Tumgik
#We Broke the Rules
brother-emperors · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
CARRION EATER
this is some kind of standalone idea. the original version was much more goofy, crassus was going to cover up pompey's mouth and say, 'no, no. he's got a point. let him speak,' and then pompey was going to bite his hand and say, 'you're not even supposed to BE here.'
then I read a review about a staging of julius caesar that sounded like it got REALLY mean (because it involved improv since it seemed like the intention was supposed to be interactive with the audience) and decided to add some teeth into it.
(also yes, I broke the 180 rule. it’s fine. usually I try to include panels that show characters walking around when I do that, but this comic was a standalone, so instead pretend that I’m spinning the theoretical cameraman around on an office chair or something. or that the camera is a ghost.)
also because titling something Carrion Eater and then NOT having it get a little mean and nasty in the dialogue seemed. like a waste.
eventually, I'll figure out a design for lucullus that I like, I keep wanting to draw other characters when I draw him, so he might need a new hairstyle.
ONWARDS! this is playing off of this scene
To this Lucullus retorted that Pompey was going forth to fight an image and shadow of war, following his custom of alighting, like a lazy carrion-bird, on bodies that others had killed, and tearing to pieces the scattered remnants of wars. For it was in this way that he had appropriated to himself the victories over Sertorius, Lepidus, and the followers of Spartacus, although they had actually been won by Metellus, Catulus, and Crassus. Therefore it was no wonder that he was trying to usurp the glory of the Pontic and Armenian wars, a man who contrived to thrust himself in some way or other into the honour of a triumph for defeating runaway slaves.
Plutarch, Pompey 31
the romans are fightingggggg 🍿🍿🍿
finally, the painting panel is taken from Giovanni Battista Tiepolo's The Triumph of Marius (through the Met's Open Access/Public Domain use policy etc)
bsky ⭐ pixiv ⭐ pillowfort ⭐ cohost
214 notes · View notes
stergeon · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
"I was laughing but at the same time I really wanted to give El a hug, I felt so bad for her"
Edelgard: Thank you for your concern but I am quite alright now.
Um, what's going on with this?
Byleth: Hey, I'm not complaining. Ever since we got together my squat game has been insane. My ass has never looked so good.
97 notes · View notes
Text
I really don’t think we should be treating morality as a linear thing in ASOIAF because what often happens is that we start to stray from the actual conversations that we need to be having regarding the depths of making a moral choice and even the circumstances involved. To try and blankly paint any one character as the “most morally good” isn’t really taking us anywhere. And it certainly isn’t helpful when people in this fandom want to try and prove that characters are “grey” but not moral (what does that even mean??) because they did one “bad” thing. If ASOIAF stans were to have their way, then:
Jon is not a morally good person because he threatened Gilly
Dany cannot be considered to be compassionate because she sanctioned torture against the wine seller’s daughters
Arya cant be good because she has killed people
and so on, and so on….
But this is such a draining, and oft times frustrating, conversation to have because you see just how shallow the above listed examples are? Readers are listing only singular instances across a narrative that spans thousand and thousands of pages, and there’s absolutely no context involved. Why did Jon threaten Gilly? Why did Dany resort to torture and at one point did she do it? Who did Arya kill and why? And why do those singular instances negate everything else in their arcs?
What usually happens when we have the 12847647282th unnecessary conversation about who is the “most good” character in ASOIAF is that we start getting blanket statements with no elaboration. And the only people ever considered are Ned, Brienne, and Davos, and sometimes the children like Shireen or Tommen. Mind you, Ned and Davos are not perfect or without their own faults either; much has been said about Ned’s abilities as a father and it’s implied that Davos was not entirely faithful to his wife. And based on her current arc, Brienne will surely have to make morally tough choices regarding oaths and knightly honor. Plus theres the irony of including literal children when they have not been put in situations where they actually have to make morally difficult choices and live with the consequences.
ASOIAF shows us that people who are capable of incredible kindness and compassion are also capable of doing unpleasant things.
