Tumgik
#orientation video
god-u · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
35 notes · View notes
ao3commentoftheday · 16 days
Text
A video that shows the Ao3 homepage with the user not logged in. The narrator says, "This is what Ao3 looks like when you don't have an account."
The background changes so that Ao3 is in dark mode (Reversi) and the narrator says, "This is what it can look like when you do have an account."
Upbeat music begins to play and the video shows the homepage of Ao3 with various different skins applied. Each skin is listed below.
Peachy Keen site skin
Glowy Dark Mode site skin
Rainbow site skins (light and dark)
Pink and Green Frog-Themed site skin
Game Changer site skin
Minimalist (purple) site skin
Art Deco Light Mode site skin
unpublished site skin that is inspired by Simply Twilling
Dark Mode Galaxy-Themed site skin
If you don't yet have an account and you want one, go to the Ao3 homepage (by tapping on the site name at the top of the page) and tap on the Get Invited! button.
You need to provide an email address in order to get an account. This should be your own address and one that you can access. Your email is the only way that Ao3 will ever contact you. I recommend not using a school or work email address to sign up for Ao3.
Invitations are sent in batches, and they're currently sending out 6000 per day. They limit how many they send in an effort to reduce spam on the site. You can see where you are on the waitlist by entering your email address on this page. Right now, the wait time is about 11 days.
You can still read fic on the site without an account, but you need to have an account to change the site's appearance, to post a fic of your own, to save bookmarks of fics and various other things. You can leave kudos and comments without an account, but your kudos will be listed as guest. Once you get an account, it will list your username instead.
889 notes · View notes
privateolives · 4 months
Text
This is probably because I grew up watching 24/7 animal planet, but what finally made the allo/aplatonic thing click for me were the nature's of big cats.
Lions are powerful, regal creatures who are uniquely adapted to pack life. They need these connections to live a healthy life; A lonely lion is a miserable creature indeed.
Jaguars are solitary, beautiful creatures who live happily solitary. They prowl their lush world with self-sufficient majesty. A jaguar is not lonely without a pack. In fact, forcing jaguars to share space with others they do not enjoy is just as damaging as forcing a lion to live alone.
A lion may choose to head out on it's own for the most part, but in the end must return to the pack to thrive. A jaguar can choose to trust and enjoy the company of others, but they never feel the need to form a pack.
Is a jaguar selfish for this? A psychopath, a narcissist or any other such horrid assumptions? Is it a less moral creature than a lion, who seeks others like it to thrive?
Is a lion pathetic, or needy, or selfish for wanting community? For requiring contact with others like they require water? For their inherent need to string complicated webs of relationships that may seem silly or dramatic to others?
Of course not. These are ridiculous questions to even ask.
They are simply lions and jaguars.
In fact, is a jaguar that chooses to spend time with you not as magical as a lion's love? For a creature that needs no bond to thrive to still enjoy your presence enough to share it a time? Is a lion who can prowl the night alone not impressive in its strength and resilience? Is it not awe-inspiring in its ability to conquer a life it was never wired for and reign still?
Are they not both beautiful and awe-inspiring in their own ways, without being wrong?
Alloplatonics. Aplatonics. Are we not both special and beautiful in both our bonds and self-confident happiness equal, in each our ways? Is there not unique beauty in lifelong bonded packs and magical encounters that need no perpetuity to carry life forward?
Are we not but lions and jaguars? Neither wrong, neither selfish, but just different and beautiful creatures in each our ways?
That's how I've come to see it, anyway.
560 notes · View notes
imetacrab · 6 months
Text
At the end of every Hercule Poirot story, he always calls an emergency meeting to find the imposter among us.
211 notes · View notes
aydaaaguefort · 1 year
Text
This was so wild I had to clip it in it’s entirety
968 notes · View notes
pinkfey · 8 months
Text
wish karlach artists would stop drawing her with slim white woman features
324 notes · View notes
daftpatience · 3 months
Text
man rodeoh hasnt added my not so good review and now im starting to wonder if theres some suspicious reason they dont have any reviews under 4 stars
94 notes · View notes
audreydoeskaren · 1 year
Text
Note about periodization
I am going to start describing time periods in Chinese history with European historical terms like medieval, Renaissance, early modern, Georgian and Victorian and so on, alongside the standard dynastic terms like Song, Ming and Qing I usually use. So like something about the Ming Dynasty I will tag Ming Dynasty and Renaissance. I already do it sometimes but not consistently. Here’s why.
A common criticism levied against this practice is that periodization is geographically specific and that it’s wrong and eurocentric to refer to, say, late Ming China as Renaissance China. It is a valid criticism, but in my experience the result of not using European periodization is that people default to ‘ancient’ when describing any period in Chinese history before the 20th century, which does conjure up specific images of European antiquity that do not align temporally with the Chinese period in question. I have talked about my issue with ‘ancient China’ before but I want to elaborate. People already consciously or subconsciously consider European periodizations of history to be universal, because of the legacy of colonialism and how eurocentric modern human culture generally is. By not using European historical terms for non-European places, people will simply think those places exist outside of history altogether, or at least exist within an early, primitive stage of European history. It’s a recipe for the denial of coevalness. I think there is a certain dangerous naivete among scholars who believe that if they refrain from using European periodization for non-European places, people will switch to the periodization appropriate for those places in question and challenge eurocentric history writing; in practice I’ve never seen it happen. The general public is not literate enough about history to do these conversions in situ. I have accumulated a fairly large pool of examples just from the number of people spamming ‘ancient China’ in my askbox despite repeatedly specifying the time periods I’m interested in (not antiquity!). If I say ‘Ming China’ instead of ‘Renaissance China’ people will take it as something on the same temporal plane as classical Greece instead of Tudor England. How many people would be surprised if I say that Emperor Qianlong of the Qing was a contemporary of George Washington and Frederick the Great? I’ve seen people talk about him as if he was some tribal leader in the time of Tacitus. European periodization is something I want to embrace ‘under erasure’ so to say, using something strategically for certain advantages while acknowledging its problems. Now there is a history of how the idea of ‘ancient China’ became so entrenched in popular media and I think it goes a bit deeper than just Orientalism, but that’s topic for another post. Right now I’m only concerned with my decision to add European periodization terms.
