested in solving the mystery of what happened to Bran when he tells her the dagger used in the attack was Tyrion’s. Lysa is her sister, she can’t possibly be suspicious. She thinks the Lannisters are evil, her instincts tell her that they were behind everything, she’s the Protective Mother Heroine, so she must be right. But although she is to a certain extent correct, that’s not the complete picture. And this slightly-misplaced confidence leads her to arrest Tyrion, the retaliation of which is Tywin siccing his forces on her homeland, one of the major first steps in the upcoming political war. Then, her continued focus on saving her children-something that must take precedence because they are her children, and this is her story-leads her to taking Walder Frey’s supposed offer of a fix-it solution for Robb breaking his marital pledge at face value, despite House Frey’s reputation, and despite this neat resolution seeming far too good to be true. She’s so focused on the Lannisters-the Obvious Endgame Enemy-that she doesn’t consider the possibility of betrayal from the Freys. She thinks that the world is giving her a break-because she is so desperately looking for one, because she deserves one, because her family deserves one, and those are reasons enough for her to have one-that she doesn’t even bother to re-evaluate the situation until it’s too late.
Melisandre thinks she’s a Religious Hero, but she ends up burning a child alive and alienating one of her few remaining allies in the process (and Davos was barely an ally to begin with). She thinks she’s Doing What Needs To Be Done to serve her savior, but it hurts Stannis more than it helps him, and he just ends up being murdered by Brienne. This is obviously in the show only (at least at this point), and I don’t know if Stannis is going to burn Shireen in the books or not. Stannis thinks he’s the Lawful Hero, and thus, because according to law he’s the Rightful Ruler, anything he does is automatically excusable; he’s just righting a wrong. And in the process, he imprisons his closest friend, has a hand in murdering his brother (when kinslaying is one of the most universally hated breaches of conduct in this fictional universe), allies with a dangerous woman that much of his own court despises, and, in the show, murders his only child and drives away most of the rest of his remaining team.
They all think that, since they are the main characters of their own stories, that they’re the main character of the larger, overarching narrative. That having understandable reasons or sympathetic qualities or even just having a clear goal that they desperately want, that’s enough to cement their importance. And they think that means that they’re justified in everything they do, that everything will work out for them, that the consequences will be lesser for them than for others, because that’s what it’s like to be the main character. The whole point is that there is not A Protagonist™ and that maybe we should examine why a story needs A Protagonist™ in the first place and what that narrative tradition tells us. When GRRM said he turned down adaptation offers because they only wanted to focus on Jon and Dany, this is why.
#asoiaf#got#asoiaf meta#got meta#most of this is directly related to everyone deconstructing the archetypes they would represent in other stories#so I'm not sure how much of this is just 'deconstructing tropes' and how much of it is 'Main Character Perception Syndrome'#also obviously this isn't every character I ran out of room and honestly some of them like davos and brienne and maybe even loras#probably don't think they're The Main Character which there's a whole other essay in there about how they're The Good People#I personally think Bran never gave off 'I think I'm the main character' energy but I know haters will disagree with me on that#like...Idk his sense of self-worth kind of went away and he spent a bunch of time trying to get it back and figure out how to get by#in a society that now thought he was worthless. and how to get enjoyment out of life when his goals were no longer reachable#it read less as 'I think I'm more Important™' and more 'I'm just trying to survive man' but also I love bran I might be a little biased lmao#cersei lannister#jaime lannister#dark!dany#sansa stark#arya stark#theon greyjoy#jon snow#catelyn stark#robb stark#ned stark#melisandre#stannis baratheon#I take my life into my own hands by putting actual names in the tags but I talk about these characters and I don't know how else to tag#this to ensure people who don't want to see it won't have to see it#also for anyone wondering where tyrion is on this list: I was too tired to delve into this phenomenon regarding him because it is ESPECIALLY#prominent regarding him. and this post was already so long and talking about tyrion in this context probably would've made it TWICE as long#there genuinely isn't enough space in here to include him but know that I'm counting him too. most definitely#behold! a creation!
