Cozy Storytelling: Books Aren't for Eating
Cozy Storytelling: Books Aren't for Eating @walkerbooksus
Books Aren’t for Eating, by Carlie Sorosiak/Illustrated by Manu Montoya, (Sept. 2022, Walker Books US), $17.99, ISBN: 9781536214963
Ages 4-7
Bookstore owner Leonard the goat loves losing himself in books and delights in choosing the just-right books for his customers, but the day another goat walks in and starts eating his books, he is beside himself! His wife lovingly reminds Leonard that he…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Holy Feast and Holy Fast, Caroline Walker Bynum
3K notes
·
View notes
Author Talk with Caroline O'Donoghue
Register for this latest #AuthorTalk with #CarolineODonoghue, Presented by the #BronxAntiProm! @walkerbooksus
View On WordPress
1 note
·
View note
I knew as soon as I watched the five minutes of the new show, the 28 year olds on this app who complain about everything would not be satisfied because y’all don’t just think for a moment.
All of you complain to kingdom come about “telling, not showing” but ignore what the show is actually doing. The seven year olds watching this show do not know who the fuck Procrustes is lmaooo. Yeah, the show is just going to tell them. It also just makes sense for Percy to know who he is in the show because Hermes gave them a map (and I can go into why including Hermes last episode was such a good detail but that’s for a different post).
This is the same problem y’all had with Medusa and the Lotus Casino because y’all are, again, not remembering who the show is actually for. For your 8 year old niece who has no knowledge base in Greek mythology because she’s in third grade.
Now, if you guys could actually get that through heads, then you’d actually appreciate what they ARE showing, not telling, which is all the character beats. But, y’all complain about that too because it’s not shoved in your face.
Annabeth is not going to say “I love architecture.” Because that would be telling, not showing. So, they had her rave about the Arch to her friends in the most wondrous tone of voice with her big, bright eyes, giddy with happiness. Because kids can infer from that that she loves architecture.
She’s not going to be like “I love dogs and animals.” Because that would be telling, not showing. So, they have her know how to get him to get him to sleep, and when Percy pulls her up from the cliff edge, she moves past him, with the most dejected and heartbroken face (that y’all don’t notice because I guess you’re too busy seething about why the scene isn’t exactly like how you imagined it when you were 12 years old) and throw the ball to Cerberus AGAIN. And then, just as a little cherry on top, Grover asks where she knows how to do that and she talks about her dad. Because kids can infer that she remembers those tricks because she loved the dog.
And the complaints about Annabeth not having a personality or feelings (????) in the show are so hollow. She literally almost cries OR DOES CRY in every single episode since 3. When Percy says that he could never imagine them being friends. When she’s talking about her family on the train. When she realizes Athena let Echidna into the Arch. I don’t even need to talk about episode 5 because that whole ep was just Annabeth feeling feelings. When she’s talking about May. When Hermes tries to touch her hand. When she’s literally rooted to the ground in the Fields of Asphodel and Grover asks what she has to regret.
Notice how all these complaints are about Annabeth? Yeah, I WONDER WHY. You guys are so transparent.
76 notes
·
View notes
let’s be real, annabeth was doomed from the start
(send me asks! think of these real art posts as ads)
53 notes
·
View notes
I don't know if anyone else feels this way but I think a big reason why I'm so chill about the changes made to the PJO show from the books is because I kind of look at each other as their own seperate canon.
Like, I read a lot of anime and manga, and anime adaptations have a huge habit for changing plot points for various reasons, and as a fan of said anime and manga, I've found that I can enjoy both versions of the same story even with the differences when I look at them as their own universe or canon. That's not to say I don't want them to be faithful or true to the source material, but if a scene or situation plays out differently for a logical or entertaining reason, than I can still appreciate that deviation from the manga even if I still like the other original version of that part more. And I can even like the reversal way if I feel an anime does something better than even the manga. But if I want to, I can look at certain moments as more canon than others because I got 2 different versions of that same scene or moment.
And, I don't know, I kind of apply that reasoning to the PJO series as well, mainly with the books, the show, and even the musical (not the movies put that right back where it came from). So far I'm loving the TV show, and while I miss some of the things they changed (like the pink poodle), this adaptation really is doing a great job with staying true to the heart and spirit of the original book that I personally am not even really bothered by the changes, especially when I remember that the books will always still be there with it's own version, or canon, of events.
