Tumgik
#Noah's ark
cuties-in-codices · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
noah's ark (with dead bodies floating in the water)
in a book of hours, france, c. 1440–50
source: Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS. Auct. D. inf. 2. 11, fol. 59v
562 notes · View notes
aragarna · 18 days
Text
Tumblr media
Good Omemes: Oy, Shem! - David Tennant as Crowley and Michael Sheen as Aziraphale in Good Omens 1x03.
150 notes · View notes
Text
Pre-Raphaelite Dove Advent Calendar 24
Tumblr media
The Return of the Dove to the Ark, 1851, John Everett Millais
197 notes · View notes
illustratus · 23 days
Text
Tumblr media
Noah's ark on the Mount Ararat by Simon de Myle
146 notes · View notes
humanoidhistory · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
Noah's Ark for the Nuclear Age, January 19, 1961.
91 notes · View notes
moishe-pipick · 28 days
Text
Tumblr media
Hz. Nuh (aws)
58 notes · View notes
madame-helen · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
80 notes · View notes
cognitiveinequality · 2 years
Video
OK but why did NOBODY tell me that Nathan Foad was the genius who created this gem that was all over my twitter feed last year????
[x]
2K notes · View notes
lionofchaeronea · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Animals Entering Noah's Ark, Leandro Bassano (1557-1622)
74 notes · View notes
hometoursandotherstuff · 10 months
Photo
Tumblr media
202 notes · View notes
balkanradfem · 3 months
Text
I was thinking the other day about how often biblical stories imply that any sort of species can be started with just one and one female of the species, and sells this as the correct (maybe only correct) way to start things. Like Adam and Eve, they're supposed to be the starters of humanity, one (presumably young) male and one again, presumably young woman.
It repeats again with Noah's ark, where two animals of each species are collected, one male and one female, so they could all 'start their species anew'. Noah's family also is presumed to be the regular, one male + one woman, enough to re-start the humanity.
I understand that these stories were written to establish and force the idea of nuclear family being necessary, good and the start of everything, and if you don't think further than 'oh yeah one male and one woman are capable of making a baby' and you stop thinking there, you might be sold with these stories. But if you think about it for a second further, the implications of this are absolutely atrocious.
One young male and a young woman, are never accompanied by their parents or their grandparents in the stories. They're purposely isolated from their families, or are presumed to not even have family, which means none of them has any support, anyone to go to for advice or help, nobody to rely on to do the massive amount of labour of having and raising even one child. This is already where it falls apart, two young people do not have the knowledge, experience or wisdom to raise a small child, alone. They need their mothers, they need their grandmothers, they need elders and community in order to be able to function - first of all tell me who is delivering that baby they're having? Where is her midwife? It's never mentioned how she gets through childbirth in those stories, apparently she just 'figures it out', while in reality birth is dangerous, and women need both emotional and physical support during labour. There's nobody in this story who knows how to deliver the child safely, or how to save one or both of them should the things go wrong. They both have a chance of dying and then the species is dead. This is all ignored and pretended not to be an issue.
So next in the story we're led to believe that these two young people have made a (mistake) baby and are raising it alone and this is fine. Even funnier is that they often first have a male baby, as an effort to repopulate their species, I mean yeah thats gonna do you a lot of good for sure. Two young people of the opposite sex, without any elders, community, family or support, have one significant power imbalance - the male will usually be physically more powerful, while the woman will be more intelligent, resourceful, adaptive, thoughtful, resilient, and infinitely more vulnerable during the times of labour. It has been shown again and again, that in these circumstances, males do not find it appropriate to protect and treasure the women, but they use their physical advantage to overpower and control her, and her reproductive abilities. But in the stories this is 'fine' because she should 'listen' to this dumber, bigger, less intelligent, more aggressive, more demanding, more exploitative, more dangerous, less useful creature who is completely parasitic and depending on her kindness, intelligence, ability to make food, reproductive abilities and sense of forgiveness of his crimes towards her, to survive. Women are apparently just supposed to be hosts for parasitic males, while isolated, not given a way to overpower him except poison, which is then again depicted as 'bad' because she should just resign to live in servitude to the creature if she wants to prove that she is 'good'. This is bullshit.
Let's look at the next stage, where even more disasters await us. So they raised their child, or children, who have only had these two people to look up to, so they've likely picked up the patterns of 'male is to be served or violence happens, women need to keep their head down and obey or the violence happens', and now the children are supposed to repopulate the species. With? whom? This concept relies entirely on incest? With children who have been raised on learning the massive power imbalance? We're supposed to have sisters accept sexual slavery from their brothers at this point, if we want to have a species of humans? The bible is promoting this?