597 notes · View notes
This whole sequence fascinates me:
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Jon melts from the darkness and is making his walk to go confront Dany.
He happens upon a mound of ashes and debris which Drogon happens to be under. We know Drogon is an extension of Dany so the fact that he's just chilling underneath all of this should alert people to how blase Dany actually is about what she's just done, and no one should be surprised at her reaction when Jon confronts her on how many people (including innocent children) she just burned alive.
This is the world she wanted. She wanted to destroy the wheel so she could be on top forevermore. She didn't even want Targaryen as a spoke left.
20 notes · View notes
saltywinteradult · 2 years
Note
Hi! I’m new to your page, nice to meet you! :) I must ask, because I’m so curious! Was there ever a time where you did like Dany at all and really enjoyed her character or did your hate for her become more clear when D&D rushed her character development and she pretty much became mad in the process? I hope you enjoy HOTD a ton watching things unfold. :) I am looking forward to it! I definitely enjoy the history of the Targs and how their empire turned into ash. Anyways, have an incredible day! :)
Oh dear, I started drafting an answer to this and then completely forgot it! I suppose a very, very, very late answer is better than none at all...?
Anyway, how nice of you to give me an excuse to ramble about my complicated relationship with Dany for a while. I apologise, this got really long.
The short answer is yes, I was one hundred percent aboard the Dany hype train at one point, but that changed long before the show's writing really started going downhill. I actually still enjoy her character, but I went from liking her as a hero to appreciating her as a villain.
I think a lot of people forget that the show really whitewashed Dany's character from the very beginning in order to sell her as a Strong Female Character™ for feminism points. The sack of Astapor is probably the best example of this; Dany murders a lot of people (even if they're bad people) and the books depict how Astapor descends into chaos with many more dying as a direct result of her actions. Those consequences are largely glossed over in the show and the cinematic language of that scene frames it as a triumphant moment.
The closest thing to a watershed moment was the scene in season 4 where Hizdahr confronts Dany about her crucifying his father, despite him having spoken out against the very crime he was being punished for, the crucifixion of Meereenese children. I hadn't yet read the books at this point and I remember watching that scene and going "oh, shit. Did she not look into whether the people she punished were the ones who actually did it?" I'd assumed she must have done that, because after all, that's what a hero would do, and Dany was supposed to be a hero. Right?
I read the books between seasons 4 and 5 and was surprised by how much worse Dany comes off there. The books really are a lot more concerned with the messy reality of politics than the show ever was and that difference does not work in Dany's favour. Reading about her profiting from slavery despite selling herself as an abolitionist and utterly failing to replace the slave trade with a reliable alternative, I became more and more convinced that Dany was not a good ruler, or a hero. Her "dragons plant no trees" epiphany at the end of ADWD was what finally convinced me that she was a villain in the making - and a brilliantly written one at that. She may be one of the most powerful people in the world who controls what are essentially nukes, but she is also a child. Of course that's not going to end well. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. What an amazing character arc.
And that would have been that, if the show hadn't kept trying to sell Dany as a feminist hero long, long past the point where it should have started building up to her inevitable fall from grace. I kept expecting the show to stop whitewashing her and that moment just never seemed to come. On the contrary, the show reveled in Dany's violence and kept framing it as justified.
Worse, the way some - some - of Dany's stans behave started really getting under my skin. It's fine to interpret her character differently and to want a different ending for her in the books. She is after all a sympathetic character and the show kept framing her as a hero right up until the end, which is why I do have some sympathy for the people who didn't see it coming. At this point I wouldn't even really care that many of Dany's fans to this day still deny that she has ever done anything wrong, if it weren't for the fact that some of them - again, some - go out of their way to harass and pick fights with the people who criticise Dany. The times that people have come into the notes of my (correctly tagged, mind you) Dany-critical posts to aggressively attack my opinion in really nasty ways are too numerous to count. Respectful disagreement is one thing; attacks and toxicity are quite another.