Like, I will say 1 thing I adore in the books that isn't really in the show is the fact that a lot of Percy and Annabeth's "rivalry" during TLT has more to do with the rivalry between Poseidon and Athena. I just really like on how this adds a level of "forbidden friendship/love" to their relationship 'cause I personally eat the forbidden relationship trope up, especially when it's done well like with Percabeth.
Yet, even if this isn't really the reason percabeth have beef with each other in the show, I can still appreciate and enjoy that according to the show's canon, they have issues because they genuinely have problems with each other as actual people rather than their parents' rivalry, because at the end of the day, that's the PJO TV show canon, and I can always turn to the books for that version of Percabeth's "rivalry", as that is the PJO book canon.
Same goes for the characters too. I will always have and love my dark haired Percy and blond haired Annabeth in the books, but I can also welcome and love Walker's Percy and Leah's Annabeth from the show. And so far, they along with Aryan are KILLING IT as those characters.
I can love both versions of the characters.
I can love both versions of the same story.
I can look at both versions as they own seperate canon or mix them together if I so wish too (especially since both versions of PJO are written by the same guy)
And that's ok. The adaptation doesn't have to be a complete copy of the books. It doesn't have to have things play out eactly the same way. The characters don't have to look exactly the way they are described as in the books. And that's ok. I will still always have the books to love and appreciate, but I can also start to love and appreciate the new adaptation for it's new spin and twists to the same story that sets it apart as it's own canon while still staying true to the spirit of its predecessor.
Anyway, sorry if I'm not making a lot of sense. I just think the people complaining about the changes in the show are looking at it all the wrong way. The show has it's own canon just as the books have their own canon, or even the musical. At the end of the day, isn't that kind of cool to have different versions of the same story and characters? Doesn't it give you so many more options to look at the story in different ways that you can prefer or choose from? Doesn't it give you new versions of canon that you choose from? And really, as long as the PJO adaptation, or any adaptation for that matter, stays true to the heart and spirit of the original story and characters, do the changes made really matter?
34 notes
·
View notes
hp fans grew up with the movies and came of age alongside their beloved characters and i believe that though alot of pjo book fans can’t experience the show in the same manner (we’re all adults now lol) i think watching the show is healing my inner child, is giving me the same sort giddy glee i got when reading the books and now we get to see our beloved characters grow up which imo is just as beautiful an experience as growing up with them.
48 notes
·
View notes
The original android Human Torch returned to the pages of Marvel comics and joined the West Coast Avengers in issue 50, cover date November, 1989. ("Return of the Hero", West Coast Avengers 50#, Marvel Comic Event)
28 notes
·
View notes
Natsume: You didn't sleep a wink last night. Why not go and grab a few now?
Natori [sparkling]: I'm just fine. It takes more than sleep deprivation to dull my dazzling self, so don't you worry your fussy little head.
Natsume [concerned]: Nonsense like that is exactly what someone suffering from sleep deprivation would say!
Sensei: Oh really? Has he been sleep-deprived every day of his life?
so i've been watching the natsume dub -
31 notes
·
View notes
Leah is my Annabeth and Logan isn't my Percy
12 notes
·
View notes
PJO (lighting thief - sea of monsters. Only ones they had for movies and only lighting thief for TV)
12 notes
·
View notes
You'll always be the only Captain America Steve?
Are you sure about that?
From: Avengers #33
13 notes
·
View notes
5 notes
·
View notes
Book names + authors under the cut
Zhou ZiShu/Wen KeXing- Tian Ye Ke (Faraway Wanderers) by Priest
Alyce/Aurora- Malice by Heather Walker
Shadi/Zoya- The Bone Witch by Rin Chupeco
Ambrose Cusk/Kodiak Celius- The Darkness Outside Us by Eliot Schrefer
35 notes
·
View notes
Marvel Comics - U.S. Agent - Inside Moves! (Issue 2 July 2).
#comics #comicbook #marvelcomics #marvel #comic #collector #collection #comicbookcollection #comicbookcollector #backcover #superhighimpact #gaming #snes #supernintendo #nintendo #videogame #videogames #advertisement #usagent #falcon #wintersoldier #mcu #thefalconandthewintersoldier #captainamerica #steverogers #JohnWalker #comiccollector #comiccollection
14 notes
·
View notes