In order to compensate for the use of eurocentric periodization, I have carried out some experiments in the reverse direction in my daily life, by using Chinese reign years to describe European history. The responses are entertaining. I live in a Georgian tenement in the UK but I like to confuse friends and family by calling it a ‘Jiaqing era flat’. A friend of mine (Chinese) lives in an 1880s flat and she burst out in laughter when I called it ‘Guangxu era’, claiming that it sounded like something from court. But why is it funny? The temporal description is correct, the 1880s were indeed in the Guangxu era. And ‘Guangxu’ shouldn’t invoke royal imagery anymore than ‘Victorian’ (though said friend does indulge in more Qing court dramas than is probably healthy). It is because Chinese (and I’m sure many other non-white peoples) have been trained to believe that our histories are particular and distant, confined to a geographical location, and that they somehow cannot be mapped onto European history, which unfolded parallel to the history of the rest of the world, until we had been colonized. We have been taught that European history is history, but our history is ethnography.
It should also be noted that periodization for European history is not something essentialist and intrinsic either, period terms are created by historians and arbitrarily imposed onto the past to begin with. I was reading a book about medievalism studies and it talked about how the entire concept of the Middle Ages was manufactured in the Renaissance to create a temporal other for Europeans at the time to project undesired traits onto, to distance themselves from a supposedly ‘dark’ past. People living in the European Middle Ages likely did not think of themselves as living in a ‘middle’ age between something and something, so there is absolutely no natural basis for calling the period roughly between the 6th and 16th centuries ‘medieval’. Despite questionable origins, periodization of European history has become more or less standard in history writing throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, whereas around the same time colonial anthropological narratives framed non-European and non-white societies, including China, as existing outside of history altogether. Periodization of European history was geographically specific partially because it was conceived with Europe in mind and Europe only, since any other place may as well be in some primordial time.
Perhaps in the future there will develop global periodizations that consider how interconnected human history is. There probably are already attempts but they’re just not prominent enough to reach me yet. Until that point, I feel absolutely no moral baggage in describing, say, the Song Dynasty as ‘medieval’ because people in 12th century Europe did not think of themselves as ‘medieval’ either. I am the historian, I do whatever I want, basically.
927 notes · View notes
demoncia2 · 8 months
Text
I couldn't stop thinking about him being a dork I HAD to go through the shorts and find my favorite clips of his goofy ass
156 notes · View notes
miyrumiyru · 6 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
A bit tattered and disheveled, But their pride never will wither!
Oriental magpie (Pica serica)
45 notes · View notes
Text
Okay but hear me out: An Undead Nightmare DLC in which you play as Dutch, set between the events of RDR and RDR2, having to fight off the deceased members of the gang.
His former family, the one he betrayed, pursues him relentlessly in revenge for dooming the gang. Is any of it real? Or the guilt and paranoia ate him away and he finally lost his mind? That's up to your interpretation.
75 notes · View notes
genericaces · 2 months
Text
youtube
hey i made a little edit about angel, spike and the fanged four, and the violent cycle of vampire siring. featuring homoerotic beatdowns and the search for original sin, if that's your thing
42 notes · View notes
onenicebugperday · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
@alhexy submitted: a tiny guy and some beetle guy
Tumblr media Tumblr media
im pretty sure the hover fly / bee mimic is from the genus toxomerus and ive also seen a decent variety of bumblebees, im not sure of the species of the bee in the picture and was wondering if you thought it could be a Rusty Patch bumblebee? im not good with bumblebee ID (in Maine) (if you cant ID, dont worry)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
i think this is a robberfly? and a really cool spider
Tumblr media
a nice water strider :)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
i believe the small blue/black/gray guys on the water surface are marine spring tails
Great bunch of pals! If they were found on the coast in Maine then the springtails could be marine springtails, but if they were on freshwater then they were likely just water springtails. The bumblebee looks like a tricolored bumblebee, Bombus ternarius. And yes the dude after that is a robber fly!
73 notes · View notes
ravenalla · 6 months
Text
I still love Villainous but to be honest besides the designs I just don’t find a lot of the side characters introduced anywhere near as interesting as the main ones. Also interweaving the show’s plot with all the extra content (ex. Heed’s escape, P.E.A.C.E, the recent fictional news show) I feel like is gonna get pretty confusing if they keep adding more and more, the lore has kinda been overtaking the character focus in some ways. I’m super grateful they’re trying to keep us entertained during the wait for new content, but I also get why at least for the English speaking fandom a lot of people have moved on from it since the 2017-2019 era.
42 notes · View notes
shinewonder · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media
“my cute son! (❁´◡`❁)”
132 notes · View notes
amphiptere · 9 months
Text
I am very annoyed with everyone now reviving the “good omens (book/s1) was queerbaiting” debate. what part of “angels are generally sexless” and “crowley and aziraphale are canonically non-binary” and “‘I am THE southern pansy’” did y’all miss
44 notes · View notes