Tumgik
#legal ethics
ivygorgon · 9 days
Text
AN OPEN LETTER to THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Co-sponsor The Judicial Ethics Enforcement Act of 2024!
59 so far! Help us get to 100 signers!
A group of House Democrats, led by Reps. Melanie Stansbury, Ilhan Omar and Jamie Raskin, have introduced legislation that would strengthen oversight of the Supreme Court. I’m writing in support of it.
The Judicial Ethics Enforcement Act of 2024 would authorize the creation of an office of the inspector general to investigate allegations of misconduct in the judicial branch. The inspector general would also investigate alleged violations of the Supreme Court code of ethics, issued in November; conduct and supervise audits; and recommend changes in laws or regulations governing the judiciary. The inspector general would be required to inform the attorney general when they believe there has been a violation of federal criminal law.
Congress must pass this bill. Confidence in the Supreme Court is at an all-time low, and there’s good reason for that. Several of its justices are deeply compromised and everyone can see it.
Please co-sponsor The Judicial Ethics Enforcement Act of 2024 right away, so the provisions in it can begin to restore Americans’ faith in our highest court. Thanks.
▶ Created on April 19 by Jess Craven
📱 Text SIGN PWCSGV to 50409
🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409
2 notes · View notes
gwydionmisha · 5 months
Text
youtube
Trump's Worst Lawyer, Alina Habba, May Be Disbarred For This
CW: Sexual Harassment
2 notes · View notes
schraubd · 8 months
Text
.... And Getting Worse Roundup
This will not be my cheeriest roundup. But there are a bunch of links burning a hole in my pocket, so here you go. * * * * Apropos yesterday's post on Fugitive Uterus Laws, a Washington Post article on similar efforts underway to set up checkpoint towns in Texas designed to capture any pregnant women who has designs on leaving the state for freedom. North Carolina Republicans considering impeaching a state supreme court justice because she talked about racism. While I can't fault Slate for juxtaposing this against the undisclosed largesse heaped upon Justice Thomas, my mind more rapidly went to efforts in Wisconsin to impeach a state supreme court justice because she might vote for democracy. A politically engaged fifteen year old kid asked a (not even that tough!) question that made Ron DeSantis uncomfortable on the campaign trail. So he sent his goons to rough him up. You see, the real problem with the "War on Drugs" is that it's too metaphorical. The latest Fifth Circuit crack-pottery: it's probably illegal for the FDA to tell humans they're not horses (yes, this is the latest conservative institution to burn its remaining dignity in defense of ivermectin conspiracies). Georgia school district: saying the word "gay" around fifth graders is like graphically describing the horrors of the Holocaust to kindergarteners.  via The Debate Link https://ift.tt/75TN1sn
4 notes · View notes
sixbucks · 10 months
Text
Arkansas Supreme Court: Ethical attorney conduct is just not in the budget.
2 notes · View notes
attorney-anon · 3 months
Text
I think a judge in a case I'm doing on the side for a family member may be committing judicial misconduct. Will I report it? Probably not, because the last thing I need is to start a war with a random judge, and I can't prove that it's misconduct - and even if I keep my identity confidential, this type of case is so rare that he will absolutely know it came from me.
But it's going to bother me.
1 note · View note
koherston · 9 months
Text
Disqualification of Attorney Reversed in Longstanding Child-Custody Dispute in Kingston, Tennessee: Nelson v. Justice
When can a lawyer be disqualified from representing a party in Tennessee?
Facts: Mother and Father are the parents of Child. In 2020, Mother moved to disqualify Father’s attorney, Ms. Guerrero, who is also Father’s wife and the mother of one of Father’s children. Mother argued that in her efforts to collect a monetary judgment against Father, Father’s wife may, as his spouse, know about Father’s assets and what Mother perceives to be Father’s efforts to hinder the…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
uniquexblogs · 11 months
Text
0 notes
Text
If a powerful secret around-20%-of-humanity-group are forcing their own man-made hell upon others whereby their “man-made hell”/methods/ways force(s) choice individuals to suffer & break(s) laws in every legal law system, is/are such/they malevolent?