The bible at this point realizes they've fucked up and write down 'well the sons just went to the nearest village to find girlfriends' OH YOU NEED A VILLAGE NOW DON'T YOU? Now you remembered that actually no, you will now rebuild a species without just one male and one woman and in fact, villages are necessary, and your story leads straight into incest and sexual slavery of women. Presumably the women in the village have whole families and not just two people put in this unnatural position of parasitism and power imbalance. But we don't know, we're supposed to remember 'one male + one woman is correct and nothing else is okay', when the concept is fucked up from the starts and they eventually cave and introduce a village, but do it casually like it doesn't really matter and the story totally wouldn't end up in forced incestuous pregnancies and making a mess of human gene pool.
It was so important for the bible to establish, and re-establish this concept because that is the only way for males to be able to isolate, use and control young women. The concept where women don't have their own mothers, grandmothers, sisters, aunts, families, friends, and villages to protect them from abuse, that is the only scenario where one male can sit on his butt, call himself the 'provider' and then raise his voice and his hand whenever she doesn't do exactly as he says. It's disgusting, and there's nowhere else this can go except abuse. Males will never be unwilling to use their physical advantage to hurt and control women, and we've watched it for centuries, they were more willing to kill women than to accept that we have the right to vote,, the right to divorce them, the right to abort at will (they're still more willing to kill us than to accept this right). No woman is safe in an union with one male, without her family, friends, and a network of support. To live her entire life normally, she needs to rely on the knowledge, experience and wisdom of her elders, so she wouldn't have to do everything alone, and learn everything alone. Male, in return, usually learns all the tactics of manipulating and isolating a woman and will use those, so she needs to be ready and have strategies to defend herself, to be able to escape if it comes to that.
And sometimes, even when the woman has all the support in the world, the male still ends up killing her, because he gets a chance to do it, and it's always at the distraught and horror of everyone who loved her.
Thinking back, the concept of nuclear family had to be invented because males didn't feel like they were able to control the women enough. They likely needed to establish this because they noticed that women were able to go on uncontrolled, they were too 'free', too supported, too resourceful to just trap and control. They needed to convince women that the right thing to do was be alone with one male person who just happens to be stronger and that in fact, not doing so is dangerous and wrong. The concept of nuclear family put the control right in their hands where they wanted it, and it's still ongoing, and we're sick of it. It's a trap.
If you don't believe these stories have influenced our views, think about how males sometimes dream up concepts where they're the 'only male left on the planet', in company of the woman who they're interested in. They relish in these fantasies because they believe in that scenario, they're entitled to rape her. She isn't entitled to resist because then she's responsible for the downfall of humanity, for not repopulating the species, and they feel that this responsibility has to fall so heavy on the woman's shoulders that she will not possibly try to resist him. Women still do, women say right away that if they were the last one, they'd kill themselves instantly. Because we know and understand there's no repopulating the planet with just male and one female. There's just female sexual slavery and incest.
Possibly even the story of Adam and Eve is just a fantasy concept of one male who looked at a woman who was able to say no to him, and thought 'well, what if we were the only humans existing. How would she be able to refuse me then'. And he realized she couldn't. So he wrote it down and sold it as the ideal utopia created by god himself. And we've all been hearing his fetish fantasy like it's gospel. And then the rest of the story is focused on how wrong Eve is for resisting the rules of the male, and the even more powerful male god, how she'll be punished for eating a piece of fruit. We should have never fallen for it.
77 notes · View notes
karo-li · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
i don't remember exactly now, but after ark arc kanda was looking for allen with lavi or alone, and somehow, i still don't know way~
and holy shit, drawing a piano is HARD
119 notes · View notes
danskjavlarna · 1 month
Photo
Tumblr media
Source details and larger version.
My modest collection of vintage Noah's ark imagery is see-worthy (forgive me).
41 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
For God so loved the world, he drowned them all slowly, one by one, over 40 days, that they could witness each other struggle, suffer and finally succumb to the cold, dark, rising waters, because of how he made them, that he should have something entertaining to watch. Amen.
❤️❤️❤️
113 notes · View notes
illustratus · 23 days
Text
Tumblr media
The Deluge by Francis Danby
76 notes · View notes
anissapierce · 4 months
Text
(im defining gay cult classic as in... Shows especially loved by gay folks even if theyre otherwise popular, or shows about gay ppl that are overlooked but have ppl tht are hardcore fans )
(*i think only gay men in a specific five year age range with specific interests know abt this show)
(**look the amount of gay ppl tht came out as lovers of jackass and how homoerotic it somehow is and what meant a lot to people who watched it when they were younger. Heres an article link)
(yes these are all old bc i think cult classic as a category is harder to define today because of all of the different streamers along with the many different channels )
(*** I dont want my calling this a cult classic could be taken as my underscoring how important this series is. But the unfortunate fact is that it's mostly talked about from gay Black men under a certain age)
Reblog so it gets out of my immediate tumblr circle
44 notes · View notes