Jon threatened Gilly….because he was trying to save another child whom he believed to be at risk of human sacrifice(!!) and was stuck between a rock and a hard place. But why does that singular instance negate the fact that his arc has been about him standing up for the “lesser than”? Why does that negate the fact that he stood up for Sam against a superior when there was nothing to gain for him? Why does it negate the fact that he went out of his way to equip Arya in a way that society would have deemed inappropriate? Why does it negate the fact that he dedicated the entirety of his time as Lord Commander to fight an institution that had upheld racism/xenophobia for millennia? Why should we filter out all those moments of kindness, compassion, and deep empathy that Jon has even without him thinking?
Dany sanctioned torture….but she was trying to solve the murder of an innocent victim AND this brought her no joy. But why does that negate the fact that when she gained unimaginable power, she could’ve high tailed to Westeros to use it to her benefit and become queen, but instead chose to stay in Essos where she has no personal responsibility just so she could fight the institutional evil that is slavery? Why does it negate Dany who went to personally treat plague victims at great risk to herself?
Arya has killed some….but it’s in self defense or in defense of others who are disenfranchised. But why does this negate that she is one of the few people in the series how goes out of her way to show kindness and friendship to those who are not as economically or politically advantaged as she is (e.g., Mycah)? Why does it negate that she took fellow slaves under her protection when she herself had little power to fight for her own survival at Harrenhall? Why does it negate that when she saw those caged soldiers whom she was angry with for their actions, instead of leaving them to die instead offered them the only kindness she could at the moment: a drink of water?
Trying to have arguments about morality but stripping everything down to ‘x character did y bad thing (regardless of context) and that’s why they can’t be good’ is, to be blunt, ridiculous. And it isn’t a particularly interesting way to engage with the text. Character journeys, especially well written ones, are rarely ever in a straight line. There’s amazing highs and terrible lows. GRRM gives us so many characters like Jon, Dany, Arya, Sansa, Ned, etc. who even in their lows, have gleams of compassion and exceptional kindness. It doesn’t do anyone any good to filter those moments out to make the books more digestible; and I’m being a little generous here, because so many readers have a very shallow level of engagement with the series and it shows in conversation. And we also shouldn’t pit these characters unfairly against those who have never been in similarly difficult situations that required them to make hard choices. Because when we do, we start to completely miss the point all together.
96 notes · View notes
12am-motivation · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
THEY LOOKING FINEEE
260 notes · View notes
minzart · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
The hand crushing was amazingly unnecessary give me more of the drama-
53 notes · View notes
thevagabondexpress · 8 months
Text
listen. guys.
the answer is not to make ty taller than kit. it's to show that short and noticeably autistic people can be badasses and intimidating and sex gods too.
the answer is not to make ty taller than kit. it's to let ty be a gothic horror cryptid ninja who is very aware that his looks and his neurodivergence are things that get you infantilized because it's something he's experienced, people keep treating him like that, and so he claws back every small bit of control, of power, of ability to intimidate that he can in any way that he can whenever and wherever he can.
the answer is not to remove ways that ty can be infantilized. it's to have the people around him infantilize him and then let him cathartically take down everyone who approaches him with that mindset until nobody dares call him adorable or try ruffling his hair again. to make ty a study in how when you think someone's cute when they're spitting mad sometimes you become a lesson for anyone else who thinks they can get away with doing the same. to make him a representation of how hard it is to escape infantilization and a name to look up to for everyone trying to do it because somehow he did (and he did it with no help from his boyfriend, either).
and kit, poor kit, beloved big brother, personification of summer, tall sun-smiling goofball in a secondhand jacket, sure that he is more well-adjusted than he actually is, has no idea what is coming for him. not. at. all.
34 notes · View notes
pastafossa · 1 year
Text
Entirely, absolutely, totally coincidentally, I thought ya’ll might like to get a sneak peak randomly for no reason hear Ciro’s First Five Rules of Criminality
Children are off limits at every level.
Harm to innocent bystanders is forbidden, especially when it comes to those deemed particularly vulnerable or newsworthy: animals, the elderly, women, and children. Carelessness that leads to collateral damage will be swiftly punished, and intentional harm will earn you a death sentence.
