prefers she/her but doesn't mind being called most pronouns. just don't be a jerk (non-binary). Pansexual/Queer. INFP-T. left libertarian. Hufflepuff. Latina. poc. First generation to be born in America. Tomboyish. 30 years. Giving someone their rights doesn't take yours away. I have terrible memory, so if I forgot something or reblog/like multiple times, please don't take it personal. *Will like and reblog NSFW content*! Blog is completely all over the place. Idk what else to put so...have a good day (or afternoon or night)! ❤❤Header is the pansexual/non-binary combo pride flag from @justlgbtthings
That time of year is coming, and since I haven't seen the annual post yet: Taxes
If you're in the same income bracket as me (and let's be honest, we've been pretty good about chasing away the billionaires), you should NEVER use Turbotax
Turbotax pays a loot of money in lobbying to ensure that your taxes stay complicated, so that you have to use them to file your taxes. The thing is! The IRS offers has a webpage that helps you find a service to do your taxes for free! They aren't allowed to advertise it (Thanks Intuit), but it is the cheat code to make your April 15th so much easier.
Here is the IRS service
I have personally used FreeTaxUSA off of the IRS's recommendation and I highly recommend it.
Remember: Lobbying is Bribery under any other name, and the actions of Turbotax and other corporate lobbyists is contemptible. but at least taxes don't have to suck as much as they want it to
Shipping is fun and all but I swear every single time someone makes a comment, whether as a joke or in a legitimate analysis, about there being "no other explanation" for a pair's interactions, I lose just a bit more of my sanity
Like, no, you guys don't get it. Romance is not about the Amount of devotion, it's about the COLOR. the FLAVOR of it all. a character can be just as devoted to their platonic friend as they are to their romantic partner, and they don't love either of them more, just differently.
But because the majority of people still have it stuck in their minds that romance exists on the highest tier of love, I'm stuck seeing endless takes that boil down to "these two care about each other too much for it to NOT be romantic" as if that's the core determining factor to how literally any of this works
In conclusion: stop telling me that I don't understand the story if I don't interpret the leads as romantic, I am TIRED
"When you want to take their books away, they're children. When you want them to work, they're adults."
"When you want to take their books away, they're children. When you want them to work, they're adults." -/u/xFurorCelticax/ on /r/LateStageCapitalismhttps://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/194g10g/when_you_want_to_take_their_books_away_theyre/
"When you want to take their books away, they're children. When you want them to work, they're adults."
"When you want to take their books away, they're children. When you want them to work, they're adults." -/u/xFurorCelticax/ on /r/LateStageCapitalismhttps://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/194g10g/when_you_want_to_take_their_books_away_theyre/
“It turned out that boys were about as likely as girls to say they’d been victims of some form of dating violence. The pattern was also corroborated by girls’ reports: They commonly admitted to being perpetrators.”
“Overall, almost 11 percent of boys said they’d been physically abused by a dating partner at least three times. That compared with slightly less than 8 percent of girls. And a similar percentage of girls and boys – around 4 percent – said they’d been injured.
When it came to psychological abuse, 29 percent of boys and almost 34 percent of girls said they’d been victimized at least three times. Slightly more than 14 percent of boys and 12 percent of girls said they’d been sexually victimized that many times.”