Bisan is calling for another global strike!
I saw some posts just outlining Jan 21st, and wanted to clarify that Bisan has called for a full seven days of action.
What a global strike would look like is:
calling in sick to work
purchasing bare essentials ahead of the week so you can observe the general boycott of goods / buying as little as you genuinely can
putting in a concerted effort to elevate Palestinian voices and make it clear that this strike is in support of a permanent ceasefire!
For those who will have to purchase necessary goods during this time, please observe the brands that the BDS movement is asking us to boycott!
♢♢♢
Right now is also a good time to mention some better uses for your money during this week.
Available e-sims in Gaza are running low!!
Mirna El Helbawi and her team are working round the clock to continue to connect Palestinians as Israel does its best to cut them off from the rest of the world.
You can learn how to purchase and send e-sims here, and below you’ll find a list of what is currently needed (the areas in brackets indicate what region you should select to buy e-sims in).
--
CareforGaza is an organisation that does verifiably good work, distributing supplies directly to Palestinian families.
They have a Gofundme set up at the moment, but because of Gofundme’s poor track record regarding refusing to transfer funds to Palestinians, I’d recommend continuing to donate directly to their PayPal here.
Good luck to all of you. Don't turn away from Palestine!
15K notes
·
View notes
日本の運動系某大学大麻事件!日本の、NHK→事実上、法追究の意義、強調せず!法執行された∴法追究の意義を重ねて、反復取り上げるべきなのは、言うまでもない!幻覚症状は、2の次でええはずや。
少なくとも共謀性は、キャスター3人らしい。ならば、日本の、麻薬関係法令の違反幇助性(側面支援性、絶対にやるなと、言わなかった、そして、それを広めよった)が問われても、不思議はない。それこそ、覚えていますか?あなたこそ。人間やめますか?それとも、、、他メディアは、もっと、詳しく、法意識性含めて配信しとる。なぜ、緩いのかは、当局に、自ら白状説明することやろな。過失忖度も、絶対あかんやろ。もちろんな。いつもの、忖度と、状況、違いまっせ。一刻も早く。隠し立てせずな。★もちろん、内部調査で、重ねて疑いを否定した、人物がもしおるならや。緊急声明くらいは、ださないかんと、ちゃいますかな。責任者(あ)はんがや。否定されはった、根拠の明確化や。隠しだてなく、やろな。★★つまりや。かばいたて、しはったのかや。★★★仮にブツがあるのに、内部調査で、否定されはった場合。なぜやろな。責任者(あ)の、当然たる、説明責任や。それと、隠蔽教唆に一切関わっていない、立証責任や。それは、責任者(あ)側にある。自主的にやると、言わはれたからや。再犯性の、防止さえ、後ろ向きならば、すぐの幹部会にて、辞任されるのが、当然である。★★★ただし、(あ)の過失性主張は、通りようもない、と考えるのが、通例や。某大学には、医学部ありまっから。医師で、そのブツ見たら、大麻性、とわからん方が、不思議ちゃいますか。まさか内部調査から、その医学部は排除されたのか。ちゅう。★★★★それと、自転車乗ってた、男性(か)や。学生はんやろな。マスコミから、事件聞かれて、何も言えず、立ち去りはった。(か)は、知っていた場合→マスコミに告げる、知らなかった場合→知らないですが、もし、本当ならば、法令遵守すべきですと、言うしかない。分からない場合→大学を辞めるべし。もう一度、性根から、教育し直す必要がある。関わっていたのに、隠して逃げた→日本の、刑法、共同共謀正犯性やろな。つまり、その某大学は、麻薬関連さえコンプライアンスに後ろ向きで、かつ、大学の主役たる、学生さえも、適格な教育が施されていない。∵一を知れば十が分かる。まあ、某大学は、解体もしくは、解体的出直しが必須なわけやろな。もしくは、仮に真正たる内部調査で、ブツが見つからなかった場合。それでも、投げやりな、マスコミ���いはするべきでない。絶対に。なぜか?麻薬関連だから。厳粛に対峙せねば。学問の執行者ならば、なおさらである。
★★★★★しかるにそれを(あ)が自覚的、自意識的でないのが、おぞましき点やろな。たとえ、どんなに、有名な、作家はんでも、厳格な麻薬関連法規から、免責される、ことは、絶対にありまへん。むしろ、学生はんに、ちゃんとせい!ちゅうのが、本職やろな。するか、せいへんか。これから、注目されはるわけやがな。まあ、(あ)はんは、最低限→緊急声明やろな。後の幹部会→辞任も含めた対応。某大学→解体、もしくは、解体的出直し、やろな。★★★★★★もちろん、日本で別途に進んでいる、大麻関連と医療は、別ものやろ。それは、わからんと。ね。くらいは。
0 notes
US Should Clear-up Bombs It Left in Laos 🇱🇦 Before Questioning China's Influence There
— Ding Gang | July 26, 2023
Illustration: Liu Rui/Global Times
During Henry Kissinger's visit to Beijing last week, I was traveling in Laos. In conversations with Lao political and academic friends, I could always detect the presence of a shadow, that is, the influence of the US on Southeast Asia.