Again, I promise, I really do understand why some people didn't see her fall from grace coming and felt betrayed by it. But attacking the people who did see it coming and pointed it out is where I draw the line. That is where my sympathy ends.
And unfortunately, my annoyance with the people who behave this way started bleeding into my feelings about Dany herself. I still like her as a wonderfully written villain (in the books, at least) but I am now at a point where I'm really annoyed by her, because I've seen so, so many people defend even her most indefensible actions and attack those who think differently. Again, I thought she was going to go dark years before she actually did. Plenty of people predicted it. She's always been a villain. A sympathetic and fascinating villain, but a villain nonetheless.
48 notes · View notes
lemonhemlock · 1 year
Note
If you believe the dark!dany thoery who do you think will end dany? Hills believes it to be arya and she did present a good arguement about it too
I saw her video! She makes a good argument, but I can't say I'm convinced. Arya just doesn't interact in any way with anything Daenerys-related. To me her arc is very much about revenge, the trauma of war, identity and getting back to her family. I don't think she has any business killing anyone important. This plotline of her becoming a ninja assassin that could then dispose of anyone she doesn't like always seemed very deus-ex-machina to me, I mean, talk about being convenient. There's a reason why George imposed a limit on the accessibility of Faceless Men (they're supposed to be SO expensive even kings would have trouble paying the fee) - because it would be extremely silly for them to be running around killing whomever.
And what thematic purpose would it serve for Dany, one of the major characters of the series, to have Arya kill her? Dany doesn't even know or care Arya exists. She may be a fan favourite, but it seems unfair to have one of your most developed characters and prophecy girl be killed by someone random to her. At least Jon Snow killing her makes some thematic sense, he is the secret Targaryen heir to throne and possible love interest, her rival/relative/lover.
I used to think that was going to be her end because of the whole Azor Ahai - Nissa Nissa imagery. The legendary hero tempers his sword* in his wife's heart in order for said sword to acquire magical properties that will help end the Long Night. But then, further east, you have the legend of the Blood Betrayal, where the Bloodstone Emperor slays his sister, the Amethyst Empress and ushers in the Long Night.
So, basically, the same act, the killing of a woman (close to the slayer) is supposed to both bring about AND end the Long Night? Seems like both acts are equally evil to me. And Davos agrees with me, what with his whole debate with Melisandre about sacrificing Edric Storm for "the greater good". So what if Azor Ahai and the Bloodstone Emperor are actually the same mythical figure and not at all heroic? I don't know.
Which is to say that maybe Dany won't die sword-in-heart. Maybe she'll have a moment of clarity where she realizes that Westeros would be a better place without her on the Throne, sacrifices herself against the Others and, in death, is revered as a hero herself.
*Also, we have this mythical sword already and there's no need for it to be tempered; it works just fine. It's probably Dawn. She even gets a close-up when Young!Elrond!Ned goes to tend to Lyanna in the flashbacks.
10 notes · View notes
chena-h · 15 days
Text
You know, drawing the connections between Daenerys' and Anakin's storylines helps to put things into perspective.
0 notes
krossan · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
when you say that to the person that you know won't hesitate
12K notes · View notes
lilianade-comics · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
snippets of post AGIT Cheese Melt because, well, I'm predictable. Also featuring post AGIT Dan because I love him~
5K notes · View notes
demonic0angel · 2 days
Text
Celestial Body AU Outfits (click for clarity)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Like I said, they wouldn't actually wear this in my AU, but I like designing outfits so if they started serving ✨looks✨, then they'd look like this
984 notes · View notes
bi-alinaoretsev · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
@usergif back to cool event: challenge 1 - blending
One day, your great city will return to the dirt as well. At your command? If need be.
184 notes · View notes
aegor-bamfsteel · 2 years
Note
What do you think about Mirri? Do you think her betrayal to Dany was justified? Was she responsible for Rhaego death or it was Dany Targ genes responsible for his monstority?