Tumblr media
0 notes
crehador · 6 months
Text
in reverse 1999 you have this magic suitcase that's got like a mini-realm inside, basically your base of operations is in there
so at one point early in the story you're in the suitcase but the suitcase is just like sitting out in the open in the 'real' world, so some kids start messing with it
and your very first 'battle' stage is to chase them off but the stage description is like
Tumblr media
hilarious
877 notes · View notes
incorrectbatfam · 1 year
Note
Now batfam as LEGAL life hacks
Dick: Regardless of your gender or sexuality, set your dating profile preferences to everyone. The more likes you get, the higher up the algorithm you'll be boosted
Jason: You can hit anyone as hard as you want if you glue a dead wasp to your hand
Tim: Don't like doing dishes? Grab some clean ones, run them under water, put them on the drying rack, and tell your family to do "the rest"
Damian: Start a raccoon removal business by releasing raccoons around someone's property before offering your services
Duke: If you want to see a movie in theaters without financially supporting it, get a ticket to a different movie showing at the same time
Cullen: Buy the cheapest ticket to a concert and once you're in, check Ticketmaster to see which seats haven't sold and move to the best one
Stephanie: No one will notice if you stop by a hotel in the morning for their free continental breakfast
Cassandra: Before snooping through someone's belongings, take a picture so you can put everything back the way it was
Barbara: Have a common name? There are probably people on LinkedIn who have a better CV than you. Their references are now yours
Harper: Selling a car? Take pictures of it in a nice neighborhood to make it seem classy and well-maintained
Carrie: If you miss an online sale by a few hours, use a VPN to switch to a timezone where it's still going on
Kate: End an unwanted phone call by turning on airplane mode—the other person will see it as the call dropped rather than you hanging up
Alfred: If someone's unexpectedly at the door and you're not sure if you need a weapon, a freshly boiled kettle is both the most threatening and inviting thing you can have in your hand
Selina: If you see someone shoplifting: no the fuck you didn't
Bruce: The number of living grandparents you have resets to 4 every time you get a new job
1K notes · View notes
gwydionmisha · 1 year
Video
youtube
Trump's Lawyers Fined $1,000,000+
1 note · View note
schraubd · 1 year
Text
Corruption in the Family
By now, you've no doubt heard about the ongoing corruption controversy regarding Justice Thomas failing to disclose numerous financial gifts from a billionaire conservative friend. To a large extent, the usual suspects are lining up to criticize Justice Thomas and the usual suspects are organizing to defend him. But I want to focus on one thing in particular, embodied by this tweet from former Thomas clerk and Notre Dame Law Professor Nicole Garnett.
I've known Justice Thomas for over 25 years. He is the rare person whose goodness matches his greatness. It breaks my heart that so many are willing to go so far to attack a good, and great, man for political gain.
— Nicole Garnett (@nsgarnett) April 13, 2023
I am sympathetic to Professor Garnett here. I truly am. I've often pondered how I would respond if a loved one -- a mentor, relative, parent, friend -- was credibly accused of corruption or some other dire crime. How would I handle it if the judge I clerked for, the late Diane E. Murphy, whom I absolutely adored, turned out to have accepted millions of dollars in "gifts" without proper disclosures?
Even in writing that sentence, I wanted to hasten to add "now, I could never imagine Judge Murphy doing such a thing." Which is true, I can't imagine it. Judge Murphy was an extraordinarily kind, generous, and humble person; universally respected by peers of all ideological persuasions. She was the furthest thing from a financial grandstander.
But that's just the thing: in most cases like this, the crime is unimaginable to the perpetrator's loved ones right up until it happens. It is a myth, I think, that most wrongs of this nature are only committed by persons whom, once the truth comes out, their closest relations will be like "you know what? He did seem the type." It's always going to be a shock to someone.
Be honest with yourself: when it comes to the people closest to you, would you actually know if they were doing something wrong akin to what Justice Thomas is accused of? "Know" not in the loose sense of "I know their character," but in the strong sense of "I'm familiar with their accounting practices"/"I've seen their disclosures"/"I know what's going in and out of their bank accounts"? We don't know. It would come as a shock. If you woke up tomorrow and your parent was arrested for skimming money from their job, you'd be blindsided, and not really because you have a blind spot as far as your parents are concerned. The truth is, you would have probably had no way of knowing what they were up to until the investigation actually broke. It really would be unfathomable, even were it true.
So I do sympathize with Professor Garnett. I don't think she's myopic in identifying Justice Thomas as a personally warm and generous human being (something I've heard from multiple sources). I don't think it is a function of self-delusion that she didn't see this coming.
But the fact is that, for essentially every scandal like this, the perpetrator has loved ones for whom the scandal comes as a terrible, unfathomable surprise. That doesn't mean it didn't happen. That doesn't mean it wasn't wrong. For the individuals affected, the dissonance between the person they know and the crime alleged is beyond abnormal, it is a terrible, almost irresolvable discordance. From the vantage of broader society, that discordance is utterly and mundanely normal -- it characterizes every single case.
And so ultimately, this response to Professor Garnett gets it exactly right:
Justice Thomas might possibly be — and we’ve heard this from multiple sources — the kindest, most generous justice on the Supreme Court. That doesn’t change the fact he’s involved in a massive ethics scandal of his own making. https://t.co/eO6YYXWe7c
— Fix the Court (@FixTheCourt) April 14, 2023
via The Debate Link https://ift.tt/U9TLzdX
2 notes · View notes
Text
We need more Sirius just doing the most fucked up shit thinking its completely normal and James being like... haha... um no we DON'T throw stones at cats around here... actually, its considered RUDE to punch someone in the face... yes even if they pushed you a little in the corridor
1K notes · View notes
prince-liest · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
I was outlining the next radiostatic fic when I got distracted by the fact that someone needs to put Lucifer into their lap and tell him he's a good boy, and now I'm 6.2k words deep into something that's turned out way more emotional than I thought it would.
113 notes · View notes
rileyclaw · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
happy @marichatmay to me and also everyone else . day 1: balcony!! it loops!!
4K notes · View notes
vimbry · 1 year
Text
john flansburgh barely keeping up a moral celebrity public front is so funny. someone's like "aw I wish I could go to a show but they're 21+ :(" and he goes "fake ID", someone asks if their music is available for download and he's like "they might be giants torrent...." you can't say these things. it's hilarious
438 notes · View notes