The US has a powerful presence in the region's economic, trade, political, and diplomacy spheres, even though the US and the region are separated by a vast ocean.
In Laos, looking around you feel like everything is from the past, like an old photo that has turned yellow but it's still clear. Older people will talk to you about the "secret wars" that the CIA orchestrated in Laos in the 1960s, and outside some houses, you will see American bomb casings erected. US warplanes dropped them on Laos decades ago, and sometimes they explode, injuring people nearby.
More than anything else, reality exists. When we talk about the Belt and Road Initiative, the cooperation in the Greater Mekong Region, there is always a mention of how the Americans see it, how the American media report it, and how they hype the so-called debt issue.
When a Hong Kong-funded company built a civilian airport in the Bokeo Province of Laos, US officials immediately came up to "visit" the region. It seems they were interested in more than just helping Laos remove the bombs.
A few days ago, the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, a Singaporean think tank, released a survey titled "Changing Perceptions in Laos Toward China," which said that more and more Laotian respondents are worried about China's economic influence. I wonder if the scholars who conducted the survey asked any Laotian farmers who benefited from eliminating bombs left by the US military by the Chinese companies or any Laotian employees who work for Chinese companies how much they earn per month.
In a recent report from the Chinese edition of the Voice of America, one scholar took the opportunity to call on Washington to commit to seizing the opportunity as a breaking point to check Beijing's expansion in Southeast Asia.
“US 🇺🇸 Dropped Bombs 💣 in Laos 🇱🇦, China 🇨🇳 Builds Railways 🚃”
"Check and balance" immediately makes me think of Henry Kissinger. It is the primary tool of the strategy of equilibrium that Kissinger "created" and utilized. The US has used such a tool to balance the challenges and maintain its hegemonic position.
Looking back over the past sixty years of China-US relations, it is easy to see that China is no longer a force that the US needs to utilize to counterbalance a main adversary.
Now, China is a friend of the US' enemy and even its foremost and long-term rival. That is why it is the first target of the US to check and balance.
This concept of checks and balances has profoundly affected the geopolitical understanding of China's neighboring countries, which have come to a juncture where they must draw a line in the sand.
When I took the high-speed train from Luang Prabang to Vientiane, I saw that all the compartments were almost full of passengers, most of them were Laotians. I observed them getting on and off the train with big bags, and I suddenly had a feeling that the US was tired. Suppose the China-Laos high-speed rail is seen as the rising China's economic energy spillover, reflecting the common pursuit of the development of China and Southeast Asian countries. In that case, who will the US checks and balances favor? And, can the US be checked and balanced?
China is not the Soviet Union in the Cold War era. China's rise is all-encompassing and multi-layered, a wide-ranging engagement and intermingling with its neighbors and the world, including the US, in almost all fields of industry, education, finance, culture, etc., and likewise a process in which 1.4 billion people are running towards affluence through peaceful development.
After I visit Bokeo Airport, I would like to say one thing: Americans are welcome to Southeast Asia to participate in the development. The infrastructure China is helping to build there will surely be a boon to American investment.
However, the best way for Americans to gain the trust of the Laotians is to first clean up the bombs they left behind.
It's time for the Americans and those who follow them to jump out of the loop of the equilibrium theory that has gone out of fashion.
— The Author is a Senior Editor with People's Daily, and currently a senior fellow with the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China.
0 notes