I think she’s one of GRRM’s best written minor characters, and the situation around her is so fraught with arguments on either side it’s been a subject of debate for at least over a decade. I recommend looking at my Mirri Maz Duur tag; not because I’ve said anything exceptionally novel (nor will I) about her, but because the meta I’ve reblogged on her is some of the best written I’ve seen in fandom. There’s something about her conflict with Dæny that makes people go back to read very carefully, to assess what exactly went down and who is responsible. As for my own opinion, I’ve always been partial to those who rebel against Targaryens (especially if they’re doing it for a good cause, like saving others), so you probably can understand where my answers are going.
Do you think her betrayal of Dæny was justified? I’m unsure how to answer this question, because a betrayal is “breaking or violation of a presumptive contract, trust, or confidence that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals.” A contract implies agreement on both sides for the benefit of both. Dæny first meets Mirri when she is being raped when Drogo’s Khalasar sacks the Lhazareen village, burned homes and temples, raped women, and tortured boys for sport. Between them and Ogo’s khalasar, there may’ve been 10000 captives. The end goal of this sacking was to fund Rhaego’s ascension to the Iron Throne, as the gold from selling them would buy them ships and sailors. So if Dæny had not been khaleesi and carrying Drogo’s child, it’s possible Mirri wouldn’t have been raped, enslaved, forced to march miles with little food, and beaten. It is repeatedly emphasized that Mirri is her slave by Drogo (“You do not ask a slave, you tell her” “these ones belong to my khaleesi), by Dæny (“she would be walking…in the long column of slaves”), by Mirri herself (“You do not ask a slave. You tell her.) As Mirri is Dæny’s slave, she didn’t enter into a relationship with her willingly, nor did she have a choice on whether to trust her. As for the mutual benefit, while the supposed benefit of Mirri’s healing for Dæny is a healthy Drogo and safety delivered Rhaego, thus ensuring the future of a Dothraki invasion of Westeros, the success of her healing for Mirri is…her freedom, which, as already stated, would likely not have been violated had Dæny not been around in the first place (nor, to my understanding, is it Dæny’s ability to give, as personal liberty is an inalienable right). Hardly an equal exchange, as if Mirri had the capability of making such a trade in the first place. By the definition of betrayal—which supposes two people with agency working together for mutual benefit—Mirri did not betray Dæny, since due to her slave status she didn’t have the agency to refuse the relationship, nor was the exchange fair. Dæny decided to trust Mirri because she “saved” her from being raped (though she was still beaten, forced to march, and repeatedly threatened with death, which certainly made her decision to throw her life away easier), and just assumed Mirri would be grateful for her life. That’s hardly Mirri’s fault.
Perhaps a better question would be: Do slaves have the right to rebel against their masters? Some Dæny fans claim that while Mirri was justified killing Drogo, Rhaego was innocent and Dæny had saved her twice, so she was wrong to harm them. So a slave rebelling against a cruel master is justified, but not against a kinder one, and certainly not their child. However, it seems Dæny disagrees:
A boy came, younger than Dæny, slight and scarred, dressed up in a frayed grey tokar trailing silver fringe. His voice broke when he told of how two of his father's household slaves had risen up the night the gate broke. One had slain his father, the other his elder brother. Both had raped his mother before killing her as well. The boy had escaped with no more than the scar upon his face, but one of the murderers was still living in his father's house, and the other had joined the queen's soldiers as one of the Mother's Men. He wanted them both hanged.
I am queen over a city built on dust and death. Dæny had no choice but to deny him. She had declared a blanket pardon for all crimes committed during the sack. Nor would she punish slaves for rising up against their masters. —Dæny I ADWD
All right, so during the sack two slaves rose up against their master, killed him and his wife and oldest son, tried to kill his ~15 year old oldest son scarring him for life, and this teenager wants them hanged. It’s often remarked with the “house was lost when she abandoned it” case that Dæny had resolved her own claim to the Iron Throne as void, but in this case, she says that slaves killing their master’s family but leaving one young member alive to pursue punishment are not to be harmed. By her own logic, Mirri was justified in harming Drogo’s family (from the man to the wife to the children), no matter how Dæny may’ve treated her because she was a slave and thus could use any means necessary to free herself.