The majority of criminal activities must be pre-approved. Some, like SA and animal cruelty, are never sanctioned and carry a death sentence if the violator is caught. Other crimes like robbery, murder, fraud, and selling of stolen merchandise are strictly controlled.  
Respect the communities within which you operate - keep your space clean, provide assistance when needed, and be polite. Those communities are the ones who’ll be left to speak to police long after you’re gone.
Protect your family.
Anyway these totally have no bearing on how Ciro’s going to feel when he opens that door and sees Jane beat to shit, what? That’s ridiculous, I just felt like dropping these.
who put those italics up there pfft
97 notes · View notes
snixx · 3 months
Text
mike wheeler in the fic I'm reading has exactly as much tact as I did in high school. what can I say sometimes you really do have to learn the hard way that you do not immediately ask your best friend who is also your soon-to-be ex's sibling "nothing's going to change between us no matter how much your sister and i hypothetically hate each other in the future right?" when you're LITERALLY still in the middle of your very messy breakup and they're furious at you secondhand because of #siblingsolidarity. not to mention he handled the break up itself like an ass like go off thank you author i love it truly the representation for us completely oblivious emotionally challenged idiots we're starved of otherwise NO ONE EVER GETS HOW STUPID WE CAN TRULY BE
10 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 5 months
Text
"In reality Richard III invented a Woodville scare as a screen for his own conspiracy"
-A.J Pollard, "Richard III and the Princes in the Tower"
#lmao#r*chard iii#my post#I think that's true for all usurpations and coups to an extent#but its 10x more applicable and accurate for Richard III#Not only because of the compressed length of time (a mere 3 months as opposed to years of back-and-forth tensions)#but also because ultimately one of the key reasons Richard could do what he did was because he did it from the heart of the political#institution (ie he was an internal threat rather than an external one)#and he was someone who was trusted and loved rather than mistrusted and hated. His betrayal was political but it also had far more personal#ramifications for everyone involved - most people simply did not expect it from him and cooperated with him precisely because of that#which enabled him to seize power before most people even realized what he was doing#And there's the fact that he actually did stage a conspiracy by accusing the Woodvilles of plotting to attack and ambush him#and produced weapons from his own war in Scotland as fake 'proof' - when in fact we know that HE deceived and ambushed THEM#there's also the (propagandic) lie that they usurped him from the position as Lord Protector when they certainly didn't#either Edward IV didn't appoint Richard Lord Protector meaning the Woodvilles denied him nothing#OR the council collectively chose to have a council rule during Edward V's minority rather than a Protector (something they were entirely#within their rights to do both socially and legally)#so claims that they wrongly defied Edward IV's last wishes or broke the law (which Mancini repeats in his account) must be seen as exactly#that - propagandic lies to vilify EW and her family#when in fact Richard was the one plotting a seizure of power - whether it was as Lord Protector or as King#(of course these are just two things - there's a whole laundry list of others)#so this is definitely applicable to him
14 notes · View notes
flappingdragon · 4 months
Text
Are you serious…?
Tumblr media
ARE YOU SERIOUS?!
Tumblr media
Does anyone else see the problem here? 😭
18 notes · View notes
frozen-fountain · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Inktober, Day Twenty-Seven: Beast
8 notes · View notes
3amsnek · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
happy winter solstice!! found the sketch for this guy in the back of my last sketchbook with a note saying to finish him for the solstice so here he is :]
click for better quality
reblogs >> likes!! do not like if you don’t reblog
36 notes · View notes
12am-motivation · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
yandere barb
@lady-navier0357
195 notes · View notes
vadapavani-13 · 10 months
Text
taylor swift wrote long live for the crows change my fucking mind.
16 notes · View notes
cloudberrylane · 1 year
Video
Taskmaster AU (2023): Are you okay?
Task. Protect the popcorn with an impenetrable fort. In 10 minutes, Tom will try to eat the popcorn. You may not move the popcorn. You may not personally attack Tom. The longest uneaten popcorn wins. (Nina’s attempt)
23 notes · View notes
neverfittedin · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
@doubtsndemons asked: 📸 / from troy
Send a 📸 to see 3-5 pictures that my muse has/has taken of your muse(s)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
3 notes · View notes