Was she responsible for Rhaego’s death? Let’s ask Dæny: “Ser Jorah had killed her son, Dany knew. He had done what he did for love and loyalty, yet he had carried her into a place no living man should go and fed her baby to the darkness. He knew it too…” —AGOT Dæny IX. This wouldn’t be the first time Mirri gave medical advice, she was ignored, things got worse, and she was blamed for what went wrong by the people who didn’t listen to her. She told Drogo to keep the firepod/sting-me-not poultice on for 10 days and say special prayers, he tore it off before then because it itched, his conditioned worsened so he couldn’t be saved through usual medical means, Mirri gets beaten for making the poultice. Mirri warned Dæny that no living person could enter that tent once she was doing her spells, but then Jorah carries Dæny in, and it seems babies are particularly vulnerable to shadow magic, so Rhaego dies, but then Mirri gets blamed for it. When Dæny accuses Mirri of killing her son, she doesn’t deny it, but nor does she confirm it, just saying she prevented future harm. She knew from the repeated beatings and death threats that she was a dead woman once she failed to bring back Drogo (though she’d still have a miserable life no matter what happened) and maybe mocking Dæny would give her a quick death done in anger rather than slow torture like that of the wineseller. Tbh I can’t trust what we know from prior Targaryen stillbirths (Maegor‘s wives and Visenya II having defects, including wings and a tail), as it’s possible some sorcery was involved, but I don’t think we need to. Mirri said don’t go in the tent because death is there, Jorah brings Dæny in when she goes into labor, and all three end up harmed by whatever was in there. The situation is ambiguous, but there’s enough evidence to claim that Mirri didn’t intentionally kill Rhaego, but went along with it because she had nothing to lose.
I can’t condemn Mirri for rebelling against her captors, staying defiant to the end. One of them just happened to be the protagonist of the story, so she gets considered more of a villain than I think she deserves.
210 notes · View notes
daisyjoyflower · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
2K notes · View notes
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it: always look to the parallels. They're there for a reason.
They always show what the actual big picture was/is. Because they're laced into the framework of the story.
68 notes · View notes
bet-on-me-13 · 4 months
Text
Ellie is technically Dan's older sister
So, because Dan is now inhabiting a Cloned Body, that means that he is technically now Danny and Ellie's Sibling.
And technically, the Clone was created and released after Ellie was, long after.
Meaning, Dan isn't the Grumpy Older Sibling. He's the Grouchy Baby Sibling.
Dan is the Youngest!
Imagine this in a typical Runaway AU, where the Batfam encounters this trio of Siblings. 2 of them are Teenage Boys who look almost identical, the other is a Girl who looks about 2 years Younger than them.
And then they introduce themselves like this...
Ellie: And this is our baby brother Dan!
Dan: I am literally 10 years older than you! I look the same age as Danny!
Danny: Really? Cause your DNA says you were born only 6 months ago, and Ellie is 12 months old, and I'm 15 years old, so who's really the baby here?
Dan: SHE IS! I'm the Oldest! I'm not a Baby!!!
Ellie: Sorry about him, he gets cranky when he doesn't get his nap :D
Dan: *sounds of incomprehensible rage*
Danny: Aw, he's having a little tantrum.
2K notes · View notes
sharyrazade · 2 years
Text
It’s probably just a formality at this point, but-
I am this close to writing into my 3H fics something about Emperor Bill’s “prophetic dream” about Fodlan needing to be united to be strong enough to survive return of the mole people and naming it something like “The Emblem of Three Houses.”
Again, it’s probably just a formality seeing the fact that:
- It’s me
- His most (in)famous descendant and who she is literally to begin with
- I already wrote her two elder brothers as literally Rhaegar and Viserys in all but name
- My narration of the War of the Eagle and Lion tells it as an uprising against literally Aerys II in all but name
1 note · View note